Comparison of CMAM simulations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) with observations from Odin/SMR, ACE-FTS, and Aura/MLS

International audience Simulations of CO, N2O and CH4 from a coupled chemistry-climate model (CMAM) are compared with satellite measurements from Odin Sub-Millimeter Radiometer (Odin/SMR), Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS), and Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (Aur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Jin, J.J., Semeniuk, K., R. Beagley, S., I. Fomichev, V., I. Jonsson, A., C. Mcconnell, J., Urban, Jakub, Murtagh, D., L. Manney, G., D. Boone, C., F. Bernath, P., A. Walker, K., Barret, Brice, Ricaud, P., Dupuy, E.
Other Authors: Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering York University - Toronto (ESSE), York University Toronto, Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Department of Radio and Space Science Göteborg, Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology New Mexico Tech (NMT), Department of Chemistry Waterloo, University of Waterloo Waterloo, Department of Chemistry York, UK, University of York York, UK, Laboratoire d'aérologie (LAERO), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.science/hal-00992114
https://hal.science/hal-00992114/document
https://hal.science/hal-00992114/file/acp-9-3233-2009.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009
id ftinsu:oai:HAL:hal-00992114v1
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSU
op_collection_id ftinsu
language English
topic [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph]
spellingShingle [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph]
Jin, J.J.
Semeniuk, K.
R. Beagley, S.
I. Fomichev, V.
I. Jonsson, A.
C. Mcconnell, J.
Urban, Jakub
Murtagh, D.
L. Manney, G.
D. Boone, C.
F. Bernath, P.
A. Walker, K.
Barret, Brice
Ricaud, P.
Dupuy, E.
Comparison of CMAM simulations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) with observations from Odin/SMR, ACE-FTS, and Aura/MLS
topic_facet [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph]
description International audience Simulations of CO, N2O and CH4 from a coupled chemistry-climate model (CMAM) are compared with satellite measurements from Odin Sub-Millimeter Radiometer (Odin/SMR), Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS), and Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (Aura/MLS). Pressure-latitude cross-sections and seasonal time series demonstrate that CMAM reproduces the observed global CO, N2O, and CH4 distributions quite well. Generally, excellent agreement with measurements is found between CO simulations and observations in the stratosphere and mesosphere. Differences between the simulations and the ACE-FTS observations are generally within 30%, and the differences between CMAM results and SMR and MLS observations are slightly larger. These differences are comparable with the difference between the instruments in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. Comparisons of N2O show that CMAM results are usually within 15% of the measurements in the lower and middle stratosphere, and the observations are close to each other. However, the standard version of CMAM has a low N2O bias in the upper stratosphere. The CMAM CH4 distribution also reproduces the observations in the lower stratosphere, but has a similar but smaller negative bias in the upper stratosphere. The negative bias may be due to that the gravity drag is not fully resolved in the model. The simulated polar CO evolution in the Arctic and Antarctic agrees with the ACE and MLS observations. CO measurements from 2006 show evidence of enhanced descent of air from the mesosphere into the stratosphere in the Arctic after strong stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs). CMAM also shows strong descent of air after SSWs. In the tropics, CMAM captures the annual oscillation in the lower stratosphere and the semiannual oscillations at the stratopause and mesopause seen in Aura/MLS CO and N2O observations and in Odin/SMR N2O observations. The Odin/SMR and Aura/MLS N2O observations also show a quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) in the upper ...
author2 Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering York University - Toronto (ESSE)
York University Toronto
Department of Physics
University of Toronto
Department of Radio and Space Science Göteborg
Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH)
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology New Mexico Tech (NMT)
Department of Chemistry Waterloo
University of Waterloo Waterloo
Department of Chemistry York, UK
University of York York, UK
Laboratoire d'aérologie (LAERO)
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jin, J.J.
Semeniuk, K.
R. Beagley, S.
I. Fomichev, V.
I. Jonsson, A.
C. Mcconnell, J.
Urban, Jakub
Murtagh, D.
L. Manney, G.
D. Boone, C.
F. Bernath, P.
A. Walker, K.
Barret, Brice
Ricaud, P.
Dupuy, E.
author_facet Jin, J.J.
Semeniuk, K.
R. Beagley, S.
I. Fomichev, V.
I. Jonsson, A.
C. Mcconnell, J.
Urban, Jakub
Murtagh, D.
L. Manney, G.
D. Boone, C.
F. Bernath, P.
A. Walker, K.
Barret, Brice
Ricaud, P.
