The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus

In situ measurements of Arctic clouds frequently show that ice crystal number concentrations (ICNCs) are much higher than the number of available ice-nucleating particles (INPs), suggesting that secondary ice production (SIP) may be active. Here we use a Lagrangian parcel model (LPM) and a large-edd...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Sotiropoulou, Georgia, Sullivan, Sylvia, Savre, Julien, Lloyd, Gary, Lachlan-Cope, Thomas, Ekman, Annica M. L., Nenes, Athanasios
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Gottingen, COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1301-2020
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832/files/acp-20-1301-2020.pdf
http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832
id ftinfoscience:oai:infoscience.epfl.ch:275832
record_format openpolar
spelling ftinfoscience:oai:infoscience.epfl.ch:275832 2023-05-15T14:49:20+02:00 The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus Sotiropoulou, Georgia Sullivan, Sylvia Savre, Julien Lloyd, Gary Lachlan-Cope, Thomas Ekman, Annica M. L. Nenes, Athanasios 2020-03-03T10:01:01Z https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1301-2020 https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832/files/acp-20-1301-2020.pdf http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832 unknown Gottingen, COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH isi:000512315200003 doi:10.5194/acp-20-1301-2020 https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832/files/acp-20-1301-2020.pdf http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832 http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832 Text 2020 ftinfoscience https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1301-2020 2023-02-13T22:58:58Z In situ measurements of Arctic clouds frequently show that ice crystal number concentrations (ICNCs) are much higher than the number of available ice-nucleating particles (INPs), suggesting that secondary ice production (SIP) may be active. Here we use a Lagrangian parcel model (LPM) and a large-eddy simulation (LES) to investigate the impact of three SIP mechanisms (rime splintering, breakup from ice-ice collisions and drop shattering) on a summer Arctic stratocumulus case observed during the Aerosol-Cloud Coupling And Climate Interactions in the Arctic (AC-CACIA) campaign. Primary ice alone cannot explain the observed ICNCs, and drop shattering is ineffective in the examined conditions. Only the combination of both rime splintering (RS) and collisional break-up (BR) can explain the observed ICNCs, since both of these mechanisms are weak when activated alone. In contrast to RS, BR is currently not represented in large-scale models; however our results indicate that this may also be a critical ice-multiplication mechanism. In general, low sensitivity of the ICNCs to the assumed INP, to the cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) conditions and also to the choice of BR parameterization is found. Finally, we show that a simplified treatment of SIP, using a LPM constrained by a LES and/or observations, provides a realistic yet computationally efficient way to study SIP effects on clouds. This method can eventually serve as a way to parameterize SIP processes in large-scale models. Text Arctic EPFL Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne) Arctic Rime ENVELOPE(6.483,6.483,62.567,62.567) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20 3 1301 1316
institution Open Polar
collection EPFL Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne)
op_collection_id ftinfoscience
language unknown
description In situ measurements of Arctic clouds frequently show that ice crystal number concentrations (ICNCs) are much higher than the number of available ice-nucleating particles (INPs), suggesting that secondary ice production (SIP) may be active. Here we use a Lagrangian parcel model (LPM) and a large-eddy simulation (LES) to investigate the impact of three SIP mechanisms (rime splintering, breakup from ice-ice collisions and drop shattering) on a summer Arctic stratocumulus case observed during the Aerosol-Cloud Coupling And Climate Interactions in the Arctic (AC-CACIA) campaign. Primary ice alone cannot explain the observed ICNCs, and drop shattering is ineffective in the examined conditions. Only the combination of both rime splintering (RS) and collisional break-up (BR) can explain the observed ICNCs, since both of these mechanisms are weak when activated alone. In contrast to RS, BR is currently not represented in large-scale models; however our results indicate that this may also be a critical ice-multiplication mechanism. In general, low sensitivity of the ICNCs to the assumed INP, to the cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) conditions and also to the choice of BR parameterization is found. Finally, we show that a simplified treatment of SIP, using a LPM constrained by a LES and/or observations, provides a realistic yet computationally efficient way to study SIP effects on clouds. This method can eventually serve as a way to parameterize SIP processes in large-scale models.
format Text
author Sotiropoulou, Georgia
Sullivan, Sylvia
Savre, Julien
Lloyd, Gary
Lachlan-Cope, Thomas
Ekman, Annica M. L.
Nenes, Athanasios
spellingShingle Sotiropoulou, Georgia
Sullivan, Sylvia
Savre, Julien
Lloyd, Gary
Lachlan-Cope, Thomas
Ekman, Annica M. L.
Nenes, Athanasios
The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus
author_facet Sotiropoulou, Georgia
Sullivan, Sylvia
Savre, Julien
Lloyd, Gary
Lachlan-Cope, Thomas
Ekman, Annica M. L.
Nenes, Athanasios
author_sort Sotiropoulou, Georgia
title The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus
title_short The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus
title_full The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus
title_fullStr The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus
title_full_unstemmed The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus
title_sort impact of secondary ice production on arctic stratocumulus
publisher Gottingen, COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1301-2020
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832/files/acp-20-1301-2020.pdf
http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832
long_lat ENVELOPE(6.483,6.483,62.567,62.567)
geographic Arctic
Rime
geographic_facet Arctic
Rime
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832
op_relation isi:000512315200003
doi:10.5194/acp-20-1301-2020
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832/files/acp-20-1301-2020.pdf
http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/275832
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1301-2020
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 20
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1301
op_container_end_page 1316
_version_ 1766320388416995328