Salmon lice evasion, susceptibility, retention, and development differ amongst host salmonid species.

With different ecological characteristics amongst salmonid species, their response to parasitic infestation is likely to vary according to their spatial and temporal overlap with the parasite. This study investigated the host–parasite interactions amongst three species of salmonids and the ectoparas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICES Journal of Marine Science
Main Authors: Bui, Samantha, Haltuunen, Elina, Mohn, Agnes, Vågseth, Tone, Oppedal, Frode
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2480390
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx222
id ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/2480390
record_format openpolar
spelling ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/2480390 2023-05-15T15:29:17+02:00 Salmon lice evasion, susceptibility, retention, and development differ amongst host salmonid species. Bui, Samantha Haltuunen, Elina Mohn, Agnes Vågseth, Tone Oppedal, Frode 2017 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2480390 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx222 eng eng urn:issn:1054-3139 http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2480390 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx222 cristin:1552478 ICES Journal of Marine Science Peer reviewed Journal article 2017 ftimr https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx222 2021-09-23T20:14:16Z With different ecological characteristics amongst salmonid species, their response to parasitic infestation is likely to vary according to their spatial and temporal overlap with the parasite. This study investigated the host–parasite interactions amongst three species of salmonids and the ectoparasitic salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis. To determine any variation in infestation parameters amongst salmonids, single population groups of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), chinook salmon (Onchorhynchus tshawytscha), and previously-infested and naïve sea trout (Salmo trutta) were exposed to a controlled infestation challenge. We found that chinook salmon and both sea trout groups were more susceptible to acquiring lice than Atlantic salmon. Behavioural responses during infestation were more pronounced in Atlantic and chinook salmon. Parasite development was similar in lice attached to Atlantic salmon and sea trout, but hindered on chinook salmon. At 16 days post-infestation, chinook salmon had reduced lice loads to the same level as Atlantic salmon, whilst sea trout retained their lice. These results demonstrate differences in interactions with L. salmonis amongst these species, and highlight the vulnerability of sea trout to infestation publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon Salmo salar Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR ICES Journal of Marine Science 75 3 1071 1079
institution Open Polar
collection Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR
op_collection_id ftimr
language English
description With different ecological characteristics amongst salmonid species, their response to parasitic infestation is likely to vary according to their spatial and temporal overlap with the parasite. This study investigated the host–parasite interactions amongst three species of salmonids and the ectoparasitic salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis. To determine any variation in infestation parameters amongst salmonids, single population groups of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), chinook salmon (Onchorhynchus tshawytscha), and previously-infested and naïve sea trout (Salmo trutta) were exposed to a controlled infestation challenge. We found that chinook salmon and both sea trout groups were more susceptible to acquiring lice than Atlantic salmon. Behavioural responses during infestation were more pronounced in Atlantic and chinook salmon. Parasite development was similar in lice attached to Atlantic salmon and sea trout, but hindered on chinook salmon. At 16 days post-infestation, chinook salmon had reduced lice loads to the same level as Atlantic salmon, whilst sea trout retained their lice. These results demonstrate differences in interactions with L. salmonis amongst these species, and highlight the vulnerability of sea trout to infestation publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bui, Samantha
Haltuunen, Elina
Mohn, Agnes
Vågseth, Tone
Oppedal, Frode
spellingShingle Bui, Samantha
Haltuunen, Elina
Mohn, Agnes
Vågseth, Tone
Oppedal, Frode
Salmon lice evasion, susceptibility, retention, and development differ amongst host salmonid species.
author_facet Bui, Samantha
Haltuunen, Elina
Mohn, Agnes
Vågseth, Tone
Oppedal, Frode
author_sort Bui, Samantha
title Salmon lice evasion, susceptibility, retention, and development differ amongst host salmonid species.
title_short Salmon lice evasion, susceptibility, retention, and development differ amongst host salmonid species.
title_full Salmon lice evasion, susceptibility, retention, and development differ amongst host salmonid species.
title_fullStr Salmon lice evasion, susceptibility, retention, and development differ amongst host salmonid species.
title_full_unstemmed Salmon lice evasion, susceptibility, retention, and development differ amongst host salmonid species.
title_sort salmon lice evasion, susceptibility, retention, and development differ amongst host salmonid species.
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2480390
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx222
genre Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
op_source ICES Journal of Marine Science
op_relation urn:issn:1054-3139
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2480390
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx222
cristin:1552478
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx222
container_title ICES Journal of Marine Science
container_volume 75
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1071
op_container_end_page 1079
_version_ 1766359662722023424