Freedom of Navigation in the Arctic: Options for Deterring Russia's Excessive Maritime Claims

As climate change opens up new lanes of international commerce from melting sea ice in the Arctic, the region has growing importance to American strategy. The newly viable Northern Sea Route (NSR) through the Arctic Ocean around Russia will prove to be one of the 21st century’s most important commer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sims, Michael "Mac"
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/66913
id ftjhuniv:oai:jscholarship.library.jhu.edu:1774.2/66913
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjhuniv:oai:jscholarship.library.jhu.edu:1774.2/66913 2023-09-26T15:13:05+02:00 Freedom of Navigation in the Arctic: Options for Deterring Russia's Excessive Maritime Claims Sims, Michael "Mac" 2022-05 application/pdf http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/66913 en_US eng http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/66913 maritime claims arctic FONOP Other 2022 ftjhuniv 2023-08-28T18:02:40Z As climate change opens up new lanes of international commerce from melting sea ice in the Arctic, the region has growing importance to American strategy. The newly viable Northern Sea Route (NSR) through the Arctic Ocean around Russia will prove to be one of the 21st century’s most important commercial routes as the fastest way to move goods between the North Atlantic and the North Pacific. However, the Russian Federation has made excessive maritime claims, claiming that most of the NSR is an internal waterway, and enforcing a stringent regulatory regime on any vessel wishing to make the transit. This paper presents the option of conducting Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOP) in the Arctic to deter excessive Russian claims and to reassure the United States’ allies of a commitment to preserving a rules-based order in the Arctic. This study analyzes the history of Russian maritime claims and the efficacy of the larger FONOP program, using FONOPs in the South China Sea as a case study to generate a pro and con policy analysis framework. Based on these factors, this paper concludes that the US should begin FONOPs through the Arctic within the next five years, accomplishing the stated policy goal with the most limited military escalation possible. Furthermore, since the commercial activity in the Arctic will only increase over time, this study finds that waiting to tackle this problem only increases the costs associated with finding a solution in the long term. Other/Unknown Material Arctic Arctic Ocean Climate change North Atlantic Northern Sea Route Sea ice Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore: JScholarship Arctic Arctic Ocean Lanes ENVELOPE(18.933,18.933,69.617,69.617) Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore: JScholarship
op_collection_id ftjhuniv
language English
topic maritime claims
arctic
FONOP
spellingShingle maritime claims
arctic
FONOP
Sims, Michael "Mac"
Freedom of Navigation in the Arctic: Options for Deterring Russia's Excessive Maritime Claims
topic_facet maritime claims
arctic
FONOP
description As climate change opens up new lanes of international commerce from melting sea ice in the Arctic, the region has growing importance to American strategy. The newly viable Northern Sea Route (NSR) through the Arctic Ocean around Russia will prove to be one of the 21st century’s most important commercial routes as the fastest way to move goods between the North Atlantic and the North Pacific. However, the Russian Federation has made excessive maritime claims, claiming that most of the NSR is an internal waterway, and enforcing a stringent regulatory regime on any vessel wishing to make the transit. This paper presents the option of conducting Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOP) in the Arctic to deter excessive Russian claims and to reassure the United States’ allies of a commitment to preserving a rules-based order in the Arctic. This study analyzes the history of Russian maritime claims and the efficacy of the larger FONOP program, using FONOPs in the South China Sea as a case study to generate a pro and con policy analysis framework. Based on these factors, this paper concludes that the US should begin FONOPs through the Arctic within the next five years, accomplishing the stated policy goal with the most limited military escalation possible. Furthermore, since the commercial activity in the Arctic will only increase over time, this study finds that waiting to tackle this problem only increases the costs associated with finding a solution in the long term.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Sims, Michael "Mac"
author_facet Sims, Michael "Mac"
author_sort Sims, Michael "Mac"
title Freedom of Navigation in the Arctic: Options for Deterring Russia's Excessive Maritime Claims
title_short Freedom of Navigation in the Arctic: Options for Deterring Russia's Excessive Maritime Claims
title_full Freedom of Navigation in the Arctic: Options for Deterring Russia's Excessive Maritime Claims
title_fullStr Freedom of Navigation in the Arctic: Options for Deterring Russia's Excessive Maritime Claims
title_full_unstemmed Freedom of Navigation in the Arctic: Options for Deterring Russia's Excessive Maritime Claims
title_sort freedom of navigation in the arctic: options for deterring russia's excessive maritime claims
publishDate 2022
url http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/66913
long_lat ENVELOPE(18.933,18.933,69.617,69.617)
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Lanes
Pacific
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Lanes
Pacific
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Climate change
North Atlantic
Northern Sea Route
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Climate change
North Atlantic
Northern Sea Route
Sea ice
op_relation http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/66913
_version_ 1778133548963725312