The Russian Empire as a Multicultural Society: Between Assimilation and Ethno-Religious Segmentation

The article analyzes the policy of the Russian Empire government in relation to various ethno-religious communities in the XVIII – early XX centuries. In that time the official ideology represented the Russian Empire as a monoethnic state, in which there were national minorities, which were numerica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: BUREHA, Volodymyr
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Ukrainian
Published: Eastern European Institute of Theology (EEIT) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/217140
https://doi.org/10.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2.5
id ftjtreejt:oai:ojs.journals.uran.ua:article/217140
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjtreejt:oai:ojs.journals.uran.ua:article/217140 2024-01-14T10:06:10+01:00 The Russian Empire as a Multicultural Society: Between Assimilation and Ethno-Religious Segmentation Російська імперія як мультикультурний соціум: між асиміляцією та етно-релігійною сегментацією BUREHA, Volodymyr 2020-11-18 application/pdf http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/217140 https://doi.org/10.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2.5 ukr ukr Eastern European Institute of Theology (EEIT) http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/217140/217375 http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/217140 doi:10.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2.5 Copyright (c) 2020 Володимир БУРЕГА https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2020): THEOLOGICAL REFLECTIONS: Eastern European Journal of Theology; 90-105 Богословские размышления: Восточноевропейский журнал богословия; Том 18 № 2 (2020): БОГОСЛОВСКИЕ РАЗМЫШЛЕНИЯ: Восточноевропейский журнал богословия; 90-105 Богословські роздуми: Східноєвропейський журнал богослов’я; Том 18 № 2 (2020): БОГОСЛОВСЬКI РОЗДУМИ: Східноєвропейський журнал богослов'я; 90-105 2789-1577 2789-1569 10.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2 мультикультуралізм мультикультурне суспільство Російська імперія інородці Multiculturalism Multicultural Society Russian Empire Inorodtsy info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Рецензированная статья Peer-reviewed Article Рецензована стаття 2020 ftjtreejt https://doi.org/10.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2.510.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2 2023-12-20T08:26:04Z The article analyzes the policy of the Russian Empire government in relation to various ethno-religious communities in the XVIII – early XX centuries. In that time the official ideology represented the Russian Empire as a monoethnic state, in which there were national minorities, which were numerically significantly inferior to the titular nation. The officially titular nation in the Russian Empire was the “Russian people”, which included not only Russians, but also Ukrainians and Belarusians. The prospect of recognizing Ukrainians and Belarusians as separate nations was seen by the government as a threat to the internal strength of the state. Therefore, the development of Ukrainian national culture in the Russian Empire has always been considered in a political context. Hence the severe restrictions on the Ukrainian national movement.Based on the classification of Göran Therborn, the author shows that the Russian Empire was a pre-modern multicultural society. However, the government’s approach to different «inocultural» communities was extremely heterogeneous. The author considers the national and cultural policy of the Russian government in relation to the Grand Duchy of Finland, the Kingdom of Poland, the Baltic provinces, Central Asia, the Caucasus. Particular attention is paid to the status of so-called «Inorodtsy». This category in the Russian Empire included, first of all, the indigenous tribes of Siberia, Chukchi, Kalmyks, Kyrgyz, nomads of Central Asia and the North Caucasus, as well as Jews. The author shows that the strategic goal of the government has always been to form a Russian political nation, ie a multinational and multicultural community that would be loyal to the ruling dynasty and realize itself as a single political entity. Achieving this goal involved providing varying degrees of national-cultural or even political autonomy to different groups of citizens. В статті аналізується політика уряду Російської імперії по відношенню до різних етно-релігійних спільнот у ХVIII – на початку ХХ ст. ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Chukchi Siberia Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology
institution Open Polar
