A Case for Developing Place-Based Fire Management Strategies from Traditional Ecological Knowledge

Sustainability science promotes place-based resource management because natural processes vary among ecosystems. When local science is limited, land managers may be forced to generalize from other ecosystems that function differently. One proposed solution is to draw upon the traditional ecological...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ray, Lily A, Kolden, Crystal A, Chapin III, F. Stuart
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss3/art37/
id ftjecolog:oai:.www.ecologyandsociety.org:article/5070
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjecolog:oai:.www.ecologyandsociety.org:article/5070 2023-05-15T15:26:10+02:00 A Case for Developing Place-Based Fire Management Strategies from Traditional Ecological Knowledge Ray, Lily A Kolden, Crystal A Chapin III, F. Stuart 2012-09-27 text/html application/pdf http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss3/art37/ en eng Resilience Alliance Ecology and Society; Vol. 17, No. 3 (2012) Alaska; climate change; indigenous knowledge; traditional ecological knowledge; wildfire Peer-Reviewed Reports 2012 ftjecolog 2019-04-09T11:22:47Z Sustainability science promotes place-based resource management because natural processes vary among ecosystems. When local science is limited, land managers may be forced to generalize from other ecosystems that function differently. One proposed solution is to draw upon the traditional ecological knowledge that indigenous groups have accumulated through resource use. Integrating traditional ecological knowledge with conventional resource management is difficult, especially when the two offer competing explanations of local environments. Although resource managers may discount traditional ecological knowledge that contradicts conventional resource management, we investigate the possibility that these disagreements can arise when nonlocal resource management generalizations displace place-based science. Specifically, we compare claims about wildfires made by Athabascan forest users residing in or near the Koyukuk National Wildlife Refuge and in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service fire management plan for that refuge. We focus on two aspects of fire ecology and management: the drivers of landscape flammability and the feasibility of using wildfires and prescribed burns to achieve resource management objectives. The results indicated that some disagreements came from reliance of the federal fire management plan on generalized national narratives at the expense of place-based science. We propose that in some cases, conflicts between traditional ecological knowledge and conventional resource management, rather than indicating a dead end, can identify topics requiring in-depth, place-based research. Other/Unknown Material Athabascan Alaska Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftjecolog
language English
topic Alaska; climate change; indigenous knowledge; traditional ecological knowledge; wildfire
spellingShingle Alaska; climate change; indigenous knowledge; traditional ecological knowledge; wildfire
Ray, Lily A
Kolden, Crystal A
Chapin III, F. Stuart
A Case for Developing Place-Based Fire Management Strategies from Traditional Ecological Knowledge
topic_facet Alaska; climate change; indigenous knowledge; traditional ecological knowledge; wildfire
description Sustainability science promotes place-based resource management because natural processes vary among ecosystems. When local science is limited, land managers may be forced to generalize from other ecosystems that function differently. One proposed solution is to draw upon the traditional ecological knowledge that indigenous groups have accumulated through resource use. Integrating traditional ecological knowledge with conventional resource management is difficult, especially when the two offer competing explanations of local environments. Although resource managers may discount traditional ecological knowledge that contradicts conventional resource management, we investigate the possibility that these disagreements can arise when nonlocal resource management generalizations displace place-based science. Specifically, we compare claims about wildfires made by Athabascan forest users residing in or near the Koyukuk National Wildlife Refuge and in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service fire management plan for that refuge. We focus on two aspects of fire ecology and management: the drivers of landscape flammability and the feasibility of using wildfires and prescribed burns to achieve resource management objectives. The results indicated that some disagreements came from reliance of the federal fire management plan on generalized national narratives at the expense of place-based science. We propose that in some cases, conflicts between traditional ecological knowledge and conventional resource management, rather than indicating a dead end, can identify topics requiring in-depth, place-based research.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Ray, Lily A
Kolden, Crystal A
Chapin III, F. Stuart
author_facet Ray, Lily A
Kolden, Crystal A
Chapin III, F. Stuart
author_sort Ray, Lily A
title A Case for Developing Place-Based Fire Management Strategies from Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_short A Case for Developing Place-Based Fire Management Strategies from Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_full A Case for Developing Place-Based Fire Management Strategies from Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_fullStr A Case for Developing Place-Based Fire Management Strategies from Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed A Case for Developing Place-Based Fire Management Strategies from Traditional Ecological Knowledge
title_sort case for developing place-based fire management strategies from traditional ecological knowledge
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2012
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss3/art37/
genre Athabascan
Alaska
genre_facet Athabascan
Alaska
op_source Ecology and Society; Vol. 17, No. 3 (2012)
_version_ 1766356709408768000