ETHNOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SIBERIAN ZOOMORPHS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC EVIDENCE

Ethnological analogies derived from studies of recent environments and societies in Arctic and Subarctic regions of Siberia are generally being applied in archaeological interpretative models. The analogies prove to be inspiring, because each of them has the potential to enlarge the scope of static...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Sázelová, С. Сазелова
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Russian
Published: IAET SB RAS 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.archaeology.nsc.ru/jour/article/view/133
id ftjarchaeology:oai:oai.nsc.elpub.ru:article/133
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia
op_collection_id ftjarchaeology
language Russian
topic зооморфные фигурки
mythology
paleoethnology
Siberia
Upper Paleolithic art
zoomorphic figurine
мифология
палеоэтнология
Сибирь
верхнепалеолитическое искусство
spellingShingle зооморфные фигурки
mythology
paleoethnology
Siberia
Upper Paleolithic art
zoomorphic figurine
мифология
палеоэтнология
Сибирь
верхнепалеолитическое искусство
S. Sázelová
С. Сазелова
ETHNOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SIBERIAN ZOOMORPHS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC EVIDENCE
topic_facet зооморфные фигурки
mythology
paleoethnology
Siberia
Upper Paleolithic art
zoomorphic figurine
мифология
палеоэтнология
Сибирь
верхнепалеолитическое искусство
description Ethnological analogies derived from studies of recent environments and societies in Arctic and Subarctic regions of Siberia are generally being applied in archaeological interpretative models. The analogies prove to be inspiring, because each of them has the potential to enlarge the scope of static archaeological evidence by including dynamic aspects of social and symbolic systems within recent societies. Here, we analyze electronic databases and literature on zoomorphic and theriantropic figurines collected during the Jesup North Pacific expedition. Subsequently, the social value and mythological context that accompany specific zoomorphic themes were recorded. Some aspects of these paleoethnological implications are partially applicable to the Upper Paleolithic zoomorphs. В археологических интерпретационных моделях нередко используются параллели, относящиеся к близким к современности группам, обитающим в арктических и субарктических регионах Сибири. Эти параллели весьма важны для понимания археологических материалов, статичных по своей природе, поскольку позволяют учесть динамику социальных и символических систем близких к современности сообществ. В статье анализируются электронные базы данных, а также научная литература по зооморфным и териантропным фигуркам, собранным в ходе Джесуповской Северо-Тихоокеанской экспедиции. Обсуждаются возможный смысл и мифологический контекст зооморфных изображений. Некоторые аспекты палеоэтнологических данных частично применимы к зооморфной скульптуре верхнего палеолита.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author S. Sázelová
С. Сазелова
author_facet S. Sázelová
С. Сазелова
author_sort S. Sázelová
title ETHNOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SIBERIAN ZOOMORPHS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC EVIDENCE
title_short ETHNOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SIBERIAN ZOOMORPHS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC EVIDENCE
title_full ETHNOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SIBERIAN ZOOMORPHS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC EVIDENCE
title_fullStr ETHNOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SIBERIAN ZOOMORPHS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC EVIDENCE
title_full_unstemmed ETHNOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SIBERIAN ZOOMORPHS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC EVIDENCE
title_sort ethnological approach to siberian zoomorphs: a search for meaning and implications for the upper paleolithic evidence
publisher IAET SB RAS
publishDate 2016
url https://journal.archaeology.nsc.ru/jour/article/view/133
genre Arctic
Arctic Anthropology
Subarctic
Siberia
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Anthropology
Subarctic
Siberia
op_source Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia; Vol 60, No 4 (2014); 125-135
Археология, этнография и антропология Евразии; Vol 60, No 4 (2014); 125-135
1563-0110
op_relation https://journal.archaeology.nsc.ru/jour/article/view/133/134
Амирханов Х.А., Ахметгалеева Н.Б., Бужилова А.П., Бурова Н.Д., Лев С.Ю., Мащенко Е.Н. Исследования палеолита в Зарайске, 1999–2005. – М.: Палеограф, 2009. – 466 с.
