STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IDEOLOGY: FROM TSARIST EMPIRE TO SUSTAINABLE RUSSIA

The main approach to the relationship between mankind and the natural environment is sustainable development which has increasingly found its way into the context of environmental legislation. The efficacy and scope of Russian environmental legislation varied during different periods throughout the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BRICS Law Journal
Main Authors: ELENA GLADUN, OLGA ZAKHAROVA
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Publishing House V.Ема 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/119
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4-39-64
id ftjbricslj:oai:oai.bricslawjournal.elpub.ru:article/119
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection BRICS Law Journal
op_collection_id ftjbricslj
language English
topic sustainable development
Russian environmental legislation
spellingShingle sustainable development
Russian environmental legislation
ELENA GLADUN
OLGA ZAKHAROVA
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IDEOLOGY: FROM TSARIST EMPIRE TO SUSTAINABLE RUSSIA
topic_facet sustainable development
Russian environmental legislation
description The main approach to the relationship between mankind and the natural environment is sustainable development which has increasingly found its way into the context of environmental legislation. The efficacy and scope of Russian environmental legislation varied during different periods throughout the history of the country and depended to a great extent on the state ideology which at the time shaped public opinion and environmental awareness. Russian environmental ideology has proven to be inconsistent and contradictory, because it is based on a dual historical tradition: a pre-revolutionary and Soviet pattern. Environmental ideology in its historical perspective has always remained on the periphery of scholarly attention in Russia. This paper is an analysis of the basic domains of the state environmental ideology with the focus on changes that happened in the periods of the Great October Socialist Revolution and the 1990s when the country was transitioning to a new democratic state. The study of the historical peculiarities of the state environmental ideology can contribute to assessing how much Russia has progressed in achieving efficient legal regulation of environmental use and protection. The hypothesis is that the difficulties in the transition of the Russian Federation to sustainable development are caused by the failure of the state to form a holistic and efficient environmental ideology that can serve as an adequate background for the development and implementation of legal norms.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author ELENA GLADUN
OLGA ZAKHAROVA
author_facet ELENA GLADUN
OLGA ZAKHAROVA
author_sort ELENA GLADUN
title STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IDEOLOGY: FROM TSARIST EMPIRE TO SUSTAINABLE RUSSIA
title_short STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IDEOLOGY: FROM TSARIST EMPIRE TO SUSTAINABLE RUSSIA
title_full STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IDEOLOGY: FROM TSARIST EMPIRE TO SUSTAINABLE RUSSIA
title_fullStr STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IDEOLOGY: FROM TSARIST EMPIRE TO SUSTAINABLE RUSSIA
title_full_unstemmed STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IDEOLOGY: FROM TSARIST EMPIRE TO SUSTAINABLE RUSSIA
title_sort state environmental ideology: from tsarist empire to sustainable russia
publisher Publishing House V.Ема
publishDate 2017
url https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/119
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4-39-64
genre Yearbook of Polar Law
genre_facet Yearbook of Polar Law
op_source BRICS Law Journal; Vol 4, No 4 (2017); 39-64
Юридический журнал БРИКС; Vol 4, No 4 (2017); 39-64
2412-2343
2409-9058
10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4
op_relation https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/119/99
Bradshaw M.J. & Connolly R. Russia’s Natural Resources in the World Economy: History, Review and Reassessment, 57(6) Eurasian Geography and Economics 700 (2016).
Chattopadhyay K. The Rise and Fall of Environmentalism in the Early Soviet Union, Climate & Capitalism, 3 November 2014 (Nov. 20, 2017), available at http://climateandcapitalism.com/2014/11/03/rise-fall-environmentalism-early-soviet-union/.
Crotty J. & Hall S.M. Environmental Awareness and Sustainable Development in the Russian Federation, 22(5) Sustainable Development 311 (2014).
Dawson J.I. Eco-Nationalism: Anti-Nuclear Activism and National Identity in Russia, Lithuania, and Ukraine (Durham: Duke University Press, 1996).
De Lucia V. Competing Narratives and Complex Genealogies: The Ecosystem Approach in International Environmental Law, 27(1) Journal of Environmental Law 91 (2015).
Farmer A.M. & Farmer A.A. Developing Sustainability: Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations in Former Soviet Central Asia, 9(3) Sustainable Development 136 (2001).
