Using artificial neural networks to combine acoustic and trawl data in the Barents and North Seas

Groundfish have a wide and variable distribution making the use of trawling alone a highly inadequate sampling method. Trawl data provide species identification and numbers over a very small area and habitat type while acoustic data provide a wider coverage of the ecosystem, but fail to identify spe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neville, Suzanna, Hjellvik, Vidar, Mackinson, Steven, Kooij, Jeroen van der
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: ICES 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/100719
id ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/100719
record_format openpolar
spelling ftimr:oai:imr.brage.unit.no:11250/100719 2023-05-15T15:38:57+02:00 Using artificial neural networks to combine acoustic and trawl data in the Barents and North Seas Neville, Suzanna Hjellvik, Vidar Mackinson, Steven Kooij, Jeroen van der 2004 445932 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11250/100719 eng eng ICES ICES CM documents 2004/R:05 http://hdl.handle.net/11250/100719 20 s. acoustics trawl stock assessment VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fisheries technology: 924 Working paper 2004 ftimr 2021-09-23T20:15:55Z Groundfish have a wide and variable distribution making the use of trawling alone a highly inadequate sampling method. Trawl data provide species identification and numbers over a very small area and habitat type while acoustic data provide a wider coverage of the ecosystem, but fail to identify species. Both methods provide essential information required for assessing fish stock abundance and distribution, but no systematic method of combining these data has yet been identified. Acoustic and trawl data were collected for both the North and Barents Seas and their relationships investigated using artificial neural networks (ANNs). ANNs are information processing systems that were inspired by the structure of the brain. They can incorporate multiple variables and explore complex interactions between variables in far greater depth than many traditional statistical techniques. This modelling tool has had many successes in environmental modelling and is increasingly being applied in situations where the underlying relationships are poorly known. Network architectures, optimisation of connection weights (learning), model validation, and the reasons for the difference in performance between the North Sea and Barents Sea models are discussed. Report Barents Sea Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR Barents Sea
institution Open Polar
collection Institute for Marine Research: Brage IMR
op_collection_id ftimr
language English
topic acoustics
trawl
stock assessment
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fisheries technology: 924
spellingShingle acoustics
trawl
stock assessment
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fisheries technology: 924
Neville, Suzanna
Hjellvik, Vidar
Mackinson, Steven
Kooij, Jeroen van der
Using artificial neural networks to combine acoustic and trawl data in the Barents and North Seas
topic_facet acoustics
trawl
stock assessment
VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fisheries technology: 924
description Groundfish have a wide and variable distribution making the use of trawling alone a highly inadequate sampling method. Trawl data provide species identification and numbers over a very small area and habitat type while acoustic data provide a wider coverage of the ecosystem, but fail to identify species. Both methods provide essential information required for assessing fish stock abundance and distribution, but no systematic method of combining these data has yet been identified. Acoustic and trawl data were collected for both the North and Barents Seas and their relationships investigated using artificial neural networks (ANNs). ANNs are information processing systems that were inspired by the structure of the brain. They can incorporate multiple variables and explore complex interactions between variables in far greater depth than many traditional statistical techniques. This modelling tool has had many successes in environmental modelling and is increasingly being applied in situations where the underlying relationships are poorly known. Network architectures, optimisation of connection weights (learning), model validation, and the reasons for the difference in performance between the North Sea and Barents Sea models are discussed.
format Report
author Neville, Suzanna
Hjellvik, Vidar
Mackinson, Steven
Kooij, Jeroen van der
author_facet Neville, Suzanna
Hjellvik, Vidar
Mackinson, Steven
Kooij, Jeroen van der
author_sort Neville, Suzanna
title Using artificial neural networks to combine acoustic and trawl data in the Barents and North Seas
title_short Using artificial neural networks to combine acoustic and trawl data in the Barents and North Seas
title_full Using artificial neural networks to combine acoustic and trawl data in the Barents and North Seas
title_fullStr Using artificial neural networks to combine acoustic and trawl data in the Barents and North Seas
title_full_unstemmed Using artificial neural networks to combine acoustic and trawl data in the Barents and North Seas
title_sort using artificial neural networks to combine acoustic and trawl data in the barents and north seas
publisher ICES
publishDate 2004
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/100719
geographic Barents Sea
geographic_facet Barents Sea
genre Barents Sea
genre_facet Barents Sea
op_source 20 s.
op_relation ICES CM documents
2004/R:05
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/100719
_version_ 1766370390456664064