The catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (E) and different floatline buoyancy.

The floatline buoyancy seems to influence the catching efficiency of cod gillnets. Trials with different byoyancies in cod gillnet fishing in Northern Norway gave the best catches with a buoyancy of about 65 grammes per metre floatline. Comparative fishing with nets of different hanging ratios showe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelsen, Karl Kr., Haugen, Kjeld, Floen, Svein
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: ICES 1979
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/103329
id ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/103329
record_format openpolar
spelling ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/103329 2023-05-15T17:43:23+02:00 The catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (E) and different floatline buoyancy. Angelsen, Karl Kr. Haugen, Kjeld Floen, Svein 1979 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11250/103329 eng eng ICES ICES CM Documents;1979/B:19 This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/103329 7 s. VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fisheries technology: 924 VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Aquaculture: 922 Working paper 1979 ftimr 2021-09-23T20:14:39Z The floatline buoyancy seems to influence the catching efficiency of cod gillnets. Trials with different byoyancies in cod gillnet fishing in Northern Norway gave the best catches with a buoyancy of about 65 grammes per metre floatline. Comparative fishing with nets of different hanging ratios showed that the usual hanging ratio in Norwegian cod gillnets E = 0.5, is not the most efficient one. The best catch per gillnet was obtained with a hanging ratio of about 0.6 Report Northern Norway Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR
op_collection_id ftimr
language English
topic VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fisheries technology: 924
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Aquaculture: 922
spellingShingle VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fisheries technology: 924
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Aquaculture: 922
Angelsen, Karl Kr.
Haugen, Kjeld
Floen, Svein
The catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (E) and different floatline buoyancy.
topic_facet VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fisheries technology: 924
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Aquaculture: 922
description The floatline buoyancy seems to influence the catching efficiency of cod gillnets. Trials with different byoyancies in cod gillnet fishing in Northern Norway gave the best catches with a buoyancy of about 65 grammes per metre floatline. Comparative fishing with nets of different hanging ratios showed that the usual hanging ratio in Norwegian cod gillnets E = 0.5, is not the most efficient one. The best catch per gillnet was obtained with a hanging ratio of about 0.6
format Report
author Angelsen, Karl Kr.
Haugen, Kjeld
Floen, Svein
author_facet Angelsen, Karl Kr.
Haugen, Kjeld
Floen, Svein
author_sort Angelsen, Karl Kr.
title The catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (E) and different floatline buoyancy.
title_short The catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (E) and different floatline buoyancy.
title_full The catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (E) and different floatline buoyancy.
title_fullStr The catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (E) and different floatline buoyancy.
title_full_unstemmed The catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (E) and different floatline buoyancy.
title_sort catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (e) and different floatline buoyancy.
publisher ICES
publishDate 1979
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/103329
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Northern Norway
genre_facet Northern Norway
op_source 7 s.
op_relation ICES CM Documents;1979/B:19
This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary.
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/103329
_version_ 1766145433420169216