Canadian and Australian First Nations: Decolonising knowledge
This article explores Indigenous standpoint theory in Australia in the context of postcolonialism and some of its aspects influencing Canadian First Nations scholarship. I look at how cultural metanarratives are ideologically informed and act to lock out of scholarship other ways of knowing, being a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Carumba Institute, QUT, Brisbane, Australia
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/557 |
id |
ftjintjcj:oai:ojs2.journal.library.qut.edu.au:article/557 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftjintjcj:oai:ojs2.journal.library.qut.edu.au:article/557 2024-06-23T07:52:48+00:00 Canadian and Australian First Nations: Decolonising knowledge Arnold, Josie 2018-08-10 application/pdf https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/557 eng eng Carumba Institute, QUT, Brisbane, Australia https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/557/417 https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/557 Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies; Vol 11 No 1 (2018); 3-20 1837-0144 decolonisation Indigenous knowledge practice-led research info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2018 ftjintjcj 2024-05-27T03:03:22Z This article explores Indigenous standpoint theory in Australia in the context of postcolonialism and some of its aspects influencing Canadian First Nations scholarship. I look at how cultural metanarratives are ideologically informed and act to lock out of scholarship other ways of knowing, being and doing. I argue that they influence knowledge and education so as to ratify Eurowestern dominant knowledge constructs. I develop insights into redressing this imbalance through advocating two-way learning processes for border crossing between Indigenous axiologies, ontologies and epistemologies, and dominant Western ones. In doing so, I note that decolonisation of knowledge sits alongside decolonisation itself but has been a very slow process in the academy. I also note that this does not mean that decolonisation of knowledge is always necessarily an oppositional process in scholarship, proposing that practice-led research (PLR) provides one model for credentialling Indigenous practitioner-knowledge within scholarship. The article reiterates the position of alienation in their own lands that such colonisation implements again and in an influential and ongoing way. The article further proposes that a PhD by artefact and exegesis based on PLR is potentially an inclusive model for First Nations People to enter into non-traditional research within the academy. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations International Journal for Crime and Justice (Queensland University of Technology) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
International Journal for Crime and Justice (Queensland University of Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftjintjcj |
language |
English |
topic |
decolonisation Indigenous knowledge practice-led research |
spellingShingle |
decolonisation Indigenous knowledge practice-led research Arnold, Josie Canadian and Australian First Nations: Decolonising knowledge |
topic_facet |
decolonisation Indigenous knowledge practice-led research |
description |
This article explores Indigenous standpoint theory in Australia in the context of postcolonialism and some of its aspects influencing Canadian First Nations scholarship. I look at how cultural metanarratives are ideologically informed and act to lock out of scholarship other ways of knowing, being and doing. I argue that they influence knowledge and education so as to ratify Eurowestern dominant knowledge constructs. I develop insights into redressing this imbalance through advocating two-way learning processes for border crossing between Indigenous axiologies, ontologies and epistemologies, and dominant Western ones. In doing so, I note that decolonisation of knowledge sits alongside decolonisation itself but has been a very slow process in the academy. I also note that this does not mean that decolonisation of knowledge is always necessarily an oppositional process in scholarship, proposing that practice-led research (PLR) provides one model for credentialling Indigenous practitioner-knowledge within scholarship. The article reiterates the position of alienation in their own lands that such colonisation implements again and in an influential and ongoing way. The article further proposes that a PhD by artefact and exegesis based on PLR is potentially an inclusive model for First Nations People to enter into non-traditional research within the academy. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Arnold, Josie |
author_facet |
Arnold, Josie |
author_sort |
Arnold, Josie |
title |
Canadian and Australian First Nations: Decolonising knowledge |
title_short |
Canadian and Australian First Nations: Decolonising knowledge |
title_full |
Canadian and Australian First Nations: Decolonising knowledge |
title_fullStr |
Canadian and Australian First Nations: Decolonising knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Canadian and Australian First Nations: Decolonising knowledge |
title_sort |
canadian and australian first nations: decolonising knowledge |
publisher |
Carumba Institute, QUT, Brisbane, Australia |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/557 |
genre |
First Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations |
op_source |
International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies; Vol 11 No 1 (2018); 3-20 1837-0144 |
op_relation |
https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/557/417 https://ijcis.qut.edu.au/article/view/557 |
op_rights |
Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
_version_ |
1802644205845086208 |