Ideas of Alexei Nikishenkov about the Course of “Primitive Society”: Big Problems or Problems of Big Value?
Alexei Nikishenkov started teaching the Prehistory course in 1986. It was quite clear to him that the prehistoric societies covered this course were diverse and not homogenous. Nikishenkov diverged from the approach presented in the three-volume book “The History of the Primitive Society” edited by...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
МГУ имени М.В.Ломоносова (Lomonosov Moscow State University)
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/view/66 |
id |
ftjhs:oai:ojs.www.historystudies.msu.ru:article/66 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftjhs:oai:ojs.www.historystudies.msu.ru:article/66 2023-07-30T04:04:31+02:00 Ideas of Alexei Nikishenkov about the Course of “Primitive Society”: Big Problems or Problems of Big Value? Взгляды А.А. Никишенкова на «Историю первобытного общества»: большие проблемы для антропологии или антропологические проблемы большой важности? Туторский, Андрей Владимирович 2016-06-10 text/html application/pdf http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/view/66 rus rus МГУ имени М.В.Ломоносова (Lomonosov Moscow State University) http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/view/66/177 http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/view/66/157 http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/view/66 (c) 2016 Исторические Исследования http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Исторические Исследования; № 4 (2016): Исторические исследования; 111-124 History Studies; № 4 (2016): Исторические исследования; 111-124 2410-4671 prehistory simple societies contemporary tribes teaching anthropology tribal life prehistory as epistemology первобытность теория первобытности первобытность как эпистемология преподавание антропологии социальная антропология info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2016 ftjhs 2023-07-11T16:58:12Z Alexei Nikishenkov started teaching the Prehistory course in 1986. It was quite clear to him that the prehistoric societies covered this course were diverse and not homogenous. Nikishenkov diverged from the approach presented in the three-volume book “The History of the Primitive Society” edited by Valeriy Alexeev, Abraham Pershitz and Yuriy Semenov, in which different historical, geographical, and economic societies were merged together to form the structure of a nonexistent “Primitive-State Society.” The facts about Australian aboriginals were also applied to Paleolithic Era hunters and gatherers, and the facts about the Inuit people were used as a basis to reconstruct the Neanderthal’s way of life.At the same time, the very facts about the way of life of tribes and peoples from classical anthropological ethnographies – such as the Trobriand Islanders, Tikopia, Dobe !Kung, Yanomamö, Papua-New Guinea highlanders and coast dwellers, among others – are of crucial importance for ethnographical/anthropological education. In history education, the scientific problems of the “prestige economy,” “segmentary society”, “classificatory kinship”, “mythology”, “totemism”, and many others are only discussed in a “History of Primitive Society” class. As a result, discontinuation of this course causes more negative than positive results.The course’s problematic can also become an epistemological tool to investigate contemporary societies such as international corporations, small companies, prison or criminal cultures. A clear understanding of what truly constitutes the culture and social structures of classical anthropological-cases tribes is a necessary condition for the successful investigation of new types of societies. В статье рассматриваются взгляды А. А. Никишенкова на курс «История первобытного общества». Указывается двойственность этих взглядов. С одной стороны, портрет первобытного человека – это сочетание несочетаемого: культуры маори Новой Зеландии, папуасов Тробриандских островов, эскимосов Гренландии, бушменов ... Article in Journal/Newspaper inuit History Studies (E-Journal - Faculty of History of Lomonosov Moscow State University) Kung ENVELOPE(-132.571,-132.571,54.050,54.050) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
History Studies (E-Journal - Faculty of History of Lomonosov Moscow State University) |
op_collection_id |
ftjhs |
language |
Russian |
topic |
prehistory simple societies contemporary tribes teaching anthropology tribal life prehistory as epistemology первобытность теория первобытности первобытность как эпистемология преподавание антропологии социальная антропология |
spellingShingle |
prehistory simple societies contemporary tribes teaching anthropology tribal life prehistory as epistemology первобытность теория первобытности первобытность как эпистемология преподавание антропологии социальная антропология Туторский, Андрей Владимирович Ideas of Alexei Nikishenkov about the Course of “Primitive Society”: Big Problems or Problems of Big Value? |
topic_facet |
prehistory simple societies contemporary tribes teaching anthropology tribal life prehistory as epistemology первобытность теория первобытности первобытность как эпистемология преподавание антропологии социальная антропология |
description |
Alexei Nikishenkov started teaching the Prehistory course in 1986. It was quite clear to him that the prehistoric societies covered this course were diverse and not homogenous. Nikishenkov diverged from the approach presented in the three-volume book “The History of the Primitive Society” edited by Valeriy Alexeev, Abraham Pershitz and Yuriy Semenov, in which different historical, geographical, and economic societies were merged together to form the structure of a nonexistent “Primitive-State Society.” The facts about Australian aboriginals were also applied to Paleolithic Era hunters and gatherers, and the facts about the Inuit people were used as a basis to reconstruct the Neanderthal’s way of life.At the same time, the very facts about the way of life of tribes and peoples from classical anthropological ethnographies – such as the Trobriand Islanders, Tikopia, Dobe !Kung, Yanomamö, Papua-New Guinea highlanders and coast dwellers, among others – are of crucial importance for ethnographical/anthropological education. In history education, the scientific problems of the “prestige economy,” “segmentary society”, “classificatory kinship”, “mythology”, “totemism”, and many others are only discussed in a “History of Primitive Society” class. As a result, discontinuation of this course causes more negative than positive results.The course’s problematic can also become an epistemological tool to investigate contemporary societies such as international corporations, small companies, prison or criminal cultures. A clear understanding of what truly constitutes the culture and social structures of classical anthropological-cases tribes is a necessary condition for the successful investigation of new types of societies. В статье рассматриваются взгляды А. А. Никишенкова на курс «История первобытного общества». Указывается двойственность этих взглядов. С одной стороны, портрет первобытного человека – это сочетание несочетаемого: культуры маори Новой Зеландии, папуасов Тробриандских островов, эскимосов Гренландии, бушменов ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Туторский, Андрей Владимирович |
author_facet |
Туторский, Андрей Владимирович |
author_sort |
Туторский, Андрей Владимирович |
title |
Ideas of Alexei Nikishenkov about the Course of “Primitive Society”: Big Problems or Problems of Big Value? |
title_short |
Ideas of Alexei Nikishenkov about the Course of “Primitive Society”: Big Problems or Problems of Big Value? |
title_full |
Ideas of Alexei Nikishenkov about the Course of “Primitive Society”: Big Problems or Problems of Big Value? |
title_fullStr |
Ideas of Alexei Nikishenkov about the Course of “Primitive Society”: Big Problems or Problems of Big Value? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ideas of Alexei Nikishenkov about the Course of “Primitive Society”: Big Problems or Problems of Big Value? |
title_sort |
ideas of alexei nikishenkov about the course of “primitive society”: big problems or problems of big value? |
publisher |
МГУ имени М.В.Ломоносова (Lomonosov Moscow State University) |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/view/66 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-132.571,-132.571,54.050,54.050) |
geographic |
Kung |
geographic_facet |
Kung |
genre |
inuit |
genre_facet |
inuit |
op_source |
Исторические Исследования; № 4 (2016): Исторические исследования; 111-124 History Studies; № 4 (2016): Исторические исследования; 111-124 2410-4671 |
op_relation |
http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/view/66/177 http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/view/66/157 http://www.historystudies.msu.ru/ojs2/index.php/ISIS/article/view/66 |
op_rights |
(c) 2016 Исторические Исследования http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
_version_ |
1772816032478527488 |