The association between perceived and observed ability to use everyday technology in working age people with ABI

Everyday technology (ET), including computers and automated telephone services, is increasingly required for everyday functioning. However, people with acquired brain injury (ABI) may have difficulty with ET use. To design interventions to support ET use, further knowledge of how to assess dimension...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Main Authors: Malinowsky, Camilla, Larsson Lund, Maria
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Inst för neurobiologi, vårdvetenskap och samhälle / Dept of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10616/44999
id ftkarolinskainst:oai:openarchive.ki.se:10616/44999
record_format openpolar
spelling ftkarolinskainst:oai:openarchive.ki.se:10616/44999 2024-01-07T09:44:45+01:00 The association between perceived and observed ability to use everyday technology in working age people with ABI Malinowsky, Camilla Larsson Lund, Maria 2016-01-18 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10616/44999 eng eng Inst för neurobiologi, vårdvetenskap och samhälle / Dept of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3109/11038128.2014.919020 1103-8128 http://hdl.handle.net/10616/44999 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/article art acceptedVersion 2016 ftkarolinskainst https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2014.919020 2023-12-13T23:37:07Z Everyday technology (ET), including computers and automated telephone services, is increasingly required for everyday functioning. However, people with acquired brain injury (ABI) may have difficulty with ET use. To design interventions to support ET use, further knowledge of how to assess dimensions of such use is needed. This study investigated the relationship between the perceived difficulty of ET use (self-reported using the Short version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire, S-ETUQ) and observed ability to use ET (observed using the Management of Everyday Technology Assessment, META) in a sample of people with ABI (n=81). Data were analysed using a Rasch measurement model, and person measures of perceived difficulty and observed ability to use ET were identified and correlated. The person measures had a correlation of .49 (p ˂.001). In groups of different severity levels after ABI, significant associations were found in the moderate (.36) and severe (.47) disability groups. In the good recovery group, only a non-significant correlation was found (.21). This indicates that the S-ETUQ and the META measures different but complementary dimensions of ET use. Hence, the assessments are proposed to be used together in clinical practice to more fully understand the ability of people with ABI to use ET. Promobilia Foundation Strategic Research Health Care Programme of Umeå University Luleå University of Technology Accepted Article in Journal/Newspaper Luleå Luleå Luleå Karolinska Institutet: Publications Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 21 6 465 472
institution Open Polar
collection Karolinska Institutet: Publications
op_collection_id ftkarolinskainst
language English
description Everyday technology (ET), including computers and automated telephone services, is increasingly required for everyday functioning. However, people with acquired brain injury (ABI) may have difficulty with ET use. To design interventions to support ET use, further knowledge of how to assess dimensions of such use is needed. This study investigated the relationship between the perceived difficulty of ET use (self-reported using the Short version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire, S-ETUQ) and observed ability to use ET (observed using the Management of Everyday Technology Assessment, META) in a sample of people with ABI (n=81). Data were analysed using a Rasch measurement model, and person measures of perceived difficulty and observed ability to use ET were identified and correlated. The person measures had a correlation of .49 (p ˂.001). In groups of different severity levels after ABI, significant associations were found in the moderate (.36) and severe (.47) disability groups. In the good recovery group, only a non-significant correlation was found (.21). This indicates that the S-ETUQ and the META measures different but complementary dimensions of ET use. Hence, the assessments are proposed to be used together in clinical practice to more fully understand the ability of people with ABI to use ET. Promobilia Foundation Strategic Research Health Care Programme of Umeå University Luleå University of Technology Accepted
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Malinowsky, Camilla
Larsson Lund, Maria
spellingShingle Malinowsky, Camilla
Larsson Lund, Maria
The association between perceived and observed ability to use everyday technology in working age people with ABI
author_facet Malinowsky, Camilla
Larsson Lund, Maria
author_sort Malinowsky, Camilla
title The association between perceived and observed ability to use everyday technology in working age people with ABI
title_short The association between perceived and observed ability to use everyday technology in working age people with ABI
title_full The association between perceived and observed ability to use everyday technology in working age people with ABI
title_fullStr The association between perceived and observed ability to use everyday technology in working age people with ABI
title_full_unstemmed The association between perceived and observed ability to use everyday technology in working age people with ABI
title_sort association between perceived and observed ability to use everyday technology in working age people with abi
publisher Inst för neurobiologi, vårdvetenskap och samhälle / Dept of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10616/44999
genre Luleå
Luleå
Luleå
genre_facet Luleå
Luleå
Luleå
op_relation Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3109/11038128.2014.919020
1103-8128
http://hdl.handle.net/10616/44999
op_rights CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2014.919020
container_title Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
container_volume 21
container_issue 6
container_start_page 465
op_container_end_page 472
_version_ 1787426175354667008