USING GPS AND GIS FOR NAVIGATION AND MARK-RECAPTURE FOR SIGHTABILITY CORRECTION IN MOOSE INVENTORIES

To increase survey efficiency and accuracy we used Global Positioning System (GPS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) technologies during a stratified random block survey of moose (Alces alces) in northeastern British Columbia. We used on-board computer mapping for navigations and data recordin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Poole, K. G., Mowat, G., Pritchard, D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Lakehead University 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/659
id ftjalces:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/659
record_format openpolar
spelling ftjalces:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/659 2023-05-15T13:13:24+02:00 USING GPS AND GIS FOR NAVIGATION AND MARK-RECAPTURE FOR SIGHTABILITY CORRECTION IN MOOSE INVENTORIES Poole, K. G. Mowat, G. Pritchard, D. 1999-01-01 application/pdf http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/659 eng eng Lakehead University http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/659/741 http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/659 Alces: A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose; Vol. 35 (1999): Alces Vol. 35 (1999); 1-10 2293-6629 0835-5851 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 1999 ftjalces 2022-02-12T19:35:49Z To increase survey efficiency and accuracy we used Global Positioning System (GPS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) technologies during a stratified random block survey of moose (Alces alces) in northeastern British Columbia. We used on-board computer mapping for navigations and data recording, and assessed the use of a mark-recapture procedure to correct for moose sightability bias. Aircraft position was visible on a GIS base map on a laptop computer. We used function keys to place numbered labels on the map indicating the sex and age class of the animals observed. The mapping program helped ensure that survey unit (SU) coverage was complete and aided in location decisions close to SU boundaries. We immediately resurveyed 1/4 of each SU at approximately twice the intensity, noting whether animals were seen previously observed or new moose. We calculated a sightability correction factor (SCF) for each stratum (1.31, 1.06, and 1.33 for low, medium, and high density strata, respectively) using standard double sampling methods, and obtained a population estimate about 15% lower than calculated using the mark-recapture based SCF of 1.44. The GPS and GIS technologies we used appeared to enhance survey efficiency, and we recommend these technologies in most survey situations. We also suggest further examination of mark-recapture correction factors and increased efforts to test aerial sightability models. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Alces (A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose)
institution Open Polar
collection Alces (A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose)
op_collection_id ftjalces
language English
description To increase survey efficiency and accuracy we used Global Positioning System (GPS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) technologies during a stratified random block survey of moose (Alces alces) in northeastern British Columbia. We used on-board computer mapping for navigations and data recording, and assessed the use of a mark-recapture procedure to correct for moose sightability bias. Aircraft position was visible on a GIS base map on a laptop computer. We used function keys to place numbered labels on the map indicating the sex and age class of the animals observed. The mapping program helped ensure that survey unit (SU) coverage was complete and aided in location decisions close to SU boundaries. We immediately resurveyed 1/4 of each SU at approximately twice the intensity, noting whether animals were seen previously observed or new moose. We calculated a sightability correction factor (SCF) for each stratum (1.31, 1.06, and 1.33 for low, medium, and high density strata, respectively) using standard double sampling methods, and obtained a population estimate about 15% lower than calculated using the mark-recapture based SCF of 1.44. The GPS and GIS technologies we used appeared to enhance survey efficiency, and we recommend these technologies in most survey situations. We also suggest further examination of mark-recapture correction factors and increased efforts to test aerial sightability models.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Poole, K. G.
Mowat, G.
Pritchard, D.
spellingShingle Poole, K. G.
Mowat, G.
Pritchard, D.
USING GPS AND GIS FOR NAVIGATION AND MARK-RECAPTURE FOR SIGHTABILITY CORRECTION IN MOOSE INVENTORIES
author_facet Poole, K. G.
Mowat, G.
Pritchard, D.
author_sort Poole, K. G.
title USING GPS AND GIS FOR NAVIGATION AND MARK-RECAPTURE FOR SIGHTABILITY CORRECTION IN MOOSE INVENTORIES
title_short USING GPS AND GIS FOR NAVIGATION AND MARK-RECAPTURE FOR SIGHTABILITY CORRECTION IN MOOSE INVENTORIES
title_full USING GPS AND GIS FOR NAVIGATION AND MARK-RECAPTURE FOR SIGHTABILITY CORRECTION IN MOOSE INVENTORIES
title_fullStr USING GPS AND GIS FOR NAVIGATION AND MARK-RECAPTURE FOR SIGHTABILITY CORRECTION IN MOOSE INVENTORIES
title_full_unstemmed USING GPS AND GIS FOR NAVIGATION AND MARK-RECAPTURE FOR SIGHTABILITY CORRECTION IN MOOSE INVENTORIES
title_sort using gps and gis for navigation and mark-recapture for sightability correction in moose inventories
publisher Lakehead University
publishDate 1999
url http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/659
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source Alces: A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose; Vol. 35 (1999): Alces Vol. 35 (1999); 1-10
2293-6629
0835-5851
op_relation http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/659/741
http://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/659
_version_ 1766258144489504768