Lessons on Marine Protected Area Management in Northern Boreal Regions from the United States and Norway

In comparison to tropical reef systems, relatively few marine protected areas (MPA’s) exist in temperate or subarctic systems (e.g., North Pacific and North Atlantic) where species diversity is lower, abundance of individual species is often higher, and many fish species exhibit large amounts of mov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Fisheries Review
Main Authors: McDermott, Susanne F., Buhl-Mortensen, Lene, Dahle, Geir, Hart, Deborah, Haynie, Alan C., Johannessen, Tore, Moksness, Erlend, Olsen, Esben Moland, Olsen, Erik Joel Steinar, Olson, John V., Spencer, Paul D., Stockhausen, William T.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2478130
https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.79.1.2
id ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/2478130
record_format openpolar
spelling ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/2478130 2023-05-15T13:14:45+02:00 Lessons on Marine Protected Area Management in Northern Boreal Regions from the United States and Norway McDermott, Susanne F. Buhl-Mortensen, Lene Dahle, Geir Hart, Deborah Haynie, Alan C. Johannessen, Tore Moksness, Erlend Olsen, Esben Moland Olsen, Erik Joel Steinar Olson, John V. Spencer, Paul D. Stockhausen, William T. 2017 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2478130 https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.79.1.2 eng eng Marine Fisheries Review. 2017, 79 (1), 28-79. urn:issn:0090-1830 http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2478130 https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.79.1.2 cristin:1545317 28-79 79 Marine Fisheries Review 1 Journal article 2017 ftimr https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.79.1.2 2021-09-23T20:14:13Z In comparison to tropical reef systems, relatively few marine protected areas (MPA’s) exist in temperate or subarctic systems (e.g., North Pacific and North Atlantic) where species diversity is lower, abundance of individual species is often higher, and many fish species exhibit large amounts of movement during one or more of their life stages, especially as adults. A review of MPA’s in three northern areas—the Northwest Atlantic, Northeast Atlantic, and the Northeast Pacific—indicates that MPA’s can be useful management tools towards fisheries management and habitat conservation. However, achieving fishery goals, such as sustainable use of the fisheries resources, will depend on population abundance (relative to unfished conditions) and fish behavior and movement. For example, depleted populations of stationary species such as Atlantic sea scallops, Placopecten magellanicus, in the Northeast Atlantic and European lobster, Homarus grammarus, in the North Sea have responded positively to small MPA’s, whereas migratory offshore Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, and Pacific cod, Gadus macrocephalus, apparently do not appear to benefit from closed areas because of movement into fished areas. Efficient habitat conservation requires detailed habitat mapping on relevant spatial scales. In northern boreal systems with large remote areas, this information is difficult and expensive to access. An alternative strategy of closing and protecting unexploited areas has worked well for the Aleutian Island coral closure area in Alaska. MPA’s can be effective fisheries management tools when the species to be protected have been depleted and show a small to moderate level of movement, and reproductive success is ensured. MPA’s can be effective at preserving habitat when the design is based on scientific information and takes into account the impact on the user groups. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Aleutian Island atlantic cod European lobster Gadus morhua North Atlantic Northeast Atlantic Northwest Atlantic Subarctic Alaska Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR Norway Pacific Marine Fisheries Review 79 1 28 51
institution Open Polar
collection Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR
op_collection_id ftimr
language English
description In comparison to tropical reef systems, relatively few marine protected areas (MPA’s) exist in temperate or subarctic systems (e.g., North Pacific and North Atlantic) where species diversity is lower, abundance of individual species is often higher, and many fish species exhibit large amounts of movement during one or more of their life stages, especially as adults. A review of MPA’s in three northern areas—the Northwest Atlantic, Northeast Atlantic, and the Northeast Pacific—indicates that MPA’s can be useful management tools towards fisheries management and habitat conservation. However, achieving fishery goals, such as sustainable use of the fisheries resources, will depend on population abundance (relative to unfished conditions) and fish behavior and movement. For example, depleted populations of stationary species such as Atlantic sea scallops, Placopecten magellanicus, in the Northeast Atlantic and European lobster, Homarus grammarus, in the North Sea have responded positively to small MPA’s, whereas migratory offshore Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, and Pacific cod, Gadus macrocephalus, apparently do not appear to benefit from closed areas because of movement into fished areas. Efficient habitat conservation requires detailed habitat mapping on relevant spatial scales. In northern boreal systems with large remote areas, this information is difficult and expensive to access. An alternative strategy of closing and protecting unexploited areas has worked well for the Aleutian Island coral closure area in Alaska. MPA’s can be effective fisheries management tools when the species to be protected have been depleted and show a small to moderate level of movement, and reproductive success is ensured. MPA’s can be effective at preserving habitat when the design is based on scientific information and takes into account the impact on the user groups. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author McDermott, Susanne F.
Buhl-Mortensen, Lene
Dahle, Geir
Hart, Deborah
Haynie, Alan C.
Johannessen, Tore
Moksness, Erlend
Olsen, Esben Moland
Olsen, Erik Joel Steinar
Olson, John V.
Spencer, Paul D.
Stockhausen, William T.
spellingShingle McDermott, Susanne F.
Buhl-Mortensen, Lene
Dahle, Geir
Hart, Deborah
Haynie, Alan C.
Johannessen, Tore
Moksness, Erlend
Olsen, Esben Moland
Olsen, Erik Joel Steinar
Olson, John V.
Spencer, Paul D.
Stockhausen, William T.
Lessons on Marine Protected Area Management in Northern Boreal Regions from the United States and Norway
author_facet McDermott, Susanne F.
Buhl-Mortensen, Lene
Dahle, Geir
Hart, Deborah
Haynie, Alan C.
Johannessen, Tore
Moksness, Erlend
Olsen, Esben Moland
Olsen, Erik Joel Steinar
Olson, John V.
Spencer, Paul D.
Stockhausen, William T.
author_sort McDermott, Susanne F.
title Lessons on Marine Protected Area Management in Northern Boreal Regions from the United States and Norway
title_short Lessons on Marine Protected Area Management in Northern Boreal Regions from the United States and Norway
title_full Lessons on Marine Protected Area Management in Northern Boreal Regions from the United States and Norway
title_fullStr Lessons on Marine Protected Area Management in Northern Boreal Regions from the United States and Norway
title_full_unstemmed Lessons on Marine Protected Area Management in Northern Boreal Regions from the United States and Norway
title_sort lessons on marine protected area management in northern boreal regions from the united states and norway
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2478130
https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.79.1.2
geographic Norway
Pacific
geographic_facet Norway
Pacific
genre Aleutian Island
atlantic cod
European lobster
Gadus morhua
North Atlantic
Northeast Atlantic
Northwest Atlantic
Subarctic
Alaska
genre_facet Aleutian Island
atlantic cod
European lobster
Gadus morhua
North Atlantic
Northeast Atlantic
Northwest Atlantic
Subarctic
Alaska
op_source 28-79
79
Marine Fisheries Review
1
op_relation Marine Fisheries Review. 2017, 79 (1), 28-79.
urn:issn:0090-1830
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2478130
https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.79.1.2
cristin:1545317
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.79.1.2
container_title Marine Fisheries Review
container_volume 79
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28
op_container_end_page 51
_version_ 1766265278613684224