Rapid and rhythmic ice sheet fluctuations in western Scandinavia 15-40 Kya–a review

• Published in: Polar Research
• Main Authors: Olsen, Lars, Sveian, Harald, van der Borg, Klaas, Bergstram, Bjørn, Broekmans, Maarten
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Norwegian Polar Institute 2002
• Subjects: Norway; Kya; Hattfjelldal; Trofors; Ice Sheet; Polar Research
• Online Access: https://polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/view/2139; https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v21i2.6483

The onshore record of Middle to Late Weichselian sediments and glacial history in Norway indicates a succession of four major ice advances alternating with rapid, considerable ice recessions and interstadial conditions. During all the glacial advances the ice sheet expanded from onshore/inland positions to the shelf areas. The basis for visualizing these variations in glaciation curves constructed along nine transects from inland to shelf, and for interpretation of the palaeoclimatic history, is the regional Quaternary stratigraphy, more than 300 datings, fossil content and some palaeomagnetic data. The methods applied in recent years for AMS radiocarbon dating of glacial sediments with low organic carbon content have given promising results with respect to accuracy and precision, and the results of such datings were an important tool for our reconstructions and for timing of the ice oscillations. The rapid and rhythmic ice fluctuations, as reconstructed in our new model, have been fairly synchronous in most parts of Norway. Ice advances commenced and culminated at 40, 30-28, 24-21 and 18-15 (14C) Kya. We describe three intervening interstadials from inland sites: Hattfjelldal I, Hattfjelldal II and Trofors. Our stratigraphical record also includes many indications of high, pre-Holocene, relative sea levels, suggesting a considerable glacioisostatic depression of western Scandinavia during the interstadials. In our glaciation model we suggest that, in addition to precipitation, the mountainous fjord and valley topography, glacial isostasy and relative sea level changes were probably more important for the size of the glacial fluctuations than were air temperature changes.