A comparison between two sonic measuring systems for demersal fish

Two sonic methods for estimation of abundance of fish stocks, the echo integrator and the digital counter methods, were compared on single and schooling fish in the Lofoten area of Norway during March 1969. Good correlation was obtained between the two systems for both situations, but the slopes of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dowd, R. G., Bakken, Erling, Nakken, Odd
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Fisheries Research Board of Canada 1970
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/108120
id ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/108120
record_format openpolar
spelling ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/108120 2023-05-15T17:08:15+02:00 A comparison between two sonic measuring systems for demersal fish Dowd, R. G. Bakken, Erling Nakken, Odd 1970 221613 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11250/108120 eng eng Fisheries Research Board of Canada urn:issn:0015-296x http://hdl.handle.net/11250/108120 737-742 27 Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 1 Peer reviewed Journal article 1970 ftimr 2021-09-23T20:14:32Z Two sonic methods for estimation of abundance of fish stocks, the echo integrator and the digital counter methods, were compared on single and schooling fish in the Lofoten area of Norway during March 1969. Good correlation was obtained between the two systems for both situations, but the slopes of the regressions of integrated values on the digital counter differed significantly between low and high density fish concentrations. This suggests that the two systems treated the echo information differently, but nevertheless maintained a linear relation between themselves over a wide range of counts. Article in Journal/Newspaper Lofoten Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR Lofoten Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR
op_collection_id ftimr
language English
description Two sonic methods for estimation of abundance of fish stocks, the echo integrator and the digital counter methods, were compared on single and schooling fish in the Lofoten area of Norway during March 1969. Good correlation was obtained between the two systems for both situations, but the slopes of the regressions of integrated values on the digital counter differed significantly between low and high density fish concentrations. This suggests that the two systems treated the echo information differently, but nevertheless maintained a linear relation between themselves over a wide range of counts.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Dowd, R. G.
Bakken, Erling
Nakken, Odd
spellingShingle Dowd, R. G.
Bakken, Erling
Nakken, Odd
A comparison between two sonic measuring systems for demersal fish
author_facet Dowd, R. G.
Bakken, Erling
Nakken, Odd
author_sort Dowd, R. G.
title A comparison between two sonic measuring systems for demersal fish
title_short A comparison between two sonic measuring systems for demersal fish
title_full A comparison between two sonic measuring systems for demersal fish
title_fullStr A comparison between two sonic measuring systems for demersal fish
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between two sonic measuring systems for demersal fish
title_sort comparison between two sonic measuring systems for demersal fish
publisher Fisheries Research Board of Canada
publishDate 1970
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/108120
geographic Lofoten
Norway
geographic_facet Lofoten
Norway
genre Lofoten
genre_facet Lofoten
op_source 737-742
27
Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada
1
op_relation urn:issn:0015-296x
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/108120
_version_ 1766063971921559552