Experimental study and kinetic modeling of high temperature and pressure CO2 mineralization

The potential for in-situ CO2 sequestration was analyzed experimentally for one basaltic hyaloclastite sample from the Nesjavellir geothermal reservoir in Iceland and three metasedimentary rock samples from the Kızıldere geothermal field in Turkey. Based on batch reaction experiments, this paper d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Main Authors: Berndsen,M., Erol,S., Akın,T., Akın,S., Nardini,I., Immenhauser,A., Nehler,M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11147/14299
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104044
id ftiztech:oai:gcris.iyte.edu.tr:11147/14299
record_format openpolar
spelling ftiztech:oai:gcris.iyte.edu.tr:11147/14299 2024-09-15T18:14:10+00:00 Experimental study and kinetic modeling of high temperature and pressure CO2 mineralization Berndsen,M. Erol,S. Akın,T. Akın,S. Nardini,I. Immenhauser,A. Nehler,M. 2024 https://hdl.handle.net/11147/14299 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104044 en eng Elsevier Ltd International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı 1750-5836 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104044 https://hdl.handle.net/11147/14299 132 2-s2.0-85182884294 doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104044 Q2 Q1 open Batch reactor experiment COsub>2/sub> injection Geothermal PHREEQC Article 2024 ftiztech https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104044 2024-07-09T14:15:29Z The potential for in-situ CO2 sequestration was analyzed experimentally for one basaltic hyaloclastite sample from the Nesjavellir geothermal reservoir in Iceland and three metasedimentary rock samples from the Kızıldere geothermal field in Turkey. Based on batch reaction experiments, this paper demonstrates the interaction between a CO2 gas-charged fluid and rock samples from these reservoirs. The experiments were conducted at 260 °C and 0.8 MPa, and 105 °C and 17 MPa for the basaltic and metasedimentary rocks, respectively. The experimental results indicate that CO2 sequestration within the glassy basaltic rocks is hampered by zeolite, chlorite, and anhydrite, which compete with carbonate minerals to uptake divalent cations at the P-T conditions applied. In contrast, the carbonation process for the metasedimentary rocks is inhibited by their mineralogical composition. Generally, these rocks are less reactive and provide an insufficient supply of divalent cations. The batch reactor experiments were numerically simulated with the PHREEQC geochemical modeling program. The simulations indicate that CO2 sequestration is feasible at the tested P-T conditions, provided that silicate and SO4 mineralization is suppressed for the basaltic rocks and that there is an effective source of divalent cations for the metasedimentary rocks. © 2023 Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Izmir Institute of Technology: DSpace@IZTECH International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 132 104044
institution Open Polar
collection Izmir Institute of Technology: DSpace@IZTECH
op_collection_id ftiztech
language English
topic Batch reactor experiment
COsub>2/sub> injection
Geothermal
PHREEQC
spellingShingle Batch reactor experiment
COsub>2/sub> injection
Geothermal
PHREEQC
Berndsen,M.
Erol,S.
Akın,T.
Akın,S.
Nardini,I.
Immenhauser,A.
Nehler,M.
Experimental study and kinetic modeling of high temperature and pressure CO2 mineralization
topic_facet Batch reactor experiment
COsub>2/sub> injection
Geothermal
PHREEQC
description The potential for in-situ CO2 sequestration was analyzed experimentally for one basaltic hyaloclastite sample from the Nesjavellir geothermal reservoir in Iceland and three metasedimentary rock samples from the Kızıldere geothermal field in Turkey. Based on batch reaction experiments, this paper demonstrates the interaction between a CO2 gas-charged fluid and rock samples from these reservoirs. The experiments were conducted at 260 °C and 0.8 MPa, and 105 °C and 17 MPa for the basaltic and metasedimentary rocks, respectively. The experimental results indicate that CO2 sequestration within the glassy basaltic rocks is hampered by zeolite, chlorite, and anhydrite, which compete with carbonate minerals to uptake divalent cations at the P-T conditions applied. In contrast, the carbonation process for the metasedimentary rocks is inhibited by their mineralogical composition. Generally, these rocks are less reactive and provide an insufficient supply of divalent cations. The batch reactor experiments were numerically simulated with the PHREEQC geochemical modeling program. The simulations indicate that CO2 sequestration is feasible at the tested P-T conditions, provided that silicate and SO4 mineralization is suppressed for the basaltic rocks and that there is an effective source of divalent cations for the metasedimentary rocks. © 2023
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Berndsen,M.
Erol,S.
Akın,T.
Akın,S.
Nardini,I.
Immenhauser,A.
Nehler,M.
author_facet Berndsen,M.
Erol,S.
Akın,T.
Akın,S.
Nardini,I.
Immenhauser,A.
Nehler,M.
author_sort Berndsen,M.
title Experimental study and kinetic modeling of high temperature and pressure CO2 mineralization
title_short Experimental study and kinetic modeling of high temperature and pressure CO2 mineralization
title_full Experimental study and kinetic modeling of high temperature and pressure CO2 mineralization
title_fullStr Experimental study and kinetic modeling of high temperature and pressure CO2 mineralization
title_full_unstemmed Experimental study and kinetic modeling of high temperature and pressure CO2 mineralization
title_sort experimental study and kinetic modeling of high temperature and pressure co2 mineralization
publisher Elsevier Ltd
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/11147/14299
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104044
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
1750-5836
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104044
https://hdl.handle.net/11147/14299
132
2-s2.0-85182884294
doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104044
Q2
Q1
op_rights open
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104044
container_title International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
container_volume 132
container_start_page 104044
_version_ 1810451941214388224