Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps

In Canada, comprehensive land claims agreements – often called modern treaties – between the government and Indigenous nations include provisions prescribing how disputes between treaty parties are to be resolved. Experiences with these dispute resolution mechanisms vary across treaty contexts and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Author: Wright, David
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Law 2020
Subjects:
ADR
Online Access:https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519
https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519
id ftjarlp:oai:nordicopenaccess.no:article/2519
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjarlp:oai:nordicopenaccess.no:article/2519 2023-05-15T14:18:43+02:00 Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps Wright, David 2020-12-09 application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip text/xml https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519 https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519 eng eng University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Law https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4798 https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4830 https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4831 https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4832 https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519 doi:10.23865/arctic.v11.2519 Copyright (c) 2020 David Wright http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 CC-BY-NC Arctic Review; Vol 11 (2020); 280-309 2387-4562 dispute resolution conflict resolution ADR modern treaties Indigenous law land claim agreements info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2020 ftjarlp https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519 2022-03-24T06:35:03Z In Canada, comprehensive land claims agreements – often called modern treaties – between the government and Indigenous nations include provisions prescribing how disputes between treaty parties are to be resolved. Experiences with these dispute resolution mechanisms vary across treaty contexts and there is substantial variance in the terms of these treaties. To date, this dimension of modern treaty implementation has received minimal scholarly attention, despite calls for such research. Drawing on specific examples, this article sets a foundation for further research by examining the significant variation across different treaties’ dispute resolution mechanisms and commenting on key differences, similarities and other notable features. A key focus of the analysis is on the observable evolution of these mechanisms from a relatively narrow arbitration board model to a more flexible “staged approach”. The analysis suggests that the latter may provide a stronger basis for joint problem-solving and integrative bargaining, notwithstanding open questions about the extent to which such approaches are warranted in fraught Crown-Indigenous relationships in Canada. The article also discusses the conspicuous absence of dispute resolution mechanisms that accommodate, let alone require, approaches rooted in the traditional or cultural practices of Indigenous treaty parties. Observations throughout are contextualized in relation to a growing body of jurisprudence and a broader context of fast-changing federal law and policy in Canada, which may set the stage for amendments to the dispute resolution provisions of modern treaties. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Review on Law and Politics Canada Arctic Review on Law and Politics 11 0 280
institution Open Polar
collection Arctic Review on Law and Politics
op_collection_id ftjarlp
language English
topic dispute resolution
conflict resolution
ADR
modern treaties
Indigenous law
land claim agreements
spellingShingle dispute resolution
conflict resolution
ADR
modern treaties
Indigenous law
land claim agreements
Wright, David
Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
topic_facet dispute resolution
conflict resolution
ADR
modern treaties
Indigenous law
land claim agreements
description In Canada, comprehensive land claims agreements – often called modern treaties – between the government and Indigenous nations include provisions prescribing how disputes between treaty parties are to be resolved. Experiences with these dispute resolution mechanisms vary across treaty contexts and there is substantial variance in the terms of these treaties. To date, this dimension of modern treaty implementation has received minimal scholarly attention, despite calls for such research. Drawing on specific examples, this article sets a foundation for further research by examining the significant variation across different treaties’ dispute resolution mechanisms and commenting on key differences, similarities and other notable features. A key focus of the analysis is on the observable evolution of these mechanisms from a relatively narrow arbitration board model to a more flexible “staged approach”. The analysis suggests that the latter may provide a stronger basis for joint problem-solving and integrative bargaining, notwithstanding open questions about the extent to which such approaches are warranted in fraught Crown-Indigenous relationships in Canada. The article also discusses the conspicuous absence of dispute resolution mechanisms that accommodate, let alone require, approaches rooted in the traditional or cultural practices of Indigenous treaty parties. Observations throughout are contextualized in relation to a growing body of jurisprudence and a broader context of fast-changing federal law and policy in Canada, which may set the stage for amendments to the dispute resolution provisions of modern treaties.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wright, David
author_facet Wright, David
author_sort Wright, David
title Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_short Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_full Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_fullStr Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_full_unstemmed Dispute Resolution in Modern Treaties: Evolutions, Observations and Next Steps
title_sort dispute resolution in modern treaties: evolutions, observations and next steps
publisher University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Law
publishDate 2020
url https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519
https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Arctic Review; Vol 11 (2020); 280-309
2387-4562
op_relation https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4798
https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4830
https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4831
https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519/4832
https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2519
doi:10.23865/arctic.v11.2519
op_rights Copyright (c) 2020 David Wright
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC
op_doi https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v11.2519
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 11
container_issue 0
container_start_page 280
_version_ 1766290209605943296