What’s better: mammography screening or systemic treatment?

At least for the past 25 years, mammography screening has been the official policy of the healthcare systems of European countries, North America and Australia. Seven huge randomized trials have shown a reduction of mortality from breast cancer (BC) by 20-35% in women 50-61 years old, accepted the i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malignant tumours
Main Authors: V. Semiglazov F., В. Семиглазов Ф.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Russian
Published: Rosoncoweb 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/94
https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2014-4-3-9
id ftjmt:oai:oai.tumors.elpub.ru:article/94
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Malignant tumours (E-Jounal)
op_collection_id ftjmt
language Russian
topic breast cancer
screening
systemic therapy
рак молочной железы
скрининг
системная терапия
spellingShingle breast cancer
screening
systemic therapy
рак молочной железы
скрининг
системная терапия
V. Semiglazov F.
В. Семиглазов Ф.
What’s better: mammography screening or systemic treatment?
topic_facet breast cancer
screening
systemic therapy
рак молочной железы
скрининг
системная терапия
description At least for the past 25 years, mammography screening has been the official policy of the healthcare systems of European countries, North America and Australia. Seven huge randomized trials have shown a reduction of mortality from breast cancer (BC) by 20-35% in women 50-61 years old, accepted the invitation to mammography screening. At the same time, some epidemiologists and other researchers in biostatistics doubt the success of mammographic screening, considering "suboptimal" randomization in some of these studies. Nordic Cochrane Centre also does not recommend this strategy to reduce mortality from breast cancer. There is no doubt that the progress of adjuvant systemic therapy (chemo-, endocrine and targeted therapy) has reduced mortality from breast cancer. Therefore, the contribution of screening and systemic therapy in reducing mortality from breast cancer has evolved in favor of therapy. Nevertheless, mammography screening still should be recommended, especially for women 50-69 years old. This strategy is confirmed by the recomendations of the European Union, ESMO (2014), and ASCO (2014). По крайней мере на протяжении последних 25 лет маммографический скрининг был официальной политикой здравоохранения европейских стран, Северной Америки и Австралии. Семь крупных рандомизированных исследований показали сокращение смертности от рака молочной железы (РМЖ) на 20–35% у женщин 50–61 лет, принявших приглашение на маммографический скрининг. В тоже самое время некоторые эпидемиологи (Goetzche, 2013; Jorgensen, 2013) и другие исследователи по биостатистике сомневаются в успехах маммографического скрининга, считая «субоптимальной» рандомизацию в некоторых из этих исследований. Нордический Кохране центр (Nordic Cochrane Centre) также не рекомендует эту стратегию для сокращения смертности от РМЖ. Нет сомнения в том, что беспрецедентный прогресс адъювантной системной терапии (эндокрино-химиотерапии, таргетного лечения) сам по себе сократил смертность от РМЖ. Поэтому вклад скрининга и системной терапии в сокращении смертности от РМЖ эволюционировал в пользу терапии. Тем не менее маммографический скрининг по-прежнему следует рекомендовать, особен6но для женщин 50–69 лет. Эта стратегия подтверждается указаниями Европейского Союза, ESMO (2014) и ASCO (2014).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author V. Semiglazov F.
В. Семиглазов Ф.
author_facet V. Semiglazov F.
В. Семиглазов Ф.
author_sort V. Semiglazov F.
title What’s better: mammography screening or systemic treatment?
title_short What’s better: mammography screening or systemic treatment?
title_full What’s better: mammography screening or systemic treatment?
title_fullStr What’s better: mammography screening or systemic treatment?
title_full_unstemmed What’s better: mammography screening or systemic treatment?
title_sort what’s better: mammography screening or systemic treatment?
publisher Rosoncoweb
publishDate 2015
url https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/94
https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2014-4-3-9
genre Крайн*
genre_facet Крайн*
op_source Malignant tumours; № 4 (2014); 3-9
Злокачественные опухоли; № 4 (2014); 3-9
2587-6813
2224-5057
op_relation https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/94/98
Gotzsche P., Jorgensen K. Screening for breast cancer with mammography (review). The Cochrane collaboration. The Cochrane library 2013, issne G., pp.1–17.
Miller A. B., Wall C., Baines CJ. Twenty five year follow up breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian Breast Screening Study: Randomized Screening trial. BMJ.2014-vol 348-pp.366.
Kalager M,. Loberg M, Bretthauer M., Adami H. Comparative analysis of breast cancer mortality following mammography screening in Denmark and Norway. Ann Oncol., 2014-vol.25. — pp.1137–1143.