Арефьева А.А. Нгухуко и Акань // История Ямала: взгляд из музейных хранилищ. – Екатеринбург: Урал. рабочий, 2008. – Вып. 1. – С. 51–57.
Вдовин И.С. Природа и человек в религиозных представлениях чукчей // Природа и человек в религиозныхпредставлениях народов Сибири и Севера (вторая половина XIX – начало XX в.). – Л.: Наука, 1976. – С. 217–253.
Герасимов М.М. Мальта: Палеолитическая стоянка: Результат работ 1928–1929 гг . – Иркутск: Иркут. краевой музей, 1931. – 34 с.
Гурвич И.С. Корякские промысловые праздники // Сибирский этнографический сборник. – М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1962. – Вып. 4. – С. 238–257.
Ефименко П.П. Костенки I. – М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1958. – 450, [2] с.
Иванов С.Б. Мамонт в искусстве народов Сибири // Сб. МАЭ. – 1949. – Вып. 11. – С. 132–154.
Потапова М.Г., Левина А.П. Народы Сибири. – М.: Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1956. – 1114 с.
Таксами Ч.М. Представления о природе и человеке у нивхов // Природа и человек в религиозных представлениях народов Сибири и Севера (вторая половина XIX – начало XX в.). – Л.: Наука, 1976. – С. 203–216.
Abramova Z.A. L’art paléolithique d´Europe orientale et de Sibérie. – Grenoble: Jérome Millon, 1995. – 367 p.: ill., maps.
Absolon K. Výzkum diluviální stanice lovců mamutů v Dolních Věstonicích na Pavlovských kopcích na Moravě: (Pracovní zpráva za první rok 1924). – Brno: Barvič a Novotný, 1938. – 46 str.; 7 tab.
Absolon K. Výzkum diluviální stanice lovců mamutů v Dolních Věstonicích na Pavlovských kopcích na Moravě: (Pracovní zpráva za třetí rok 1926). – Brno: Moravské knihtiskárny polygrafi e, 1945. – 241 str.; 18 tab.
Assmann A. Transformations between history and memory // Social Research. – 2008. – Vol. 75. N 1. – P. 49–72.
Banerjee S., Kazlowski S., Rose H., Hoshino M., Morris A. Arctic wings: Birds of the arctic national wildlife refuge. – Seattle: Mountaineers books, 2006. – 192 p.
Binford R.A. Archaeology as anthropology // American Antiquity. – 1962. – Vol. 28. – P. 217–225.
Bird-David N. The giving environment: Another perspective on the economic system of gatherer-hunters // Current Anthropology. – 1990. – Vol. 31. – P. 189–196.
Blix A.S. Arctic animals and their adaptations to life on the edge. – Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press, 2005. – 296 p.
Boas F. Jesup North Pacifi c Expedition // The American Museum J. – 1903. – Vol. 5. – P. 69–117.
Bogoras W. The Chukchee. – Leiden; N.Y.: E.J. Brill Ltd, 1907. – 260 p. – (The Jesup North Pacific Expedition Publicatiòns; vol. 7, pt. 2). – (Memoir of the American Museum of Natural History; vol. 11).
Bogoras W. Chukchee mythology. – Leiden, N.Y.: E.J. Brill Ltd, 1910. – 197 p. – (The Jesup North Pacifi c Expedition Publicatiòns; vol. 8, pt. I). – (Memoir of the American Museum of Natural History; vol. 12).
Borić D. Images of animality: Hybrid bodies and mimesis in early Prehistoric art // Image and imagination / eds. C. Renfrew, I. Morley. – Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007. – P. 83–99.
Connerton P. How societies remember. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. – 121 p.
Czaplicka M.A. Aboriginal Siberia: A study in social anthropology. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914. – 436 p.
David N., Kramer C. Ethnoarchaeology in action. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. – XXVII, 476 p.
Davidson I. Power of pictures // Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol / eds. M.W. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratman, N. Jablonski. – Berkley: University of California Press, 1997. – P. 125–159.
