MOOSE-PREDATOR RELATIONSHIPS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT NEEDS

Since the 1984 Swedish Moose Symposium our knowledge of moose (Alces alces)-predator relationships has substantially improved. Wolves (Canis lupus), brown or grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), black bears (U. americanus), and recently, cougars (Puma concolor) have been identified as major predators of mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ballard, Warren B., Van Ballenberghe, Victor
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Lakehead University 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/715
id ftjalces:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/715
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjalces:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/715 2023-05-15T13:13:21+02:00 MOOSE-PREDATOR RELATIONSHIPS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT NEEDS Ballard, Warren B. Van Ballenberghe, Victor 1998-01-01 application/pdf http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/715 eng eng Lakehead University http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/715/797 http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/715 Alces: A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose; Vol. 34 No. 1 (1998): Alces Vol. 34 No. 1 (1998); 91-105 2293-6629 0835-5851 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 1998 ftjalces 2022-02-12T19:35:52Z Since the 1984 Swedish Moose Symposium our knowledge of moose (Alces alces)-predator relationships has substantially improved. Wolves (Canis lupus), brown or grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), black bears (U. americanus), and recently, cougars (Puma concolor) have been identified as major predators of moose. During the past 2 decades, a number of studies have identified the role of predation as either limiting or regulating moose population growth. However, confusion over misuse-use to terminology has hindered out understanding of these relationships. Regulating factors are composed solely of density-dependent factors which keep populations in equilibrium or cause them to return to equilibrium. Whether a wolf functional response (i.e., per capita kill rate) is, in fact, related to moose density has come under scrutiny. There may be no biological justification for using a functional response in modeling exercises as wolf kill rates appear rather constant over a wide range of moose densities. Wolf numerical and functional responses are curvilinear relative to moose density and may be prey species specific. Knowledge of bear predation is inadequate to accurately model moose population trends. Whether predation regulates or limits moose population growth may be academic if reductions in predator numbers allow managers to increase moose populations and harvest yields. Managers currently have the biological tools to effectively manage moose-predator relationships. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Canis lupus Ursus arctos Alces (A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose)
institution Open Polar
collection Alces (A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose)
op_collection_id ftjalces
language English
description Since the 1984 Swedish Moose Symposium our knowledge of moose (Alces alces)-predator relationships has substantially improved. Wolves (Canis lupus), brown or grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), black bears (U. americanus), and recently, cougars (Puma concolor) have been identified as major predators of moose. During the past 2 decades, a number of studies have identified the role of predation as either limiting or regulating moose population growth. However, confusion over misuse-use to terminology has hindered out understanding of these relationships. Regulating factors are composed solely of density-dependent factors which keep populations in equilibrium or cause them to return to equilibrium. Whether a wolf functional response (i.e., per capita kill rate) is, in fact, related to moose density has come under scrutiny. There may be no biological justification for using a functional response in modeling exercises as wolf kill rates appear rather constant over a wide range of moose densities. Wolf numerical and functional responses are curvilinear relative to moose density and may be prey species specific. Knowledge of bear predation is inadequate to accurately model moose population trends. Whether predation regulates or limits moose population growth may be academic if reductions in predator numbers allow managers to increase moose populations and harvest yields. Managers currently have the biological tools to effectively manage moose-predator relationships.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ballard, Warren B.
Van Ballenberghe, Victor
spellingShingle Ballard, Warren B.
Van Ballenberghe, Victor
MOOSE-PREDATOR RELATIONSHIPS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT NEEDS
author_facet Ballard, Warren B.
Van Ballenberghe, Victor
author_sort Ballard, Warren B.
title MOOSE-PREDATOR RELATIONSHIPS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT NEEDS
title_short MOOSE-PREDATOR RELATIONSHIPS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT NEEDS
title_full MOOSE-PREDATOR RELATIONSHIPS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT NEEDS
title_fullStr MOOSE-PREDATOR RELATIONSHIPS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT NEEDS
title_full_unstemmed MOOSE-PREDATOR RELATIONSHIPS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT NEEDS
title_sort moose-predator relationships: research and management needs
publisher Lakehead University
publishDate 1998
url http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/715
genre Alces alces
Canis lupus
Ursus arctos
genre_facet Alces alces
Canis lupus
Ursus arctos
op_source Alces: A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose; Vol. 34 No. 1 (1998): Alces Vol. 34 No. 1 (1998); 91-105
2293-6629
0835-5851
op_relation http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/715/797
http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/715
_version_ 1766257791247319040