Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic

Russia’s full-blown invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has led to concern about the implications for Arctic governance and stability. The Arctic Council has been temporarily suspended and the security tension between Russia and the seven other Western Arctic states has intensified. A more isolated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies
Main Authors: Staun, Jørgen, Sørensen, Camilla T. N.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian Military Studies 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://account.sjms.nu/index.php/sms-j-sjms/article/view/178
https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.178
id ftjsjms:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/178
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjsjms:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/178 2023-06-11T04:07:59+02:00 Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic Staun, Jørgen Sørensen, Camilla T. N. 2023-05-08 application/pdf text/xml https://account.sjms.nu/index.php/sms-j-sjms/article/view/178 https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.178 eng eng Scandinavian Military Studies https://account.sjms.nu/index.php/sms-j-sjms/article/view/178/204 https://account.sjms.nu/index.php/sms-j-sjms/article/view/178/205 https://account.sjms.nu/index.php/sms-j-sjms/article/view/178 doi:10.31374/sjms.178 Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023); 24–39 Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Vol 6 Nr 1 (2023); 24–39 Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; v. 6 n. 1 (2023); 24–39 Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Vol. 6 No 1 (2023); 24–39 Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; ##issue.vol## 6 ##issue.no## 1 (2023); 24–39 Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Bd. 6 Nr. 1 (2023); 24–39 Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2023); 24–39 2596-3856 strategic culture Ends-Ways-Means discourse analysis Arctic Russia China info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2023 ftjsjms https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.178 2023-05-10T22:51:13Z Russia’s full-blown invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has led to concern about the implications for Arctic governance and stability. The Arctic Council has been temporarily suspended and the security tension between Russia and the seven other Western Arctic states has intensified. A more isolated Russia under Western sanctions leans even more towards the East, where China, especially, figures as an attractive strategic partner. In this article, we set out to examine the prospects for Russian-Chinese strategic cooperation in the Arctic. We introduce a social constructivist perspective highlighting how strategic culture may serve as a lens through which to analyse developments in states’ strategies – specifically their ends, ways and means. Applying our culturally applicable ends-ways-means (EWM) model, we show how Russian and Chinese strategic cultures set distinct limits to their strategic cooperation in the Arctic. The two states’ identity-driven urge to secure and display their great power position will increasingly collide. It is therefore our prediction that Russia and China will eventually act in ways that will gradually come to undermine their strategic cooperation in the region. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Council Arctic Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies Arctic Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies 6 1 24 39
institution Open Polar
collection Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies
op_collection_id ftjsjms
language English
topic strategic culture
Ends-Ways-Means
discourse analysis
Arctic
Russia
China
spellingShingle strategic culture
Ends-Ways-Means
discourse analysis
Arctic
Russia
China
Staun, Jørgen
Sørensen, Camilla T. N.
Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic
topic_facet strategic culture
Ends-Ways-Means
discourse analysis
Arctic
Russia
China
description Russia’s full-blown invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has led to concern about the implications for Arctic governance and stability. The Arctic Council has been temporarily suspended and the security tension between Russia and the seven other Western Arctic states has intensified. A more isolated Russia under Western sanctions leans even more towards the East, where China, especially, figures as an attractive strategic partner. In this article, we set out to examine the prospects for Russian-Chinese strategic cooperation in the Arctic. We introduce a social constructivist perspective highlighting how strategic culture may serve as a lens through which to analyse developments in states’ strategies – specifically their ends, ways and means. Applying our culturally applicable ends-ways-means (EWM) model, we show how Russian and Chinese strategic cultures set distinct limits to their strategic cooperation in the Arctic. The two states’ identity-driven urge to secure and display their great power position will increasingly collide. It is therefore our prediction that Russia and China will eventually act in ways that will gradually come to undermine their strategic cooperation in the region.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Staun, Jørgen
Sørensen, Camilla T. N.
author_facet Staun, Jørgen
Sørensen, Camilla T. N.
author_sort Staun, Jørgen
title Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic
title_short Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic
title_full Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic
title_fullStr Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic
title_sort incompatible strategic cultures limit russian-chinese strategic cooperation in the arctic
publisher Scandinavian Military Studies
publishDate 2023
url https://account.sjms.nu/index.php/sms-j-sjms/article/view/178
https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.178
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic Council
Arctic
genre_facet Arctic Council
Arctic
op_source Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023); 24–39
Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Vol 6 Nr 1 (2023); 24–39
Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; v. 6 n. 1 (2023); 24–39
Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Vol. 6 No 1 (2023); 24–39
Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; ##issue.vol## 6 ##issue.no## 1 (2023); 24–39
Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Bd. 6 Nr. 1 (2023); 24–39
Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2023); 24–39
2596-3856
op_relation https://account.sjms.nu/index.php/sms-j-sjms/article/view/178/204
https://account.sjms.nu/index.php/sms-j-sjms/article/view/178/205
https://account.sjms.nu/index.php/sms-j-sjms/article/view/178
doi:10.31374/sjms.178
op_rights Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.178
container_title Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies
container_volume 6
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
op_container_end_page 39
_version_ 1768381091983392768