Delporte H. L´image des animaux dans l´art préhistorique. – P.: Picard, 1990. – 254 p.
Der Löwenmensch: Tier und Mensch in der Kunst der Eiszeit / Hrsg. K. Wehrenberger, B. Reinhardt. – Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag, 1994. – 141 S.
Djindjian F. L’art paléolithique dans son systeme culturel. II: De la variabilité des bestiaires représentés dans l’art pariétal et mobilier paléolithique // La spiritualité: Actes du Colloque international de Liège (10–12 décembre 2003) / ed. by M. Otte. – Liége: Université de Liége, 2004. – P. 127–152. – (ERAUL; N 106).
Dupuy D. Fragments d’images, images de fragments: La statuaire gravettienne, du geste au symbole: thèse de doctorat Nouveau Régime / Université de Provence, Aix-Marseille I. – Marseille, 2007. – 321 p.
Gamble C.S. Interaction and alliance in Palaeolithic society // Man. N. S. – 1982. – Vol. 17. – P. 92–107.
Guthrie R.D. The nature of Paleolithic art. – Chicago; L.: University of Chicago Press, 2005. – 520 p.
Gvozdover M. Art of the Mammoth hunters: The fi nds from Avdeevo. – Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1995. – 186 p. – (Oxbow monographs; N 49).
Hahn J. Kraft und Aggresion: die Botschaft der Eiszeitkunst im Aurignacien Süddeutschlands? – Tübingen: Institut für Urgesichte der Universität Tübingen, 1986. – 254 S. – (Archaeologica Venatoria; Bd. 7).
Hunters of the golden age / eds. W. Roebroeks, M. Mussi, J. Svoboda, K. Fennema. – Leiden: University of Leiden, 2000. – 420 p.
Ingold T. From trust to domination: An alternative history of human-animal relations // Animals and human society / ed. by S. Manning. – L.: Routledge, 1994. – P. 1–22.
Jochelson W. The Koryaks. – Leiden; N.Y.: E.J. Brill Ltd, 1908. – 460 p. – (The Jesup North Pacific Expedition Publicatiòns; vol. 6, pt. 2). – (Memoir of the American Museum of Natural History; vol. 10).
Jochelson W. The Yukaghir and Yukaghirized Tungus. – Leiden; N.Y.: E.J. Brill Ltd, 1926. – 127 p. – (The Jesup North Pacific Expedition Publicatiòns; vol. 9). – (Memoir of the American Museum of Vatural History; vol. 13).
Klíma B. Les représentations animales du Paléolithique supérieur de Dolní Věstonice: 3e Colloque de la Société Suisse des Sciences Humaine. – Fribourg, 1979. – P. 323–332.
Klíma B. Figürlichen Plastiken aus der paläolitischen Siedlung von Pavlov (ČSSR) // Religion und Kult. – 1989. – Bd. 6. – S. 81–90.
Králík M. Ancient ceramics and imprints on their surfaces // Pavlov – Excavations 2007–2011 / ed by J. Svoboda. – Brno: Institute of Archaeology at Brno, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 2011. – P. 207–244. – (Dolní Věstonice studies; N 18).
Krupnik I. Arctic adaptations: Native whalers and reindeer herders of Northern Eurasia. – Hanover; L.: University Press of New England, 1993. – 355 p.
Laufer B. Preliminary notes on explorations among Amoor tribes // American Anthropologist. – 1900. – Vol. 2, N 2. – P. 297–338.
Lewis-Williams D.J. The mind in the cave: Conciousness and the origins of art. – N.Y.: Thames & Hudson, 2002. – 320 p.
Lewis-Williams D.J., Dowson T.R. The signs of all times: Entoptic phenomena in Upper Paleolitic art // Current Anthropology. – 1988. – Vol. 29, N 2. – P. 201–245.
Marshack A. The roots of civilization: the cognitive beginnings of mans fi rst art, symbol and notation. – N.Y.: Moyer Bell Ltd; Mount Kisco, 1991. – 445 p.