Feshbach M. Ecological Disaster: Cleaning Up the Hidden Legacy of the Soviet Regime (New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1995).
Geography and Transition in the Post-Soviet Republics (M.J. Bradshaw (ed.), Chichester: Wiley, 1997).
Gladun E. & Chebotarev G. Legal Measures for Efficient Environmental Regulations of Oil and Gas Industry in Western Siberia, VII Yearbook of Polar Law 352 (2015).
Henry L.A. Red to Green: Environmental Activism in Post-Soviet Russia (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010).
Hooker J. Business Ethics as Rational Choice (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2011).
Howard E. The Garden Cities of Tomorrow (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902).
Howarth W. The Progression Towards Ecological Quality Standards, 18(1) Journal of Environmental Law 3 (2006).
Huffman S.K. & Rizov M. The Rise of Obesity in Transition Economies: Theory and Evidence from Russia, 46(3) Journal of Development Studies 1 (2010).
Kibert C.J. et al. The Ethics of Sustainability (Nov. 20, 2017), available at http://www.freetextbooklist.com/the-ethics-of-sustainability.
Newell J.P. & Henry L.A. The State of Environmental Protection in the Russian Federation: A Review of the Post-Soviet Era, 57(6) Eurasian Geography and Economics 779 (2016).
Oldfield J. Russian Nature: Exploring the Environmental Consequences of Societal Change (Burlington: Ashgate, 2005).
Oldfield J.D. & Shaw D.J.B. The Development of Russian Environmental Thought: Scientific and Geographical Perspectives on the Natural Environment (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016).
Ostergren D. & Jacques P. A Political Economy of Russian Nature Conservation Policy: Why Scientists Have Taken a Back Seat, 2(4) Global Environmental Politics 102 (2002).
Tynkkynen N. Prospects for Ecological Modernization in Russia: Analysis of the Policy Environment, 22(4) Demokratizatsiya 575 (2014).
Weidner H. & Jänicke M. Environmental Capacity Building in a Converging World in Capacity Building in National Environmental Policy: A Comparative Study of 17 Countries 409 (H. Weidner & M. Janicke (eds.), Berlin: Springer, 2002).
Weiner D.R. A Little Corner of Freedom (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999).
Williams C. Marxism and the Environment: An Excerpt from the New Ecology and Socialism International, International Socialist Review, July 2010 (Nov. 20, 2017), available at http://isreview.org/issue/72/marxism-and-environment.
Zakharchenko T.R. Environmental Policy in the Soviet Union, 14(1) Environmental Law and Policy Center 3 (1990).
Ziegler C.E. Environmental Policy in the USSR (Amherst, MA : University of Massachusetts Press, 1987).
https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/119
doi:10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4-39-64
op_rights Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Авторы, публикующие в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим:Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договорённости, касающиеся не-эксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).
op_doi https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4-39-6410.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4
container_title BRICS Law Journal
container_volume 4
container_issue 4
container_start_page 39
op_container_end_page 64
_version_ 1811646312875032576
spelling ftjbricslj:oai:oai.bricslawjournal.elpub.ru:article/119 2024-09-30T14:46:03+00:00 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IDEOLOGY: FROM TSARIST EMPIRE TO SUSTAINABLE RUSSIA ELENA GLADUN OLGA ZAKHAROVA 2017-12-12 application/pdf https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/119 https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4-39-64 eng eng Publishing House V.Ема https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/119/99 Bradshaw M.J. & Connolly R. Russia’s Natural Resources in the World Economy: History, Review and Reassessment, 57(6) Eurasian Geography and Economics 700 (2016). Chattopadhyay K. The Rise and Fall of Environmentalism in the Early Soviet Union, Climate & Capitalism, 3 November 2014 (Nov. 20, 2017), available at http://climateandcapitalism.com/2014/11/03/rise-fall-environmentalism-early-soviet-union/. Crotty J. & Hall S.M. Environmental Awareness and Sustainable Development in the Russian Federation, 22(5) Sustainable Development 311 (2014). Dawson J.I. Eco-Nationalism: Anti-Nuclear Activism and National Identity in Russia, Lithuania, and Ukraine (Durham: Duke University Press, 1996). De Lucia V. Competing Narratives and Complex Genealogies: The Ecosystem Approach in International Environmental Law, 27(1) Journal of Environmental Law 91 (2015). Farmer A.M. & Farmer A.A. Developing Sustainability: Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations in Former Soviet Central Asia, 9(3) Sustainable Development 136 (2001). Feshbach M. Ecological Disaster: Cleaning Up the Hidden Legacy of the Soviet Regime (New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1995). Geography