Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case

Sovereignty acquired by occupation entails “recognize[d] title based on discovery,” “a reasonable period [of] … effective occupation of the region claimed to be discovered” and “the continuous and peaceful display of State authority.” Only terra nullius is subject to occupation. A territory inhabite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Author: Ørebech, Peter Thomas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Law 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262
https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262
id ftjarlp:oai:nordicopenaccess.no:article/262
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjarlp:oai:nordicopenaccess.no:article/262 2023-05-15T14:18:43+02:00 Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case Ørebech, Peter Thomas 2016-05-23 application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip application/xml https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262 https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262 eng eng University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Law https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/810 https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/811 https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/812 https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/813 https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262 doi:10.17585/arctic.v7.262 Copyright (c) 2016 Arctic Review Arctic Review; Vol 7 No 1 (2016) 2387-4562 discovery occupation sovereignty Norse and Indigenous peoples Inuits Eastern Greenland Case – Permanent Court of International Justice 1933 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2016 ftjarlp https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262 2022-03-24T06:34:42Z Sovereignty acquired by occupation entails “recognize[d] title based on discovery,” “a reasonable period [of] … effective occupation of the region claimed to be discovered” and “the continuous and peaceful display of State authority.” Only terra nullius is subject to occupation. A territory inhabited by indigenous groups that sustain social and political organization may impede an occupying power because the terra nullius requirement fails. While sovereignty over thinly populated areas are often lax, case law requires less public involvement in these sparsely inhabited areas. This study reveals that the Dano-Norwegian Kings regarded the Inuit as “our subjects.” The Kings’ pretention of absolutum dominium and jurisdiction involved both the Norse and Inuit ethnic groups and “bygð ok ubygð” (settled and unsettled) land. The exodus of the Norse peoples in 1450 AD for 200 years did not undermine the acquired sovereignty of the Dano-Norwegian Crown, which as a result, spoiled the 1931 Norwegian pretentions to legally occupy East-Greenland. Denmark’s triumph in the 1933-East Greenland case resulted from a “zero-sum principle.” More than a 100 years earlier, the Danish Kingdom lost a succession of countries and dependencies. The 1814 Kiel Treaty transferred mainland Norway to Sweden, but explicitly states that none of the ancient Norwegian dependencies, Greenland, Iceland and Faroe Islands would follow suit. Thus, these territories remained part of the Kingdom of Denmark.(Published: May 2016)Citation: P. T. Ørebech. “Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case.” Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2016, pp. 20–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262 Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic East Greenland Faroe Islands Greenland Iceland inuit inuits Arctic Review on Law and Politics Arctic Faroe Islands Greenland Norway Arctic Review on Law and Politics 7 1
institution Open Polar
collection Arctic Review on Law and Politics
op_collection_id ftjarlp
language English
topic discovery
occupation
sovereignty
Norse and Indigenous peoples
Inuits
Eastern Greenland Case – Permanent Court of International Justice 1933
spellingShingle discovery
occupation
sovereignty
Norse and Indigenous peoples
Inuits
Eastern Greenland Case – Permanent Court of International Justice 1933
Ørebech, Peter Thomas
Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
topic_facet discovery
occupation
sovereignty
Norse and Indigenous peoples
Inuits
Eastern Greenland Case – Permanent Court of International Justice 1933
description Sovereignty acquired by occupation entails “recognize[d] title based on discovery,” “a reasonable period [of] … effective occupation of the region claimed to be discovered” and “the continuous and peaceful display of State authority.” Only terra nullius is subject to occupation. A territory inhabited by indigenous groups that sustain social and political organization may impede an occupying power because the terra nullius requirement fails. While sovereignty over thinly populated areas are often lax, case law requires less public involvement in these sparsely inhabited areas. This study reveals that the Dano-Norwegian Kings regarded the Inuit as “our subjects.” The Kings’ pretention of absolutum dominium and jurisdiction involved both the Norse and Inuit ethnic groups and “bygð ok ubygð” (settled and unsettled) land. The exodus of the Norse peoples in 1450 AD for 200 years did not undermine the acquired sovereignty of the Dano-Norwegian Crown, which as a result, spoiled the 1931 Norwegian pretentions to legally occupy East-Greenland. Denmark’s triumph in the 1933-East Greenland case resulted from a “zero-sum principle.” More than a 100 years earlier, the Danish Kingdom lost a succession of countries and dependencies. The 1814 Kiel Treaty transferred mainland Norway to Sweden, but explicitly states that none of the ancient Norwegian dependencies, Greenland, Iceland and Faroe Islands would follow suit. Thus, these territories remained part of the Kingdom of Denmark.(Published: May 2016)Citation: P. T. Ørebech. “Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case.” Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2016, pp. 20–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ørebech, Peter Thomas
author_facet Ørebech, Peter Thomas
author_sort Ørebech, Peter Thomas
title Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_short Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_full Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_fullStr Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_full_unstemmed Terra nullius, Inuit Habitation and Norse Occupation – With Special Emphasis on the 1933 East Greenland Case
title_sort terra nullius, inuit habitation and norse occupation – with special emphasis on the 1933 east greenland case
publisher University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Law
publishDate 2016
url https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262
https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262
geographic Arctic
Faroe Islands
Greenland
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Faroe Islands
Greenland
Norway
genre Arctic
Arctic
East Greenland
Faroe Islands
Greenland
Iceland
inuit
inuits
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
East Greenland
Faroe Islands
Greenland
Iceland
inuit
inuits
op_source Arctic Review; Vol 7 No 1 (2016)
2387-4562
op_relation https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/810
https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/811
https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/812
https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262/813
https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/262
doi:10.17585/arctic.v7.262
op_rights Copyright (c) 2016 Arctic Review
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17585/arctic.v7.262
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 7
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766290197343895552