Moving Beyond Widdowson and Howard: Traditional Knowledge as an Approach to Knowledge

Traditional Indigenous knowledge is increasingly recognised and incorporated both in and beyond the university. In Canada's Northwest Territories, this recognition has been manifest as policy mandating that scientists incorporate the knowledge of elders and hunters into their environmental and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Walsh, David
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Carumba Institute, QUT, Brisbane, Australia 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/66
id ftjintjcj:oai:ojs2.journal.library.qut.edu.au:article/66
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjintjcj:oai:ojs2.journal.library.qut.edu.au:article/66 2024-06-23T07:55:43+00:00 Moving Beyond Widdowson and Howard: Traditional Knowledge as an Approach to Knowledge Walsh, David 2011-01-01 application/pdf https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/66 eng eng Carumba Institute, QUT, Brisbane, Australia https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/66/66 https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/66 International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2011); 2-11 1837-0144 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2011 ftjintjcj 2024-05-27T03:03:22Z Traditional Indigenous knowledge is increasingly recognised and incorporated both in and beyond the university. In Canada's Northwest Territories, this recognition has been manifest as policy mandating that scientists incorporate the knowledge of elders and hunters into their environmental and climate change research. However, the recognition of traditional knowledge has not always been met with acceptance and understanding. This article analyses the book Disrobing the Aboriginal Industry by Francis Widdowson and Albert Howard (2008), which is highly critical of traditional knowledge. Widdowson and Howard advocate for cultural assimilation by arguing that traditional knowledge is incompatible with, and inferior to, modern Western science. In their line of reasoning, the current application of traditional knowledge transplants ‗neolithic‘ culture into modernity and stunts the ability of Aboriginal peoples to participate in modern Canadian (and dominant Western) culture. While other critics argue against the racialised and inflammatory discourse, I try to salvage insight from the authors' misunderstandings; Widdowson and Howard's failed grasp on traditional knowledge actually illuminates a fundamental problem. The problem is not in meshing Indigenous and scientific knowledge; rather, the problem is in bridging the gap between Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing. I engage the work of A. Irving Halowell, Tim Ingold and scholars of Dene knowledge and traditional lifeways to discuss how Indigenous religion and worldview create a unique approach to knowledge. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northwest Territories International Journal for Crime and Justice (Queensland University of Technology) Northwest Territories
institution Open Polar
collection International Journal for Crime and Justice (Queensland University of Technology)
op_collection_id ftjintjcj
language English
description Traditional Indigenous knowledge is increasingly recognised and incorporated both in and beyond the university. In Canada's Northwest Territories, this recognition has been manifest as policy mandating that scientists incorporate the knowledge of elders and hunters into their environmental and climate change research. However, the recognition of traditional knowledge has not always been met with acceptance and understanding. This article analyses the book Disrobing the Aboriginal Industry by Francis Widdowson and Albert Howard (2008), which is highly critical of traditional knowledge. Widdowson and Howard advocate for cultural assimilation by arguing that traditional knowledge is incompatible with, and inferior to, modern Western science. In their line of reasoning, the current application of traditional knowledge transplants ‗neolithic‘ culture into modernity and stunts the ability of Aboriginal peoples to participate in modern Canadian (and dominant Western) culture. While other critics argue against the racialised and inflammatory discourse, I try to salvage insight from the authors' misunderstandings; Widdowson and Howard's failed grasp on traditional knowledge actually illuminates a fundamental problem. The problem is not in meshing Indigenous and scientific knowledge; rather, the problem is in bridging the gap between Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing. I engage the work of A. Irving Halowell, Tim Ingold and scholars of Dene knowledge and traditional lifeways to discuss how Indigenous religion and worldview create a unique approach to knowledge.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Walsh, David
spellingShingle Walsh, David
Moving Beyond Widdowson and Howard: Traditional Knowledge as an Approach to Knowledge
author_facet Walsh, David
author_sort Walsh, David
title Moving Beyond Widdowson and Howard: Traditional Knowledge as an Approach to Knowledge
title_short Moving Beyond Widdowson and Howard: Traditional Knowledge as an Approach to Knowledge
title_full Moving Beyond Widdowson and Howard: Traditional Knowledge as an Approach to Knowledge
title_fullStr Moving Beyond Widdowson and Howard: Traditional Knowledge as an Approach to Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Moving Beyond Widdowson and Howard: Traditional Knowledge as an Approach to Knowledge
title_sort moving beyond widdowson and howard: traditional knowledge as an approach to knowledge
publisher Carumba Institute, QUT, Brisbane, Australia
publishDate 2011
url https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/66
geographic Northwest Territories
geographic_facet Northwest Territories
genre Northwest Territories
genre_facet Northwest Territories
op_source International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2011); 2-11
1837-0144
op_relation https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/66/66
https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/66
_version_ 1802648386831122432