FEATURES OF JUDICIAL GOVERNANCE: FOREIGN MODELS

• Published in: Актуальні проблеми політики
• Main Author: Пушкар, Сергій Іванович
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: Ukrainian
• Published: Національний університет «Одеська юридична академія», Громадська організація «Південно-український центр гендерних проблем» 2019
• Subjects: Norway; Northern Sweden
• Online Access: http://app.onua.edu.ua/index.php/app/article/view/10; https://doi.org/10.32837/app.v63i0.10

Practices of activity of bodies of judicial self-government of foreign countriesare analyzed. It is determined that the place and role of judicial self-governmentin the structure of the judiciary is determined by the national, historical traditionsof a particular country. It has been found that in most foreign countries, judicialself-government bodies act as independent bodies, both in relation to the legislatureand the executive, as well as to the judiciary.The scientific and theoretical study of typical models of judicial self-governmentfor the countries of Europe is carried out. The basic powers of the bodies of judicialself-government are highlighted.It is established that in most constitutions of European states, judicial selfgovernment bodies are designated as institutions of judicial self-government andare included in bodies that are not vested with judicial functions but are partof this branch of government.It is determined that in Western Europe there are two models of the organizationof the Judicial Councils: Northern (Sweden, Denmark, Norway) and Southern(French-Italian, Spanish-Portuguese). The peculiarity of the first model is thatthere is no single body designed to ensure the independence of the courts andthe independence of judges, the powers shared between the various bodies andinstitutions. The second is characterized by a liberal position in the system ofpublic authorities. The states of Central and Eastern Europe, in the creationof the Judicial Councils, modeled the Southern model of the model.It is substantiated that in order to further introduce positive experiencein the legislation of Ukraine, the experience of France is interesting, and among Актуальні проблеми політики. 2018. Вип. 62the countries of the post-socialist camp of Central and Eastern Europe – Poland,which is most actively carrying out the reform of the judiciary. Проведено аналіз практики діяльності органів суддівського самоврядування зарубіжних країн. Здійснено науково-теоретичне дослідження типовихмоделей суддівського самоврядування для країн Європи. Виділено основніповноваження органів суддівського самоврядування. Проведено аналіз практики діяльності органів суддівського самоврядування зарубіжних країн. Здійснено науково-теоретичне дослідження типовихмоделей суддівського самоврядування для країн Європи. Виділено основніповноваження органів суддівського самоврядування.