Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway

This paper addresses the perceptions of actors of protected areas in Norway about a co-management regime at the local level. The analysis is based on quantitative data from surveys of actors of eight protected areas in northern Norway. The results show that the two strongest determinants that explai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of the Commons
Main Authors: Fedreheim, Gunn Elin, Blanco, Esther
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/749
https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749
id ftjijotc:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/749
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjijotc:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/749 2023-10-09T21:54:27+02:00 Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway Fedreheim, Gunn Elin Blanco, Esther 2017-10-16 application/xml application/pdf https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/749 https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 eng eng Ubiquity Press https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/749/681 https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/749/682 https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/749 doi:10.18352/ijc.749 Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 International Journal of the Commons; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2017); 754–773 1875-0281 co-management governance land planning nature conservation social-ecological systems info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2017 ftjijotc https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 2023-09-18T07:39:18Z This paper addresses the perceptions of actors of protected areas in Norway about a co-management regime at the local level. The analysis is based on quantitative data from surveys of actors of eight protected areas in northern Norway. The results show that the two strongest determinants that explain actors' initial support of the governance change as a means to alleviate conflict are (i) the relationship of actors to the protected areas in terms of knowledge of the protected areas and mental modes on conservation and (ii) the economic relevance of the areas for them. Traditionally, other sociocultural variables such as indigenous background (Sámi), age, and gender have been considered relevant and were also identified as significant attributes that define preferences for conservation management alternatives. We build on the quantitative findings on actors’ perceptions to develop a broader discussion on the relationship of the new management model for protected areas implemented and conflict resolution on land conservation in the country. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway International Journal of the Commons Norway International Journal of the Commons 11 2 754
institution Open Polar
collection International Journal of the Commons
op_collection_id ftjijotc
language English
topic co-management
governance
land planning
nature conservation
social-ecological systems
spellingShingle co-management
governance
land planning
nature conservation
social-ecological systems
Fedreheim, Gunn Elin
Blanco, Esther
Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway
topic_facet co-management
governance
land planning
nature conservation
social-ecological systems
description This paper addresses the perceptions of actors of protected areas in Norway about a co-management regime at the local level. The analysis is based on quantitative data from surveys of actors of eight protected areas in northern Norway. The results show that the two strongest determinants that explain actors' initial support of the governance change as a means to alleviate conflict are (i) the relationship of actors to the protected areas in terms of knowledge of the protected areas and mental modes on conservation and (ii) the economic relevance of the areas for them. Traditionally, other sociocultural variables such as indigenous background (Sámi), age, and gender have been considered relevant and were also identified as significant attributes that define preferences for conservation management alternatives. We build on the quantitative findings on actors’ perceptions to develop a broader discussion on the relationship of the new management model for protected areas implemented and conflict resolution on land conservation in the country.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Fedreheim, Gunn Elin
Blanco, Esther
author_facet Fedreheim, Gunn Elin
Blanco, Esther
author_sort Fedreheim, Gunn Elin
title Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway
title_short Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway
title_full Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway
title_fullStr Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway
title_sort co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: experiences in norway
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2017
url https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/749
https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Northern Norway
genre_facet Northern Norway
op_source International Journal of the Commons; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2017); 754–773
1875-0281
op_relation https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/749/681
https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/749/682
https://account.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/up-j-ijc/article/view/749
doi:10.18352/ijc.749
op_rights Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749
container_title International Journal of the Commons
container_volume 11
container_issue 2
container_start_page 754
_version_ 1779318023472021504