Dupuy, E.
author_sort Jin, J.J.
title Comparison of CMAM simulations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) with observations from Odin/SMR, ACE-FTS, and Aura/MLS
title_short Comparison of CMAM simulations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) with observations from Odin/SMR, ACE-FTS, and Aura/MLS
title_full Comparison of CMAM simulations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) with observations from Odin/SMR, ACE-FTS, and Aura/MLS
title_fullStr Comparison of CMAM simulations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) with observations from Odin/SMR, ACE-FTS, and Aura/MLS
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CMAM simulations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) with observations from Odin/SMR, ACE-FTS, and Aura/MLS
title_sort comparison of cmam simulations of carbon monoxide (co), nitrous oxide (n2o), and methane (ch4) with observations from odin/smr, ace-fts, and aura/mls
publisher HAL CCSD
publishDate 2009
url https://hal.science/hal-00992114
https://hal.science/hal-00992114/document
https://hal.science/hal-00992114/file/acp-9-3233-2009.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
op_source ISSN: 1680-7316
EISSN: 1680-7324
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
https://hal.science/hal-00992114
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009, 9 (10), pp.3233-3252. ⟨10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009⟩
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009
hal-00992114
https://hal.science/hal-00992114
https://hal.science/hal-00992114/document
https://hal.science/hal-00992114/file/acp-9-3233-2009.pdf
doi:10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 9
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3233
op_container_end_page 3252
_version_ 1785546541282361344
spelling ftinsu:oai:HAL:hal-00992114v1 2023-12-17T10:22:19+01:00 Comparison of CMAM simulations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) with observations from Odin/SMR, ACE-FTS, and Aura/MLS Jin, J.J. Semeniuk, K. R. Beagley, S. I. Fomichev, V. I. Jonsson, A. C. Mcconnell, J. Urban, Jakub Murtagh, D. L. Manney, G. D. Boone, C. F. Bernath, P. A. Walker, K. Barret, Brice Ricaud, P. Dupuy, E. Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering York University - Toronto (ESSE) York University Toronto Department of Physics University of Toronto Department of Radio and Space Science Göteborg Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH) New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology New Mexico Tech (NMT) Department of Chemistry Waterloo University of Waterloo Waterloo Department of Chemistry York, UK University of York York, UK Laboratoire d'aérologie (LAERO) Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3) Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP) Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3) Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 2009 https://hal.science/hal-00992114 https://hal.science/hal-00992114/document https://hal.science/hal-00992114/file/acp-9-3233-2009.pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009 en eng HAL CCSD European Geosciences Union info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009 hal-00992114 https://hal.science/hal-00992114 https://hal.science/hal-00992114/document https://hal.science/hal-00992114/file/acp-9-3233-2009.pdf doi:10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess ISSN: 1680-7316 EISSN: 1680-7324 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics https://hal.science/hal-00992114 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009, 9 (10), pp.3233-3252. ⟨10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009⟩ [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph] info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2009 ftinsu https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3233-2009 2023-11-22T17:31:02Z International audience Simulations of CO, N2O and CH4 from a coupled chemistry-climate model (CMAM) are compared with satellite measurements from Odin Sub-Millimeter Radiometer (Odin/SMR), Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS), and Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (Aura/MLS). Pressure-latitude cross-sections and seasonal time series demonstrate that CMAM reproduces the observed global CO, N2O, and CH4 distributions quite well. Generally, excellent agreement with measurements is found between CO simulations and observations in the stratosphere and mesosphere. Differences between the simulations and the ACE-FTS observations are generally within 30%, and the differences between CMAM results and SMR and MLS observations are slightly larger. These differences are comparable with the difference between the instruments in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. Comparisons of N2O show that CMAM results are usually within 15% of the measurements in the lower and middle stratosphere, and the observations are close to each other. However, the standard version of CMAM has a low N2O bias in the upper stratosphere. The CMAM CH4 distribution also reproduces the observations in the lower stratosphere, but has a similar but smaller negative bias in the upper stratosphere. The negative bias may be due to that the gravity drag is not fully resolved in the model. The simulated polar CO evolution in the Arctic and Antarctic agrees with the ACE and MLS observations. CO measurements from 2006 show evidence of enhanced descent of air from the mesosphere into the stratosphere in the Arctic after strong stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs). CMAM also shows strong descent of air after SSWs. In the tropics, CMAM captures the annual oscillation in the lower stratosphere and the semiannual oscillations at the stratopause and mesopause seen in Aura/MLS CO and N2O observations and in Odin/SMR N2O observations. The Odin/SMR and Aura/MLS N2O observations also show a quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) in the upper ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSU Antarctic Arctic Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9 10 3233 3252