collection Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology
op_collection_id ftjtreejt
language Ukrainian
topic мультикультуралізм
мультикультурне суспільство
Російська імперія
інородці
Multiculturalism
Multicultural Society
Russian Empire
Inorodtsy
spellingShingle мультикультуралізм
мультикультурне суспільство
Російська імперія
інородці
Multiculturalism
Multicultural Society
Russian Empire
Inorodtsy
BUREHA, Volodymyr
The Russian Empire as a Multicultural Society: Between Assimilation and Ethno-Religious Segmentation
topic_facet мультикультуралізм
мультикультурне суспільство
Російська імперія
інородці
Multiculturalism
Multicultural Society
Russian Empire
Inorodtsy
description The article analyzes the policy of the Russian Empire government in relation to various ethno-religious communities in the XVIII – early XX centuries. In that time the official ideology represented the Russian Empire as a monoethnic state, in which there were national minorities, which were numerically significantly inferior to the titular nation. The officially titular nation in the Russian Empire was the “Russian people”, which included not only Russians, but also Ukrainians and Belarusians. The prospect of recognizing Ukrainians and Belarusians as separate nations was seen by the government as a threat to the internal strength of the state. Therefore, the development of Ukrainian national culture in the Russian Empire has always been considered in a political context. Hence the severe restrictions on the Ukrainian national movement.Based on the classification of Göran Therborn, the author shows that the Russian Empire was a pre-modern multicultural society. However, the government’s approach to different «inocultural» communities was extremely heterogeneous. The author considers the national and cultural policy of the Russian government in relation to the Grand Duchy of Finland, the Kingdom of Poland, the Baltic provinces, Central Asia, the Caucasus. Particular attention is paid to the status of so-called «Inorodtsy». This category in the Russian Empire included, first of all, the indigenous tribes of Siberia, Chukchi, Kalmyks, Kyrgyz, nomads of Central Asia and the North Caucasus, as well as Jews. The author shows that the strategic goal of the government has always been to form a Russian political nation, ie a multinational and multicultural community that would be loyal to the ruling dynasty and realize itself as a single political entity. Achieving this goal involved providing varying degrees of national-cultural or even political autonomy to different groups of citizens. В статті аналізується політика уряду Російської імперії по відношенню до різних етно-релігійних спільнот у ХVIII – на початку ХХ ст. ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author BUREHA, Volodymyr
author_facet BUREHA, Volodymyr
author_sort BUREHA, Volodymyr
title The Russian Empire as a Multicultural Society: Between Assimilation and Ethno-Religious Segmentation
title_short The Russian Empire as a Multicultural Society: Between Assimilation and Ethno-Religious Segmentation
title_full The Russian Empire as a Multicultural Society: Between Assimilation and Ethno-Religious Segmentation
title_fullStr The Russian Empire as a Multicultural Society: Between Assimilation and Ethno-Religious Segmentation
title_full_unstemmed The Russian Empire as a Multicultural Society: Between Assimilation and Ethno-Religious Segmentation
title_sort russian empire as a multicultural society: between assimilation and ethno-religious segmentation
publisher Eastern European Institute of Theology (EEIT)
publishDate 2020
url http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/217140
https://doi.org/10.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2.5
genre Chukchi
Siberia
genre_facet Chukchi
Siberia
op_source Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2020): THEOLOGICAL REFLECTIONS: Eastern European Journal of Theology; 90-105
Богословские размышления: Восточноевропейский журнал богословия; Том 18 № 2 (2020): БОГОСЛОВСКИЕ РАЗМЫШЛЕНИЯ: Восточноевропейский журнал богословия; 90-105
Богословські роздуми: Східноєвропейський журнал богослов’я; Том 18 № 2 (2020): БОГОСЛОВСЬКI РОЗДУМИ: Східноєвропейський журнал богослов'я; 90-105
2789-1577
2789-1569
10.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2
op_relation http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/217140/217375
http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/217140
doi:10.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2.5
op_rights Copyright (c) 2020 Володимир БУРЕГА
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2.510.29357/2521-179X.2020.v18.2
_version_ 1788060476009086976