and Transition in the Post-Soviet Republics (M.J. Bradshaw (ed.), Chichester: Wiley, 1997). Gladun E. & Chebotarev G. Legal Measures for Efficient Environmental Regulations of Oil and Gas Industry in Western Siberia, VII Yearbook of Polar Law 352 (2015). Henry L.A. Red to Green: Environmental Activism in Post-Soviet Russia (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010). Hooker J. Business Ethics as Rational Choice (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2011). Howard E. The Garden Cities of Tomorrow (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902). Howarth W. The Progression Towards Ecological Quality Standards, 18(1) Journal of Environmental Law 3 (2006). Huffman S.K. & Rizov M. The Rise of Obesity in Transition Economies: Theory and Evidence from Russia, 46(3) Journal of Development Studies 1 (2010). Kibert C.J. et al. The Ethics of Sustainability (Nov. 20, 2017), available at http://www.freetextbooklist.com/the-ethics-of-sustainability. Newell J.P. & Henry L.A. The State of Environmental Protection in the Russian Federation: A Review of the Post-Soviet Era, 57(6) Eurasian Geography and Economics 779 (2016). Oldfield J. Russian Nature: Exploring the Environmental Consequences of Societal Change (Burlington: Ashgate, 2005). Oldfield J.D. & Shaw D.J.B. The Development of Russian Environmental Thought: Scientific and Geographical Perspectives on the Natural Environment (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016). Ostergren D. & Jacques P. A Political Economy of Russian Nature Conservation Policy: Why Scientists Have Taken a Back Seat, 2(4) Global Environmental Politics 102 (2002). Tynkkynen N. Prospects for Ecological Modernization in Russia: Analysis of the Policy Environment, 22(4) Demokratizatsiya 575 (2014). Weidner H. & Jänicke M. Environmental Capacity Building in a Converging World in Capacity Building in National Environmental Policy: A Comparative Study of 17 Countries 409 (H. Weidner & M. Janicke (eds.), Berlin: Springer, 2002). Weiner D.R. A Little Corner of Freedom (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999). Williams C. Marxism and the Environment: An Excerpt from the New Ecology and Socialism International, International Socialist Review, July 2010 (Nov. 20, 2017), available at http://isreview.org/issue/72/marxism-and-environment. Zakharchenko T.R. Environmental Policy in the Soviet Union, 14(1) Environmental Law and Policy Center 3 (1990). Ziegler C.E. Environmental Policy in the USSR (Amherst, MA : University of Massachusetts Press, 1987). https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/119 doi:10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4-39-64 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). Авторы, публикующие в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим:Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договорённости, касающиеся не-эксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access). BRICS Law Journal; Vol 4, No 4 (2017); 39-64 Юридический журнал БРИКС; Vol 4, No 4 (2017); 39-64 2412-2343 2409-9058 10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4 sustainable development Russian environmental legislation info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2017 ftjbricslj https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4-39-6410.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-4 2024-09-03T03:00:50Z The main approach to the relationship between mankind and the natural environment is sustainable development which has increasingly found its way into the context of environmental legislation. The efficacy and scope of Russian environmental legislation varied during different periods throughout the history of the country and depended to a great extent on the state ideology which at the time shaped public opinion and environmental awareness. Russian environmental ideology has proven to be inconsistent and contradictory, because it is based on a dual historical tradition: a pre-revolutionary and Soviet pattern. Environmental ideology in its historical perspective has always remained on the periphery of scholarly attention in Russia. This paper is an analysis of the basic domains of the state environmental ideology with the focus on changes that happened in the periods of the Great October Socialist Revolution and the 1990s when the country was transitioning to a new democratic state. The study of the historical peculiarities of the state environmental ideology can contribute to assessing how much Russia has progressed in achieving efficient legal regulation of environmental use and protection. The hypothesis is that the difficulties in the transition of the Russian Federation to sustainable development are caused by the failure of the state to form a holistic and efficient environmental ideology that can serve as an adequate background for the development and implementation of legal norms. Article in Journal/Newspaper Yearbook of Polar Law BRICS Law Journal BRICS Law Journal 4 4 39 64