A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO MOOSE POPULATION ASSESSMENT AND HARVEST DECISION

Assessments of ungulate populations need to be expressed in probabilistic terms to convey uncertainty about key parameters and the consequences or “risks” of alternative policies for harvest. The use of Bayesian estimation and risk assessment is described and applied to a declining moose (Alces alce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hatter, Ian W.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Lakehead University 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/707
id ftjalces:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/707
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjalces:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/707 2023-05-15T13:13:21+02:00 A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO MOOSE POPULATION ASSESSMENT AND HARVEST DECISION Hatter, Ian W. 1998-01-01 application/pdf http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/707 eng eng Lakehead University http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/707/789 http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/707 Alces: A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose; Vol. 34 No. 1 (1998): Alces Vol. 34 No. 1 (1998); 47-58 2293-6629 0835-5851 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 1998 ftjalces 2022-02-12T19:35:52Z Assessments of ungulate populations need to be expressed in probabilistic terms to convey uncertainty about key parameters and the consequences or “risks” of alternative policies for harvest. The use of Bayesian estimation and risk assessment is described and applied to a declining moose (Alces alces) population in north-eastern British Columbia. A simple balance model was used to calculate posterior distributions of probability for population size of adults at the start of the assessment period and recruitment rate of calves. Model inputs included two mid-winter surveys of absolute abundance, a herd-composition survey and a harvest/effort index for adult bull moose. Calf recruitment was positively density dependent at moderate to high densities of moose. Probability distributions were estimated for moose population size in 1988 (95% CI’s: 7,655 - 10,550) and 1995 (95% CI’s: 3,805 - 5,980). Risk functions were used to determine the probability of obtaining various adult sex ratios after 3 years of additional bull harvest. Some of the limitations of the moose assessment were that not all of the model parameters were treated as uncertain, that deterministic assumptions about population dynamics were used, and that the behaviour of this predator-ungulate system at low densities of moose was poorly understood. This can bias the degree of certainty in estimates of parameters and risk associated with various harvest policies. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Alces (A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose)
institution Open Polar
collection Alces (A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose)
op_collection_id ftjalces
language English
description Assessments of ungulate populations need to be expressed in probabilistic terms to convey uncertainty about key parameters and the consequences or “risks” of alternative policies for harvest. The use of Bayesian estimation and risk assessment is described and applied to a declining moose (Alces alces) population in north-eastern British Columbia. A simple balance model was used to calculate posterior distributions of probability for population size of adults at the start of the assessment period and recruitment rate of calves. Model inputs included two mid-winter surveys of absolute abundance, a herd-composition survey and a harvest/effort index for adult bull moose. Calf recruitment was positively density dependent at moderate to high densities of moose. Probability distributions were estimated for moose population size in 1988 (95% CI’s: 7,655 - 10,550) and 1995 (95% CI’s: 3,805 - 5,980). Risk functions were used to determine the probability of obtaining various adult sex ratios after 3 years of additional bull harvest. Some of the limitations of the moose assessment were that not all of the model parameters were treated as uncertain, that deterministic assumptions about population dynamics were used, and that the behaviour of this predator-ungulate system at low densities of moose was poorly understood. This can bias the degree of certainty in estimates of parameters and risk associated with various harvest policies.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hatter, Ian W.
spellingShingle Hatter, Ian W.
A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO MOOSE POPULATION ASSESSMENT AND HARVEST DECISION
author_facet Hatter, Ian W.
author_sort Hatter, Ian W.
title A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO MOOSE POPULATION ASSESSMENT AND HARVEST DECISION
title_short A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO MOOSE POPULATION ASSESSMENT AND HARVEST DECISION
title_full A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO MOOSE POPULATION ASSESSMENT AND HARVEST DECISION
title_fullStr A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO MOOSE POPULATION ASSESSMENT AND HARVEST DECISION
title_full_unstemmed A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO MOOSE POPULATION ASSESSMENT AND HARVEST DECISION
title_sort bayesian approach to moose population assessment and harvest decision
publisher Lakehead University
publishDate 1998
url http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/707
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source Alces: A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose; Vol. 34 No. 1 (1998): Alces Vol. 34 No. 1 (1998); 47-58
2293-6629
0835-5851
op_relation http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/707/789
http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/707
_version_ 1766257789075718144