Mithen S. Ecological interpretations of Paleolithic art // Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. – 1991. – Vol. 57, N 1. – P. 103–114.
Mitlyanskaya T. Native carvers and outsider artists: Patterns of interaction in Siberia Eskimo/Chukchi ivory carving // Arctic Anthropology. – 1996. – Vol. 33, N 1. – P. 67–88.
Mortillet G., de. Le Préhistorique: antiquité de l’hom me. – P.: C. Reinwald, 1883. – 642 p. – (Bibliottèque des Sciences contemporaines).
Nadasdy P. The gift in the animal: The ontology of hunting and human-animal society // American Ethnologist. – 2007. – Vol. 34. – P. 25–43.
op_rights Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
_version_ 1810294064928522240
spelling ftjarchaeology:oai:oai.nsc.elpub.ru:article/133 2024-09-15T17:52:00+00:00 ETHNOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SIBERIAN ZOOMORPHS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UPPER PALEOLITHIC EVIDENCE ЭТНОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ПОДХОД К СИБИРСКОЙ ЗООМОРФНОЙ СКУЛЬПТУРЕ: В ПОИСКАХ СМЫСЛОВОГО СОДЕРЖАНИЯ ВЕРХНЕПАЛЕОЛИТИЧЕСКИХ ИЗОБРАЖЕНИЙ S. Sázelová С. Сазелова 2016-03-26 application/pdf https://journal.archaeology.nsc.ru/jour/article/view/133 rus rus IAET SB RAS https://journal.archaeology.nsc.ru/jour/article/view/133/134 Амирханов Х.А., Ахметгалеева Н.Б., Бужилова А.П., Бурова Н.Д., Лев С.Ю., Мащенко Е.Н. Исследования палеолита в Зарайске, 1999–2005. – М.: Палеограф, 2009. – 466 с. Арефьева А.А. Нгухуко и Акань // История Ямала: взгляд из музейных хранилищ. – Екатеринбург: Урал. рабочий, 2008. – Вып. 1. – С. 51–57. Вдовин И.С. Природа и человек в религиозных представлениях чукчей // Природа и человек в религиозныхпредставлениях народов Сибири и Севера (вторая половина XIX – начало XX в.). – Л.: Наука, 1976. – С. 217–253. Герасимов М.М. Мальта: Палеолитическая стоянка: Результат работ 1928–1929 гг . – Иркутск: Иркут. краевой музей, 1931. – 34 с. Гурвич И.С. Корякские промысловые праздники // Сибирский этнографический сборник. – М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1962. – Вып. 4. – С. 238–257. Ефименко П.П. Костенки I. – М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1958. – 450, [2] с. Иванов С.Б. Мамонт в искусстве народов Сибири // Сб. МАЭ. – 1949. – Вып. 11. – С. 132–154. Потапова М.Г., Левина А.П. Народы Сибири. – М.: Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1956. – 1114 с. Таксами Ч.М. Представления о природе и человеке у нивхов // Природа и человек в религиозных представлениях народов Сибири и Севера (вторая половина XIX – начало XX в.). – Л.: Наука, 1976. – С. 203–216. Abramova Z.A. L’art paléolithique d´Europe orientale et de Sibérie. – Grenoble: Jérome Millon, 1995. – 367 p.: ill., maps. Absolon K. Výzkum diluviální stanice lovců mamutů v Dolních Věstonicích na Pavlovských kopcích na Moravě: (Pracovní zpráva za první rok 1924). – Brno: Barvič a Novotný, 1938. – 46 str.; 7 tab. Absolon K. Výzkum diluviální stanice lovců mamutů v Dolních Věstonicích na Pavlovských kopcích na Moravě: (Pracovní zpráva za třetí rok 1926). – Brno: Moravské knihtiskárny polygrafi e, 1945. – 241 str.; 18 tab. Assmann A. Transformations between history and memory // Social Research. – 2008. – Vol. 75. N 1. – P. 49–72. Banerjee S., Kazlowski S., Rose H., Hoshino M., Morris A. Arctic wings: Birds of the arctic national wildlife refuge. – Seattle: Mountaineers books, 2006. – 192 p. Binford R.A. Archaeology as anthropology // American Antiquity. – 1962. – Vol. 28. – P. 217–225. Bird-David N. The giving environment: Another perspective on the economic system of gatherer-hunters // Current Anthropology. – 1990. – Vol. 31. – P. 189–196. Blix A.S. Arctic animals and their adaptations to life on the