An evaluation of the IMR Summer Bottom Trawl Survey in the Barents Sea

Summary: A committee was formed to evaluate the Institute of Marine Research summer survey in the Barents Sea, which has been conducted annually since 1995. The primary focus of the committee was the survey’s importance for the assessment of Northeast Arctic cod, with a secondary focus on its other...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pennington, Michael
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: ICES 2001
Subjects:
cod
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/106183
id ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/106183
record_format openpolar
spelling ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/106183 2023-05-15T14:30:27+02:00 An evaluation of the IMR Summer Bottom Trawl Survey in the Barents Sea Pennington, Michael 2001 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11250/106183 eng eng ICES ICES CM Documents;2001/P:16 This report is not to be cited without prior reference to the author http://hdl.handle.net/11250/106183 19 s. bottom trawl bunntrål stock assessment bestandsberegning cod torsk survey design toktdesign VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Catch: 925 VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450::Oceanography: 452 Working paper 2001 ftimr 2021-09-23T20:15:44Z Summary: A committee was formed to evaluate the Institute of Marine Research summer survey in the Barents Sea, which has been conducted annually since 1995. The primary focus of the committee was the survey’s importance for the assessment of Northeast Arctic cod, with a secondary focus on its other present or potential uses. It was found that the summer and winter survey indices of cod abundance were consistent, i.e. indicated similar trends in cod abundance, and that for the same amount of effort, the winter survey in the Barents Sea would generate estimates of cod abundance that were much more precise than those from the summer survey. It is concluded that the summer survey does not provide significantly more information for the assessment of cod than the winter survey and the Lofoten acoustic survey of spawning biomass. Thus the summer survey should be continued only if other uses justify its high cost. Report Arctic cod Arctic Barents Sea Lofoten Northeast Arctic cod Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR Arctic Barents Sea Lofoten
institution Open Polar
collection Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR
op_collection_id ftimr
language English
topic bottom trawl
bunntrål
stock assessment
bestandsberegning
cod
torsk
survey design
toktdesign
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Catch: 925
VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450::Oceanography: 452
spellingShingle bottom trawl
bunntrål
stock assessment
bestandsberegning
cod
torsk
survey design
toktdesign
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Catch: 925
VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450::Oceanography: 452
Pennington, Michael
An evaluation of the IMR Summer Bottom Trawl Survey in the Barents Sea
topic_facet bottom trawl
bunntrål
stock assessment
bestandsberegning
cod
torsk
survey design
toktdesign
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Catch: 925
VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450::Oceanography: 452
description Summary: A committee was formed to evaluate the Institute of Marine Research summer survey in the Barents Sea, which has been conducted annually since 1995. The primary focus of the committee was the survey’s importance for the assessment of Northeast Arctic cod, with a secondary focus on its other present or potential uses. It was found that the summer and winter survey indices of cod abundance were consistent, i.e. indicated similar trends in cod abundance, and that for the same amount of effort, the winter survey in the Barents Sea would generate estimates of cod abundance that were much more precise than those from the summer survey. It is concluded that the summer survey does not provide significantly more information for the assessment of cod than the winter survey and the Lofoten acoustic survey of spawning biomass. Thus the summer survey should be continued only if other uses justify its high cost.
format Report
author Pennington, Michael
author_facet Pennington, Michael
author_sort Pennington, Michael
title An evaluation of the IMR Summer Bottom Trawl Survey in the Barents Sea
title_short An evaluation of the IMR Summer Bottom Trawl Survey in the Barents Sea
title_full An evaluation of the IMR Summer Bottom Trawl Survey in the Barents Sea
title_fullStr An evaluation of the IMR Summer Bottom Trawl Survey in the Barents Sea
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the IMR Summer Bottom Trawl Survey in the Barents Sea
title_sort evaluation of the imr summer bottom trawl survey in the barents sea
publisher ICES
publishDate 2001
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/106183
geographic Arctic
Barents Sea
Lofoten
geographic_facet Arctic
Barents Sea
Lofoten
genre Arctic cod
Arctic
Barents Sea
Lofoten
Northeast Arctic cod
genre_facet Arctic cod
Arctic
Barents Sea
Lofoten
Northeast Arctic cod
op_source 19 s.
op_relation ICES CM Documents;2001/P:16
This report is not to be cited without prior reference to the author
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/106183
_version_ 1766304295958872064