Assessing the state of the Barents Sea using indicators: How, when, and where?

Two end-to-end ecosystem models, NORWECOM.E2E and NoBa Atlantis, have been used to explore a selection of indicators from the Barents Sea Management plans (BSMP). The indicators included in the BSMP are a combination of simple (e.g. temperature, biomass, and abundance) and complex (e.g. trophic leve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICES Journal of Marine Science
Main Authors: Hansen, Cecilie, van der Meeren, Gro Ingleid, Loeng, Harald, Skogen, Morten D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2838344
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab053
id ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/2838344
record_format openpolar
spelling ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/2838344 2023-05-15T15:38:40+02:00 Assessing the state of the Barents Sea using indicators: How, when, and where? Hansen, Cecilie van der Meeren, Gro Ingleid Loeng, Harald Skogen, Morten D. 2021 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2838344 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab053 eng eng EC/H2020/727890 EC/H2020/678193 ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2021, 78 (8), 2983-2998. urn:issn:1054-3139 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2838344 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab053 cristin:1963909 2983-2998 78 ICES Journal of Marine Science 8 Peer reviewed Journal article 2021 ftimr https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab053 2022-01-26T23:38:54Z Two end-to-end ecosystem models, NORWECOM.E2E and NoBa Atlantis, have been used to explore a selection of indicators from the Barents Sea Management plans (BSMP). The indicators included in the BSMP are a combination of simple (e.g. temperature, biomass, and abundance) and complex (e.g. trophic level and biomass of functional groups). The abiotic indicators are found to serve more as a tool to report on climate trends rather than being ecological indicators. It is shown that the selected indicators give a good overview of the ecosystem state, but that overarching management targets and lack of connection between indicators and management actions makes it questionable if the indicator system is suitable for direct use in management as such. The lack of socio-economic and economic indicators prevents a holistic view of the system, and an inclusion of these in future management plans is recommended. The evaluated indicators perform well as an assessment of the ecosystem, but consistency and representativeness are extremely dependent on the time and in what area they are sampled. This conclusion strongly supports the inclusion of an observing system simulation experiment in management plans, to make sure that the observations represent the properties that the indicators need. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Barents Sea Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR Barents Sea ICES Journal of Marine Science 78 8 2983 2998
institution Open Polar
collection Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR
op_collection_id ftimr
language English
description Two end-to-end ecosystem models, NORWECOM.E2E and NoBa Atlantis, have been used to explore a selection of indicators from the Barents Sea Management plans (BSMP). The indicators included in the BSMP are a combination of simple (e.g. temperature, biomass, and abundance) and complex (e.g. trophic level and biomass of functional groups). The abiotic indicators are found to serve more as a tool to report on climate trends rather than being ecological indicators. It is shown that the selected indicators give a good overview of the ecosystem state, but that overarching management targets and lack of connection between indicators and management actions makes it questionable if the indicator system is suitable for direct use in management as such. The lack of socio-economic and economic indicators prevents a holistic view of the system, and an inclusion of these in future management plans is recommended. The evaluated indicators perform well as an assessment of the ecosystem, but consistency and representativeness are extremely dependent on the time and in what area they are sampled. This conclusion strongly supports the inclusion of an observing system simulation experiment in management plans, to make sure that the observations represent the properties that the indicators need. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hansen, Cecilie
van der Meeren, Gro Ingleid
Loeng, Harald
Skogen, Morten D.
spellingShingle Hansen, Cecilie
van der Meeren, Gro Ingleid
Loeng, Harald
Skogen, Morten D.
Assessing the state of the Barents Sea using indicators: How, when, and where?
author_facet Hansen, Cecilie
van der Meeren, Gro Ingleid
Loeng, Harald
Skogen, Morten D.
author_sort Hansen, Cecilie
title Assessing the state of the Barents Sea using indicators: How, when, and where?
title_short Assessing the state of the Barents Sea using indicators: How, when, and where?
title_full Assessing the state of the Barents Sea using indicators: How, when, and where?
title_fullStr Assessing the state of the Barents Sea using indicators: How, when, and where?
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the state of the Barents Sea using indicators: How, when, and where?
title_sort assessing the state of the barents sea using indicators: how, when, and where?
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2838344
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab053
geographic Barents Sea
geographic_facet Barents Sea
genre Barents Sea
genre_facet Barents Sea
op_source 2983-2998
78
ICES Journal of Marine Science
8
op_relation EC/H2020/727890
EC/H2020/678193
ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2021, 78 (8), 2983-2998.
urn:issn:1054-3139
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2838344
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab053
cristin:1963909
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab053
container_title ICES Journal of Marine Science
container_volume 78
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2983
op_container_end_page 2998
_version_ 1766369894100631552