Old-growth Policy

Most federal legislation and policies (e.g., the Wilderness Act, Endangered Species Act, National Forest Management Act) fail to speak directly to the need for old-growth protection, recruitment, and restoration on federal lands. Various policy and attitudinal barriers must be changed to move beyond...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vosick, Diane, Ostergren, David M, Murfitt, Lucy
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art19/
id ftjecolog:oai:.www.ecologyandsociety.org:article/2172
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjecolog:oai:.www.ecologyandsociety.org:article/2172 2023-05-15T17:43:05+02:00 Old-growth Policy Vosick, Diane Ostergren, David M Murfitt, Lucy 2007-11-16 text/html application/pdf http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art19/ en eng Resilience Alliance Ecology and Society; Vol. 12, No. 2 (2007) diameter caps; federal employee liability; institutional barriers; Mexican spotted owl; northern goshawk; preservationist philosophy; public education; wildland fire use Peer-Reviewed article 2007 ftjecolog 2019-04-09T11:22:34Z Most federal legislation and policies (e.g., the Wilderness Act, Endangered Species Act, National Forest Management Act) fail to speak directly to the need for old-growth protection, recruitment, and restoration on federal lands. Various policy and attitudinal barriers must be changed to move beyond the current situation. For example, in order to achieve the goal of healthy old growth in frequent-fire forests, the public must be educated regarding the evolutionary nature of these ecosystems and persuaded that collaborative action rather than preservation and litigation is the best course for the future of these forests. Land managers and policy makers must be encouraged to look beyond the single-species management paradigm toward managing natural processes, such as fire, so that ecosystems fall within the natural range of variability. They must also see that, given their recent evidence of catastrophic fires, management must take place outside the wildland–urban interface in order to protect old-growth forest attributes and human infrastructure. This means that, in some wilderness areas, management may be required. Land managers, researchers, and policy makers will also have to agree on a definition of old growth in frequent-fire landscapes; simply adopting a definition from the mesic Pacific Northwest will not work. Moreover, the culture within the federal agencies needs revamping to allow for more innovation, especially in terms of tree thinning and wildland fire use. Funding for comprehensive restoration treatments needs to be increased, and monitoring of the Healthy Forest Initiative and Healthy Forest Restoration Act must be undertaken. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Goshawk Unknown Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftjecolog
language English
topic diameter caps; federal employee liability; institutional barriers; Mexican spotted owl; northern goshawk; preservationist philosophy; public education; wildland fire use
spellingShingle diameter caps; federal employee liability; institutional barriers; Mexican spotted owl; northern goshawk; preservationist philosophy; public education; wildland fire use
Vosick, Diane
Ostergren, David M
Murfitt, Lucy
Old-growth Policy
topic_facet diameter caps; federal employee liability; institutional barriers; Mexican spotted owl; northern goshawk; preservationist philosophy; public education; wildland fire use
description Most federal legislation and policies (e.g., the Wilderness Act, Endangered Species Act, National Forest Management Act) fail to speak directly to the need for old-growth protection, recruitment, and restoration on federal lands. Various policy and attitudinal barriers must be changed to move beyond the current situation. For example, in order to achieve the goal of healthy old growth in frequent-fire forests, the public must be educated regarding the evolutionary nature of these ecosystems and persuaded that collaborative action rather than preservation and litigation is the best course for the future of these forests. Land managers and policy makers must be encouraged to look beyond the single-species management paradigm toward managing natural processes, such as fire, so that ecosystems fall within the natural range of variability. They must also see that, given their recent evidence of catastrophic fires, management must take place outside the wildland–urban interface in order to protect old-growth forest attributes and human infrastructure. This means that, in some wilderness areas, management may be required. Land managers, researchers, and policy makers will also have to agree on a definition of old growth in frequent-fire landscapes; simply adopting a definition from the mesic Pacific Northwest will not work. Moreover, the culture within the federal agencies needs revamping to allow for more innovation, especially in terms of tree thinning and wildland fire use. Funding for comprehensive restoration treatments needs to be increased, and monitoring of the Healthy Forest Initiative and Healthy Forest Restoration Act must be undertaken.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Vosick, Diane
Ostergren, David M
Murfitt, Lucy
author_facet Vosick, Diane
Ostergren, David M
Murfitt, Lucy
author_sort Vosick, Diane
title Old-growth Policy
title_short Old-growth Policy
title_full Old-growth Policy
title_fullStr Old-growth Policy
title_full_unstemmed Old-growth Policy
title_sort old-growth policy
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2007
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art19/
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Northern Goshawk
genre_facet Northern Goshawk
op_source Ecology and Society; Vol. 12, No. 2 (2007)
_version_ 1766145101046743040