Do the effects of crops on skylark (Alauda arvensis) differ between the field and landscape scales?
International audience The promotion of biodiversity in agricultural areas involves actions at the landscape scale, and the management of cropping patterns is considered an important means of achieving this goal. However, most of the available knowledge about the impact of crops on biodiversity has...
Published in: | PeerJ |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/document https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/file/peerj-03-1097.pdf https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1097 |
id |
ftinraparis:oai:HAL:hal-01277463v1 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftinraparis:oai:HAL:hal-01277463v1 2024-10-06T13:41:47+00:00 Do the effects of crops on skylark (Alauda arvensis) differ between the field and landscape scales? Sausse, Christophe Barbottin, Aude Jiguet, Frédéric Martin, Philippe Terres Inovia Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires (SADAPT) Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroParisTech Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la COnservation (CESCO) Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 2015-07-16 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/document https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/file/peerj-03-1097.pdf https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1097 en eng HAL CCSD PeerJ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.7717/peerj.1097 hal-01277463 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/document https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/file/peerj-03-1097.pdf doi:10.7717/peerj.1097 PRODINRA: 339762 WOS: 000358691600004 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess ISSN: 2167-8359 PeerJ https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463 PeerJ, 2015, 3, pp.e1097. ⟨10.7717/peerj.1097⟩ https://peerj.com/computer-science/ Cropping system Farmland birds Landscape Maize Rapeseed Skylark Upscaling [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2015 ftinraparis https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1097 2024-09-10T14:44:15Z International audience The promotion of biodiversity in agricultural areas involves actions at the landscape scale, and the management of cropping patterns is considered an important means of achieving this goal. However, most of the available knowledge about the impact of crops on biodiversity has been obtained at the field scale, and is generally grouped together under the umbrella term " crop suitability. " Can field-scale knowledge be used to predict the impact on populations across landscapes? We studied the impact of maize and rapeseed on the abundance of skylark (Alauda arvensis). Field-scale studies in Western Europe have reported diverse impacts on habitat selection and demography. We assessed the consistency between field-scale knowledge and landscape-scale observations, using high-resolution databases describing crops and other habitats for the 4 km 2 grid scales analyzed in the French Breeding Bird Survey. We used generalized linear models to estimate the impact of each studied crop at the landscape scale. We stratified the squares according to the local and geographical contexts, to ensure that the conclusions drawn were valid in a wide range of contexts. Our results were not consistent with field knowledge for rapeseed, and were consistent for maize only in grassland contexts. However, the effect sizes were much smaller than those of structural landscape features. These results suggest that upscaling from the field scale to the landscape scale leads to an integration of new agronomic and ecological processes, making the objects studied more complex than simple " crop * species " pairs. We conclude that the carrying capacity of agricultural landscapes cannot be deduced from the suitability of their components. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alauda arvensis Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRA PeerJ 3 e1097 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRA |
op_collection_id |
ftinraparis |
language |
English |
topic |
Cropping system Farmland birds Landscape Maize Rapeseed Skylark Upscaling [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology |
spellingShingle |
Cropping system Farmland birds Landscape Maize Rapeseed Skylark Upscaling [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology Sausse, Christophe Barbottin, Aude Jiguet, Frédéric Martin, Philippe Do the effects of crops on skylark (Alauda arvensis) differ between the field and landscape scales? |
topic_facet |
Cropping system Farmland birds Landscape Maize Rapeseed Skylark Upscaling [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology |
description |
International audience The promotion of biodiversity in agricultural areas involves actions at the landscape scale, and the management of cropping patterns is considered an important means of achieving this goal. However, most of the available knowledge about the impact of crops on biodiversity has been obtained at the field scale, and is generally grouped together under the umbrella term " crop suitability. " Can field-scale knowledge be used to predict the impact on populations across landscapes? We studied the impact of maize and rapeseed on the abundance of skylark (Alauda arvensis). Field-scale studies in Western Europe have reported diverse impacts on habitat selection and demography. We assessed the consistency between field-scale knowledge and landscape-scale observations, using high-resolution databases describing crops and other habitats for the 4 km 2 grid scales analyzed in the French Breeding Bird Survey. We used generalized linear models to estimate the impact of each studied crop at the landscape scale. We stratified the squares according to the local and geographical contexts, to ensure that the conclusions drawn were valid in a wide range of contexts. Our results were not consistent with field knowledge for rapeseed, and were consistent for maize only in grassland contexts. However, the effect sizes were much smaller than those of structural landscape features. These results suggest that upscaling from the field scale to the landscape scale leads to an integration of new agronomic and ecological processes, making the objects studied more complex than simple " crop * species " pairs. We conclude that the carrying capacity of agricultural landscapes cannot be deduced from the suitability of their components. |
author2 |
Terres Inovia Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires (SADAPT) Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroParisTech Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la COnservation (CESCO) Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Sausse, Christophe Barbottin, Aude Jiguet, Frédéric Martin, Philippe |
author_facet |
Sausse, Christophe Barbottin, Aude Jiguet, Frédéric Martin, Philippe |
author_sort |
Sausse, Christophe |
title |
Do the effects of crops on skylark (Alauda arvensis) differ between the field and landscape scales? |
title_short |
Do the effects of crops on skylark (Alauda arvensis) differ between the field and landscape scales? |
title_full |
Do the effects of crops on skylark (Alauda arvensis) differ between the field and landscape scales? |
title_fullStr |
Do the effects of crops on skylark (Alauda arvensis) differ between the field and landscape scales? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do the effects of crops on skylark (Alauda arvensis) differ between the field and landscape scales? |
title_sort |
do the effects of crops on skylark (alauda arvensis) differ between the field and landscape scales? |
publisher |
HAL CCSD |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/document https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/file/peerj-03-1097.pdf https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1097 |
genre |
Alauda arvensis |
genre_facet |
Alauda arvensis |
op_source |
ISSN: 2167-8359 PeerJ https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463 PeerJ, 2015, 3, pp.e1097. ⟨10.7717/peerj.1097⟩ https://peerj.com/computer-science/ |
op_relation |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.7717/peerj.1097 hal-01277463 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/document https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01277463/file/peerj-03-1097.pdf doi:10.7717/peerj.1097 PRODINRA: 339762 WOS: 000358691600004 |
op_rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1097 |
container_title |
PeerJ |
container_volume |
3 |
container_start_page |
e1097 |
_version_ |
1812180972902285312 |