edge. – Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press, 2005. – 296 p. Boas F. Jesup North Pacifi c Expedition // The American Museum J. – 1903. – Vol. 5. – P. 69–117. Bogoras W. The Chukchee. – Leiden; N.Y.: E.J. Brill Ltd, 1907. – 260 p. – (The Jesup North Pacific Expedition Publicatiòns; vol. 7, pt. 2). – (Memoir of the American Museum of Natural History; vol. 11). Bogoras W. Chukchee mythology. – Leiden, N.Y.: E.J. Brill Ltd, 1910. – 197 p. – (The Jesup North Pacifi c Expedition Publicatiòns; vol. 8, pt. I). – (Memoir of the American Museum of Natural History; vol. 12). Borić D. Images of animality: Hybrid bodies and mimesis in early Prehistoric art // Image and imagination / eds. C. Renfrew, I. Morley. – Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007. – P. 83–99. Connerton P. How societies remember. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. – 121 p. Czaplicka M.A. Aboriginal Siberia: A study in social anthropology. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1914. – 436 p. David N., Kramer C. Ethnoarchaeology in action. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. – XXVII, 476 p. Davidson I. Power of pictures // Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol / eds. M.W. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratman, N. Jablonski. – Berkley: University of California Press, 1997. – P. 125–159. Delporte H. L´image des animaux dans l´art préhistorique. – P.: Picard, 1990. – 254 p. Der Löwenmensch: Tier und Mensch in der Kunst der Eiszeit / Hrsg. K. Wehrenberger, B. Reinhardt. – Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag, 1994. – 141 S. Djindjian F. L’art paléolithique dans son systeme culturel. II: De la variabilité des bestiaires représentés dans l’art pariétal et mobilier paléolithique // La spiritualité: Actes du Colloque international de Liège (10–12 décembre 2003) / ed. by M. Otte. – Liége: Université de Liége, 2004. – P. 127–152. – (ERAUL; N 106). Dupuy D. Fragments d’images, images de fragments: La statuaire gravettienne, du geste au symbole: thèse de doctorat Nouveau Régime / Université de Provence, Aix-Marseille I. – Marseille, 2007. – 321 p. Gamble C.S. Interaction and alliance in Palaeolithic society // Man. N. S. – 1982. – Vol. 17. – P. 92–107. Guthrie R.D. The nature of Paleolithic art. – Chicago; L.: University of Chicago Press, 2005. – 520 p. Gvozdover M. Art of the Mammoth hunters: The fi nds from Avdeevo. – Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1995. – 186 p. – (Oxbow monographs; N 49). Hahn J. Kraft und Aggresion: die Botschaft der Eiszeitkunst im Aurignacien Süddeutschlands? – Tübingen: Institut für Urgesichte der Universität Tübingen, 1986. – 254 S. – (Archaeologica Venatoria; Bd. 7). Hunters of the golden age / eds. W. Roebroeks, M. Mussi, J. Svoboda, K. Fennema. – Leiden: University of Leiden, 2000. – 420 p. Ingold T. From trust to domination: An alternative history of human-animal relations // Animals and human society / ed. by S. Manning. – L.: Routledge, 1994. – P. 1–22. Jochelson W. The Koryaks. – Leiden; N.Y.: E.J. Brill Ltd, 1908. – 460 p. – (The Jesup North Pacific Expedition Publicatiòns; vol. 6, pt. 2). – (Memoir of the American Museum of Natural History; vol. 10). Jochelson W. The Yukaghir and Yukaghirized Tungus. – Leiden; N.Y.: E.J. Brill Ltd, 1926. – 127 p. – (The Jesup North Pacific Expedition Publicatiòns; vol. 9). – (Memoir of the American Museum of Vatural History; vol. 13). Klíma B. Les représentations animales du Paléolithique supérieur de Dolní Věstonice: 3e Colloque de la Société Suisse des Sciences Humaine. – Fribourg, 1979. – P. 323–332. Klíma B. Figürlichen Plastiken aus der paläolitischen Siedlung von Pavlov (ČSSR) // Religion