POTVIN DOUBLE-COUNT AERIAL SURVEYS IN NEW BRUNSWICK: ARE RESULTS RELIABLE FOR MOOSE?

Following the rapid decline of deer (Odocoileus virginianus) across northern New Brunswick in the late 1980s, the New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources began to utilize a double-count helicopter survey to estimate deer numbers. Although the survey was designed for deer, moose (Alces alces) s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cumberland, Roderick E
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Lakehead University 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/98
id ftjalces:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/98
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjalces:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/98 2024-06-16T07:33:08+00:00 POTVIN DOUBLE-COUNT AERIAL SURVEYS IN NEW BRUNSWICK: ARE RESULTS RELIABLE FOR MOOSE? Cumberland, Roderick E 2012-06-22 application/pdf http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/98 eng eng Lakehead University http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/98/137 http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/98 Alces: A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose; Vol. 48 (2012); 67-77 2293-6629 0835-5851 Aerial survey Alces alces deer density estimate moose New Brunswick info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2012 ftjalces 2024-05-22T03:01:08Z Following the rapid decline of deer (Odocoileus virginianus) across northern New Brunswick in the late 1980s, the New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources began to utilize a double-count helicopter survey to estimate deer numbers. Although the survey was designed for deer, moose (Alces alces) sightings were also recorded; however, no analysis was conducted on the accuracy or usefulness of these data to estimate moose numbers. The survey design was a modification of the Potvin double-count survey method for deer which accounts for most caveats to aerial surveys. This double-count (mark-recapture) technique allows calculation of bias for both observers, for single and groups of moose, and individual flights. Moose population estimates calculated from 79 flights ranged from 0.17-3.49 moose/km2 and were similar to a variety of estimates throughout North America. Population estimates from 2004-2009 correlated well with corresponding 2009 population indices for moose based on number of moose seen by deer hunters (Corr. = 0.725, P <0.001). The Potvin estimates in Wildlife Management Zone 2 were highly correlated (0.82-0.93, P <0.05) with other indices based on road kill moose, moose sightings, and harvest success rates; moose sightings and hunter success were also correlated in several other zones. This analysis indicates that Potvin surveys produce reliable population density estimates of moose in boreal/Acadian forests, given that the sighting probability is >0.4 and flights occur before mid-February when moose may occupy denser canopy cover. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Alces (A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose)
institution Open Polar
collection Alces (A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose)
op_collection_id ftjalces
language English
topic Aerial survey
Alces alces
deer
density estimate
moose
New Brunswick
spellingShingle Aerial survey
Alces alces
deer
density estimate
moose
New Brunswick
Cumberland, Roderick E
POTVIN DOUBLE-COUNT AERIAL SURVEYS IN NEW BRUNSWICK: ARE RESULTS RELIABLE FOR MOOSE?
topic_facet Aerial survey
Alces alces
deer
density estimate
moose
New Brunswick
description Following the rapid decline of deer (Odocoileus virginianus) across northern New Brunswick in the late 1980s, the New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources began to utilize a double-count helicopter survey to estimate deer numbers. Although the survey was designed for deer, moose (Alces alces) sightings were also recorded; however, no analysis was conducted on the accuracy or usefulness of these data to estimate moose numbers. The survey design was a modification of the Potvin double-count survey method for deer which accounts for most caveats to aerial surveys. This double-count (mark-recapture) technique allows calculation of bias for both observers, for single and groups of moose, and individual flights. Moose population estimates calculated from 79 flights ranged from 0.17-3.49 moose/km2 and were similar to a variety of estimates throughout North America. Population estimates from 2004-2009 correlated well with corresponding 2009 population indices for moose based on number of moose seen by deer hunters (Corr. = 0.725, P <0.001). The Potvin estimates in Wildlife Management Zone 2 were highly correlated (0.82-0.93, P <0.05) with other indices based on road kill moose, moose sightings, and harvest success rates; moose sightings and hunter success were also correlated in several other zones. This analysis indicates that Potvin surveys produce reliable population density estimates of moose in boreal/Acadian forests, given that the sighting probability is >0.4 and flights occur before mid-February when moose may occupy denser canopy cover.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cumberland, Roderick E
author_facet Cumberland, Roderick E
author_sort Cumberland, Roderick E
title POTVIN DOUBLE-COUNT AERIAL SURVEYS IN NEW BRUNSWICK: ARE RESULTS RELIABLE FOR MOOSE?
title_short POTVIN DOUBLE-COUNT AERIAL SURVEYS IN NEW BRUNSWICK: ARE RESULTS RELIABLE FOR MOOSE?
title_full POTVIN DOUBLE-COUNT AERIAL SURVEYS IN NEW BRUNSWICK: ARE RESULTS RELIABLE FOR MOOSE?
title_fullStr POTVIN DOUBLE-COUNT AERIAL SURVEYS IN NEW BRUNSWICK: ARE RESULTS RELIABLE FOR MOOSE?
title_full_unstemmed POTVIN DOUBLE-COUNT AERIAL SURVEYS IN NEW BRUNSWICK: ARE RESULTS RELIABLE FOR MOOSE?
title_sort potvin double-count aerial surveys in new brunswick: are results reliable for moose?
publisher Lakehead University
publishDate 2012
url http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/98
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source Alces: A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose; Vol. 48 (2012); 67-77
2293-6629
0835-5851
op_relation http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/98/137
http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/98
_version_ 1802012417020919808