Bleyer A., Welch H. G. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence. N Eng J Med 2012. — vol. 367. — pp.1998–2005.
Baum M. Harms from breast cancer screening outweigh benefits if death caused by treatment included. BMJ 2013. Vol. —346. — pp 1385.
Irvin V., Kaplan R. Screening mammography and breast cancer mortality: meta — analysis of Quasi-experimental studies. Plos ONE. 2014. — vol. 9. — pp.105–115.
Toriola A. T., Colditz G.A, Trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality in the United Stales: implication for prevention. Breast cancer Res Trial. 2013. — vol 138-pp.665–673.
Sun E, Jena AB, Lakdawalle D, et al. The contributions of improved therapy and earlier detection to cancer survival gains 1988–2000. Forum Health Econ Policy, 2010. Vol 132.— pp.1195.
Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group: Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet, 2005-Vol. — 365-pp.1687–1717.
Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group, (Peto R, Davies C. et al): Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: Meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100.000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet, 2012 — Vol. — 379-pp.432–444.
Marmot MG., Altman DG., Cameron DA. et al. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br J Cancer, 2013-vol. 108 (11). — pp.2205–2240.
Humphrey L. J., Helfand M., Chan BK et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2012 — Vol. 137 (5). — pp. 347–360.
Tabar L., Duffy SW. Yen M. F., et al. All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: support for breast cancer mortality as an end point. J Med Screen.2002-Vol.9 — pp.159–162.
Morris E. Rethinking breast cancer screening: ultra fast breast magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2014-Vol. — 32.pp. —2281–2283.
Tabar L., Vita K. B., Chen TH et. al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology, 2011. — Vol.260 — pp. 658–663.
Kopans D. B. Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science. Oncologist, 2014. — Vol.17-pp.107–112.
Morris EA: Diagnostic breast MR imaging: Current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin n Am, 2010, Vol. — 18:57:-74.
Kuhl CL, Schrading S, Strobel K, et al: Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): First postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection — A novel approach to breast screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol, 2014. Vol. — 32 pp. 2304–2310.
Saadatmand S. Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Rutgers EJ. Et. Al: Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging. J Natl Cancer Inst., 2013 vol. — 105 pp.1314–1321.
Burton R., Bell R. The global challenge of reducing breast cancer mortality. The Oncologist, 2013 Vol. — 18. — pp. 1200–1202.
Mittra L., Mishra G. A., Singh S. et al. A cluster randomised, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India. Int J Cancer, 2010. — Vol. 126. — pp. 926–984.
https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/94
doi:10.18027/2224-5057-2014-4-3-9
op_rights Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Авторы, публикующие статьи в данном журнале, соглашаются на следующее:Авторы сохраняют за собой автороские права и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2014-4-3-9
container_title Malignant tumours
container_issue 4
container_start_page 3
_version_ 1766238842865582080
spelling ftjmt:oai:oai.tumors.elpub.ru:article/94 2023-05-15T18:46:57+02:00 What’s better: mammography screening or systemic treatment? ЧТО ЛУЧШЕ: МАММОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ СКРИНИНГ ИЛИ СИСТЕМНОЕ ЛЕЧЕНИЕ? V. Semiglazov F. В. Семиглазов Ф. 2015-05-21 application/pdf https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/94 https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2014-4-3-9 rus rus Rosoncoweb https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/94/98 Gotzsche P., Jorgensen K. Screening for breast cancer with mammography (review). The Cochrane collaboration. The Cochrane library 2013, issne G., pp.1–17. Miller A. B., Wall C., Baines CJ. Twenty five year follow up breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian Breast Screening Study: Randomized Screening trial. BMJ.2014-vol 348-pp.366. Kalager M,. Loberg M, Bretthauer M., Adami H. Comparative analysis of breast cancer mortality following mammography screening in Denmark and Norway. Ann Oncol., 2014-vol.25. — pp.1137–1143. Bleyer A., Welch H. G. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence. N Eng J Med 2012. — vol. 367. — pp.1998–2005. Baum M. Harms from breast cancer screening outweigh benefits if death caused by treatment included. BMJ 2013. Vol. —346. — pp 1385. Irvin V., Kaplan R. Screening mammography and breast cancer mortality: meta — analysis of Quasi-experimental studies. Plos ONE. 2014. — vol. 9. — pp.105–115. Toriola A. T., Colditz G.A, Trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality in the United Stales: implication for prevention. Breast cancer Res Trial. 2013. — vol 138-pp.665–673. Sun E, Jena AB, Lakdawalle D, et al. The contributions of improved therapy and earlier detection to cancer survival gains 1988–2000. Forum Health Econ Policy, 2010. Vol 132.