“Letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations

We studied a case of failure in applying traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in comanagement as the basis for formal hunting regulations. We based the study on the Porcupine Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) Herd “let the leaders pass” policy, established for the Dempster Highway of the Western Canadia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Padilla, Elisabeth, Kofinas, Gary P.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art7/
id ftjecolog:oai:.www.ecologyandsociety.org:article/5999
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjecolog:oai:.www.ecologyandsociety.org:article/5999 2023-05-15T15:07:50+02:00 “Letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations Padilla, Elisabeth Kofinas, Gary P. 2014-04-14 text/html application/pdf http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art7/ en eng Resilience Alliance Ecology and Society; Vol. 19, No. 2 (2014) caribou; comanagement; traditional ecological knowledge; wildlife management Peer-Reviewed Reports 2014 ftjecolog 2019-04-09T11:22:54Z We studied a case of failure in applying traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in comanagement as the basis for formal hunting regulations. We based the study on the Porcupine Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) Herd “let the leaders pass” policy, established for the Dempster Highway of the Western Canadian Arctic, and identified conditions creating barriers in the successful application of TEK through comanagement. Stated as propositions, identified barriers include: (1) the context-specific nature of TEK limits its application in resource management regulations; (2) changes in traditional authority systems, hunting technology, and the social organization of harvesting caribou affect the effectiveness of TEK approaches in a contemporary social setting; (3) indigenous efforts toward self-government and political autonomy limit regional comanagement consensus in a heterogeneous cultural landscape; (4) the mismatch of agency enforcement of hunting regulations and TEK-based education is problematic. We analyzed the case through four historical phases of caribou management, complementing the study with a literature review of TEK and wildlife comanagement to explain why TEK integration of caribou leaders in regulatory resource management fell short of success. Identifying and understanding the social dynamics related to these barriers make apparent solutions for transforming the comanagement process. Other/Unknown Material Arctic Rangifer tarandus Unknown Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftjecolog
language English
topic caribou; comanagement; traditional ecological knowledge; wildlife management
spellingShingle caribou; comanagement; traditional ecological knowledge; wildlife management
Padilla, Elisabeth
Kofinas, Gary P.
“Letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations
topic_facet caribou; comanagement; traditional ecological knowledge; wildlife management
description We studied a case of failure in applying traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in comanagement as the basis for formal hunting regulations. We based the study on the Porcupine Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) Herd “let the leaders pass” policy, established for the Dempster Highway of the Western Canadian Arctic, and identified conditions creating barriers in the successful application of TEK through comanagement. Stated as propositions, identified barriers include: (1) the context-specific nature of TEK limits its application in resource management regulations; (2) changes in traditional authority systems, hunting technology, and the social organization of harvesting caribou affect the effectiveness of TEK approaches in a contemporary social setting; (3) indigenous efforts toward self-government and political autonomy limit regional comanagement consensus in a heterogeneous cultural landscape; (4) the mismatch of agency enforcement of hunting regulations and TEK-based education is problematic. We analyzed the case through four historical phases of caribou management, complementing the study with a literature review of TEK and wildlife comanagement to explain why TEK integration of caribou leaders in regulatory resource management fell short of success. Identifying and understanding the social dynamics related to these barriers make apparent solutions for transforming the comanagement process.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Padilla, Elisabeth
Kofinas, Gary P.
author_facet Padilla, Elisabeth
Kofinas, Gary P.
author_sort Padilla, Elisabeth
title “Letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations
title_short “Letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations
title_full “Letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations
title_fullStr “Letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations
title_full_unstemmed “Letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations
title_sort “letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2014
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art7/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Rangifer tarandus
genre_facet Arctic
Rangifer tarandus
op_source Ecology and Society; Vol. 19, No. 2 (2014)
_version_ 1766339256891998208