und Kult. – 1989. – Bd. 6. – S. 81–90. Králík M. Ancient ceramics and imprints on their surfaces // Pavlov – Excavations 2007–2011 / ed by J. Svoboda. – Brno: Institute of Archaeology at Brno, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 2011. – P. 207–244. – (Dolní Věstonice studies; N 18). Krupnik I. Arctic adaptations: Native whalers and reindeer herders of Northern Eurasia. – Hanover; L.: University Press of New England, 1993. – 355 p. Laufer B. Preliminary notes on explorations among Amoor tribes // American Anthropologist. – 1900. – Vol. 2, N 2. – P. 297–338. Lewis-Williams D.J. The mind in the cave: Conciousness and the origins of art. – N.Y.: Thames & Hudson, 2002. – 320 p. Lewis-Williams D.J., Dowson T.R. The signs of all times: Entoptic phenomena in Upper Paleolitic art // Current Anthropology. – 1988. – Vol. 29, N 2. – P. 201–245. Marshack A. The roots of civilization: the cognitive beginnings of mans fi rst art, symbol and notation. – N.Y.: Moyer Bell Ltd; Mount Kisco, 1991. – 445 p. Mithen S. Ecological interpretations of Paleolithic art // Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. – 1991. – Vol. 57, N 1. – P. 103–114. Mitlyanskaya T. Native carvers and outsider artists: Patterns of interaction in Siberia Eskimo/Chukchi ivory carving // Arctic Anthropology. – 1996. – Vol. 33, N 1. – P. 67–88. Mortillet G., de. Le Préhistorique: antiquité de l’hom me. – P.: C. Reinwald, 1883. – 642 p. – (Bibliottèque des Sciences contemporaines). Nadasdy P. The gift in the animal: The ontology of hunting and human-animal society // American Ethnologist. – 2007. – Vol. 34. – P. 25–43. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia; Vol 60, No 4 (2014); 125-135 Археология, этнография и антропология Евразии; Vol 60, No 4 (2014); 125-135 1563-0110 зооморфные фигурки mythology paleoethnology Siberia Upper Paleolithic art zoomorphic figurine мифология палеоэтнология Сибирь верхнепалеолитическое искусство info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2016 ftjarchaeology 2024-07-11T03:04:13Z Ethnological analogies derived from studies of recent environments and societies in Arctic and Subarctic regions of Siberia are generally being applied in archaeological interpretative models. The analogies prove to be inspiring, because each of them has the potential to enlarge the scope of static archaeological evidence by including dynamic aspects of social and symbolic systems within recent societies. Here, we analyze electronic databases and literature on zoomorphic and theriantropic figurines collected during the Jesup North Pacific expedition. Subsequently, the social value and mythological context that accompany specific zoomorphic themes were recorded. Some aspects of these paleoethnological implications are partially applicable to the Upper Paleolithic zoomorphs. В археологических интерпретационных моделях нередко используются параллели, относящиеся к близким к современности группам, обитающим в арктических и субарктических регионах Сибири. Эти параллели весьма важны для понимания археологических материалов, статичных по своей природе, поскольку позволяют учесть динамику социальных и символических систем близких к современности сообществ. В статье анализируются электронные базы данных, а также научная литература по зооморфным и териантропным фигуркам, собранным в ходе Джесуповской Северо-Тихоокеанской экспедиции. Обсуждаются возможный смысл и мифологический контекст зооморфных изображений. Некоторые аспекты палеоэтнологических данных частично применимы к зооморфной скульптуре верхнего палеолита. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Anthropology Subarctic Siberia Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia