A Social–Ecological System Approach to Analyze Stakeholders’ Interactions within a Large-Scale Rangeland Restoration Program

Large-scale restoration projects are normally part of a complex social–ecological system where restoration goals are shaped by governmental policies, managed by the surrounding governance system, and implemented by the related actors. The process of efficiently restoring degraded ecosystems is, ther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petursdottir, Thorunn, Arnalds, Olafur, Baker, Susan, Montanarella, Luca
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss2/art29/
_version_ 1821555195502395392
author Petursdottir, Thorunn
Arnalds, Olafur
Baker, Susan
Montanarella, Luca
author_facet Petursdottir, Thorunn
Arnalds, Olafur
Baker, Susan
Montanarella, Luca
author_sort Petursdottir, Thorunn
collection Unknown
description Large-scale restoration projects are normally part of a complex social–ecological system where restoration goals are shaped by governmental policies, managed by the surrounding governance system, and implemented by the related actors. The process of efficiently restoring degraded ecosystems is, therefore, not only based on restoring ecological structure and functions but also relies on the functionality of the related policies, the relevant stakeholder groups, and the surrounding socioeconomic and political settings. In this research, we investigated the SES of rangeland restoration in Iceland to estimate whether social factors, such as stakeholders’ attitudes and behavior, can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of agri-environmental policies on rangeland restoration and improved land management. We used qualitative approaches, interviewing 15 stakeholders. Our results indicate that social factors such as attitude toward restoration and land management practices can be used as indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of restoration policies. They also strongly indicate that lack of functionality in the governance system of social–ecological systems can reduce the desired progress of policies related to large-scale natural resource management projects, such as rangeland restoration, and possibly halt the necessary paradigm shift among stakeholders regarding improved rangeland management.
format Other/Unknown Material
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
id ftjecolog:oai:.www.ecologyandsociety.org:article/5399
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftjecolog
op_source Ecology and Society; Vol. 18, No. 2 (2013)
publishDate 2013
publisher Resilience Alliance
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjecolog:oai:.www.ecologyandsociety.org:article/5399 2025-01-16T22:38:27+00:00 A Social–Ecological System Approach to Analyze Stakeholders’ Interactions within a Large-Scale Rangeland Restoration Program Petursdottir, Thorunn Arnalds, Olafur Baker, Susan Montanarella, Luca 2013-06-24 text/html application/pdf http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss2/art29/ en eng Resilience Alliance Ecology and Society; Vol. 18, No. 2 (2013) agri-environmental policies; ecological restoration; evaluation; natural resource management; social–ecological systems Peer-Reviewed Reports 2013 ftjecolog 2019-04-09T11:22:54Z Large-scale restoration projects are normally part of a complex social–ecological system where restoration goals are shaped by governmental policies, managed by the surrounding governance system, and implemented by the related actors. The process of efficiently restoring degraded ecosystems is, therefore, not only based on restoring ecological structure and functions but also relies on the functionality of the related policies, the relevant stakeholder groups, and the surrounding socioeconomic and political settings. In this research, we investigated the SES of rangeland restoration in Iceland to estimate whether social factors, such as stakeholders’ attitudes and behavior, can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of agri-environmental policies on rangeland restoration and improved land management. We used qualitative approaches, interviewing 15 stakeholders. Our results indicate that social factors such as attitude toward restoration and land management practices can be used as indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of restoration policies. They also strongly indicate that lack of functionality in the governance system of social–ecological systems can reduce the desired progress of policies related to large-scale natural resource management projects, such as rangeland restoration, and possibly halt the necessary paradigm shift among stakeholders regarding improved rangeland management. Other/Unknown Material Iceland Unknown
spellingShingle agri-environmental policies; ecological restoration; evaluation; natural resource management; social–ecological systems
Petursdottir, Thorunn
Arnalds, Olafur
Baker, Susan
Montanarella, Luca
A Social–Ecological System Approach to Analyze Stakeholders’ Interactions within a Large-Scale Rangeland Restoration Program
title A Social–Ecological System Approach to Analyze Stakeholders’ Interactions within a Large-Scale Rangeland Restoration Program
title_full A Social–Ecological System Approach to Analyze Stakeholders’ Interactions within a Large-Scale Rangeland Restoration Program
title_fullStr A Social–Ecological System Approach to Analyze Stakeholders’ Interactions within a Large-Scale Rangeland Restoration Program
title_full_unstemmed A Social–Ecological System Approach to Analyze Stakeholders’ Interactions within a Large-Scale Rangeland Restoration Program
title_short A Social–Ecological System Approach to Analyze Stakeholders’ Interactions within a Large-Scale Rangeland Restoration Program
title_sort social–ecological system approach to analyze stakeholders’ interactions within a large-scale rangeland restoration program
topic agri-environmental policies; ecological restoration; evaluation; natural resource management; social–ecological systems
topic_facet agri-environmental policies; ecological restoration; evaluation; natural resource management; social–ecological systems
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss2/art29/