Mid-term Evaluation of the Cultural Heritage Sector Under the EEA Grants 2009-2014
The EEA Grants in the current period have been allocated to programmes defined at national level, instead of to individual projects. These programmes have been implemented according to the Regulation and after a process of negotiation between the donors and the European Commission and then between t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Center for Strategy and Evaluation Services
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://issuelab.org/resources/26850/26850.pdf https://issuelab.org/permalink/resource/26850 |
id |
ftissuelab:oai:harvest.issuelab.org:26850 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftissuelab:oai:harvest.issuelab.org:26850 2023-05-15T16:52:17+02:00 Mid-term Evaluation of the Cultural Heritage Sector Under the EEA Grants 2009-2014 James Rampton Malin Carlberg Europe (Central) / Czech Republic Europe (Central) / Hungary Europe (Central) / Liechtenstein Europe (Central) / Poland Europe (Central) / Romania Europe (Central) / Slovakia Europe (Central) / Slovenia Europe (Northern) / Estonia Europe (Northern) / Iceland Europe (Northern) / Latvia Europe (Northern) / Lithuania Europe (Scandinavia) / Norway Europe (Southeastern) / Bulgaria Europe (Southern) / Malta Europe (Southern) / Portugal Europe (Southern) / Spain Mediterranean (Eastern) / Cyprus 2015-09-09 pdf https://issuelab.org/resources/26850/26850.pdf https://issuelab.org/permalink/resource/26850 eng eng Center for Strategy and Evaluation Services https://www.issuelab.org/resources/26850/pdf_cover_285.png https://issuelab.org/resources/26850/26850.pdf https://issuelab.org/permalink/resource/26850 Copyright 2015 by Center for Strategy and Evaluation Services. Community and Economic Development Nonprofits and Philanthropy report 2015 ftissuelab 2022-01-09T08:52:59Z The EEA Grants in the current period have been allocated to programmes defined at national level, instead of to individual projects. These programmes have been implemented according to the Regulation and after a process of negotiation between the donors and the European Commission and then between the donors and the beneficiary countries. This negotiation has concerned, first, the Memorandum of Understanding and, second, the specific Programme Agreements. The process of negotiation and of preparing open calls for proposals has taken significantly longer than expected. This has led to severe delays in the allocation of funds and significantly reduced the time available to implement projects. However, there is broad support for the programme-based approach, as it could further improve the strategic focus and simplify the management arrangements. Given the time and effort that has been expended in setting up the programme-based approach, consideration should be given as to whether this approach should be retained for the next period. Stakeholders from the donor and beneficiary countries should consider whether negotiations can be concluded much more easily the second time round and whether programme management capacity can be retained. Where this is the case, the programme-based approach should be continued. There would be potential benefits from extending the end-date for completing expenditure and/or extending the programme period from 5 to 7 years. Monitoring indicators are appropriate, although many outcomes do not easily lend themselves to measurement and quantification. Qualitative reporting therefore remains important alongside monitoring of quantitative outputs. Report Iceland IssueLab (Nonprofit Research) Norway |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
IssueLab (Nonprofit Research) |
op_collection_id |
ftissuelab |
language |
English |
topic |
Community and Economic Development Nonprofits and Philanthropy |
spellingShingle |
Community and Economic Development Nonprofits and Philanthropy James Rampton Malin Carlberg Mid-term Evaluation of the Cultural Heritage Sector Under the EEA Grants 2009-2014 |
topic_facet |
Community and Economic Development Nonprofits and Philanthropy |
description |
The EEA Grants in the current period have been allocated to programmes defined at national level, instead of to individual projects. These programmes have been implemented according to the Regulation and after a process of negotiation between the donors and the European Commission and then between the donors and the beneficiary countries. This negotiation has concerned, first, the Memorandum of Understanding and, second, the specific Programme Agreements. The process of negotiation and of preparing open calls for proposals has taken significantly longer than expected. This has led to severe delays in the allocation of funds and significantly reduced the time available to implement projects. However, there is broad support for the programme-based approach, as it could further improve the strategic focus and simplify the management arrangements. Given the time and effort that has been expended in setting up the programme-based approach, consideration should be given as to whether this approach should be retained for the next period. Stakeholders from the donor and beneficiary countries should consider whether negotiations can be concluded much more easily the second time round and whether programme management capacity can be retained. Where this is the case, the programme-based approach should be continued. There would be potential benefits from extending the end-date for completing expenditure and/or extending the programme period from 5 to 7 years. Monitoring indicators are appropriate, although many outcomes do not easily lend themselves to measurement and quantification. Qualitative reporting therefore remains important alongside monitoring of quantitative outputs. |
format |
Report |
author |
James Rampton Malin Carlberg |
author_facet |
James Rampton Malin Carlberg |
author_sort |
James Rampton |
title |
Mid-term Evaluation of the Cultural Heritage Sector Under the EEA Grants 2009-2014 |
title_short |
Mid-term Evaluation of the Cultural Heritage Sector Under the EEA Grants 2009-2014 |
title_full |
Mid-term Evaluation of the Cultural Heritage Sector Under the EEA Grants 2009-2014 |
title_fullStr |
Mid-term Evaluation of the Cultural Heritage Sector Under the EEA Grants 2009-2014 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mid-term Evaluation of the Cultural Heritage Sector Under the EEA Grants 2009-2014 |
title_sort |
mid-term evaluation of the cultural heritage sector under the eea grants 2009-2014 |
publisher |
Center for Strategy and Evaluation Services |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://issuelab.org/resources/26850/26850.pdf https://issuelab.org/permalink/resource/26850 |
op_coverage |
Europe (Central) / Czech Republic Europe (Central) / Hungary Europe (Central) / Liechtenstein Europe (Central) / Poland Europe (Central) / Romania Europe (Central) / Slovakia Europe (Central) / Slovenia Europe (Northern) / Estonia Europe (Northern) / Iceland Europe (Northern) / Latvia Europe (Northern) / Lithuania Europe (Scandinavia) / Norway Europe (Southeastern) / Bulgaria Europe (Southern) / Malta Europe (Southern) / Portugal Europe (Southern) / Spain Mediterranean (Eastern) / Cyprus |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
https://www.issuelab.org/resources/26850/pdf_cover_285.png https://issuelab.org/resources/26850/26850.pdf https://issuelab.org/permalink/resource/26850 |
op_rights |
Copyright 2015 by Center for Strategy and Evaluation Services. |
_version_ |
1766042436534009856 |