— pp.1195. Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group: Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet, 2005-Vol. — 365-pp.1687–1717. Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group, (Peto R, Davies C. et al): Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: Meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100.000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet, 2012 — Vol. — 379-pp.432–444. Marmot MG., Altman DG., Cameron DA. et al. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br J Cancer, 2013-vol. 108 (11). — pp.2205–2240. Humphrey L. J., Helfand M., Chan BK et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2012 — Vol. 137 (5). — pp. 347–360. Tabar L., Duffy SW. Yen M. F., et al. All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: support for breast cancer mortality as an end point. J Med Screen.2002-Vol.9 — pp.159–162. Morris E. Rethinking breast cancer screening: ultra fast breast magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2014-Vol. — 32.pp. —2281–2283. Tabar L., Vita K. B., Chen TH et. al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology, 2011. — Vol.260 — pp. 658–663. Kopans D. B. Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science. Oncologist, 2014. — Vol.17-pp.107–112. Morris EA: Diagnostic breast MR imaging: Current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin n Am, 2010, Vol. — 18:57:-74. Kuhl CL, Schrading S, Strobel K, et al: Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): First postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection — A novel approach to breast screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol, 2014. Vol. — 32 pp. 2304–2310. Saadatmand S. Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Rutgers EJ. Et. Al: Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging. J Natl Cancer Inst., 2013 vol. — 105 pp.1314–1321. Burton R., Bell R. The global challenge of reducing breast cancer mortality. The Oncologist, 2013 Vol. — 18. — pp. 1200–1202. Mittra L., Mishra G. A., Singh S. et al. A cluster randomised, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India. Int J Cancer, 2010. — Vol. 126. — pp. 926–984. https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/94 doi:10.18027/2224-5057-2014-4-3-9 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). Авторы, публикующие статьи в данном журнале, соглашаются на следующее:Авторы сохраняют за собой автороские права и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access). CC-BY Malignant tumours; № 4 (2014); 3-9 Злокачественные опухоли; № 4 (2014); 3-9 2587-6813 2224-5057 breast cancer screening systemic therapy рак молочной железы скрининг системная терапия info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2015 ftjmt https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2014-4-3-9 2021-06-17T15:16:02Z At least for the past 25 years, mammography screening has been the official policy of the healthcare systems of European countries, North America and Australia. Seven huge randomized trials have shown a reduction of mortality from breast cancer (BC) by 20-35% in women 50-61 years old, accepted the invitation to mammography screening. At the same time, some epidemiologists and other researchers in biostatistics doubt the success of mammographic screening, considering "suboptimal" randomization in some of these studies. Nordic Cochrane Centre also does not recommend this strategy to reduce mortality from breast cancer. There is no doubt that the progress of adjuvant systemic therapy (chemo-, endocrine and targeted therapy) has reduced mortality from breast cancer. Therefore, the contribution of screening and systemic therapy in reducing mortality from breast cancer has evolved in favor of therapy. Nevertheless, mammography screening still should be recommended, especially for women 50-69 years old. This strategy is confirmed by the recomendations of the European Union, ESMO (2014), and ASCO (2014). По крайней мере на протяжении последних 25 лет маммографический скрининг был официальной политикой здравоохранения европейских стран, Северной Америки и Австралии. Семь крупных рандомизированных исследований показали сокращение смертности от рака молочной железы (РМЖ) на 20–35% у женщин 50–61 лет, принявших приглашение на маммографический скрининг. В тоже самое время некоторые эпидемиологи (Goetzche, 2013; Jorgensen, 2013) и другие исследователи по биостатистике сомневаются в успехах маммографического скрининга, считая «субоптимальной» рандомизацию в некоторых из этих исследований. Нордический Кохране центр (Nordic Cochrane Centre) также не рекомендует эту стратегию для сокращения смертности от РМЖ. Нет сомнения в том, что беспрецедентный прогресс адъювантной системной терапии (эндокрино-химиотерапии, таргетного лечения) сам по себе сократил смертность от РМЖ. Поэтому вклад скрининга и системной терапии в сокращении смертности от РМЖ эволюционировал в пользу терапии. Тем не менее маммографический скрининг по-прежнему следует рекомендовать, особен6но для женщин 50–69 лет. Эта стратегия подтверждается указаниями Европейского Союза, ESMO (2014) и ASCO (2014). Article in Journal/Newspaper Крайн* Malignant tumours (E-Jounal) Malignant tumours 4 3