Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty

According to Articles 74(1) and 83(1) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, the maritime boundary delimitation is to be affected by agreement in accordance with international law in order to achieve equitable solution. The rule is inherently vague, controversial and a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/2/49%20ACCEPTANCE%20GHAFUR.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/5/Maritime%20Boundary%20Delimitation%20Presentation%20%28ICDR%202017%29%20%28Prof.%20Ghafur%29%202.pdf
https://icdr2017.org/
id ftiislamicuniv:oai:generic.eprints.org:59261
record_format openpolar
spelling ftiislamicuniv:oai:generic.eprints.org:59261 2023-05-15T16:57:03+02:00 Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein 2017-08-10 application/pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/2/49%20ACCEPTANCE%20GHAFUR.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/5/Maritime%20Boundary%20Delimitation%20Presentation%20%28ICDR%202017%29%20%28Prof.%20Ghafur%29%202.pdf https://icdr2017.org/ en eng http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/2/49%20ACCEPTANCE%20GHAFUR.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/5/Maritime%20Boundary%20Delimitation%20Presentation%20%28ICDR%202017%29%20%28Prof.%20Ghafur%29%202.pdf Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein (2017) Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty. In: International Conference on Dispute Resolution (ICDR) 2017, 9th-10th August 2017, Kuala Lumpur. (Unpublished) KZ Law of Nations Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed 2017 ftiislamicuniv 2022-10-29T13:08:47Z According to Articles 74(1) and 83(1) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, the maritime boundary delimitation is to be affected by agreement in accordance with international law in order to achieve equitable solution. The rule is inherently vague, controversial and allows the courts unprecedented discretionary power to determine how an equitable solution could be achieved. This watered-down and compromised formula of the UNCLOS 1982 is due to lack of consensus among negotiating States at the time of drafting the convention. The present paper makes an analytical study of the decisions of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on this issue in order to examine whether a consistent maritime boundary delimitation approach has been established through the jurisprudence of the courts. The paper traces the evolving trend of judicial precedents from the equitable principles of the Norther Sea Continental Shelf cases to the two -stage approach initiated in Jan Mayen Case and followed in many other cases, to the three-stage approach of the Black Sea and the more recent cases of the Bay of Bengal and the Columbia-Nicaragua. The paper concludes that while over the past three decades a clearer approach to maritime delimitation has emerged through the decisions of the international courts, there are still subjectivity and uncertainty in the choice of basepoints prior to constructing the provisional delimitation line and in the context of the practical application of the established delimitation approach. Conference Object Jan Mayen IIUM Repository (IRep - International Islamic University Malaysia) Jan Mayen
institution Open Polar
collection IIUM Repository (IRep - International Islamic University Malaysia)
op_collection_id ftiislamicuniv
language English
topic KZ Law of Nations
spellingShingle KZ Law of Nations
Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
topic_facet KZ Law of Nations
description According to Articles 74(1) and 83(1) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, the maritime boundary delimitation is to be affected by agreement in accordance with international law in order to achieve equitable solution. The rule is inherently vague, controversial and allows the courts unprecedented discretionary power to determine how an equitable solution could be achieved. This watered-down and compromised formula of the UNCLOS 1982 is due to lack of consensus among negotiating States at the time of drafting the convention. The present paper makes an analytical study of the decisions of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on this issue in order to examine whether a consistent maritime boundary delimitation approach has been established through the jurisprudence of the courts. The paper traces the evolving trend of judicial precedents from the equitable principles of the Norther Sea Continental Shelf cases to the two -stage approach initiated in Jan Mayen Case and followed in many other cases, to the three-stage approach of the Black Sea and the more recent cases of the Bay of Bengal and the Columbia-Nicaragua. The paper concludes that while over the past three decades a clearer approach to maritime delimitation has emerged through the decisions of the international courts, there are still subjectivity and uncertainty in the choice of basepoints prior to constructing the provisional delimitation line and in the context of the practical application of the established delimitation approach.
format Conference Object
author Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
author_facet Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
author_sort Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein
title Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_short Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_full Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_fullStr Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_full_unstemmed Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
title_sort refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty
publishDate 2017
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/2/49%20ACCEPTANCE%20GHAFUR.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/5/Maritime%20Boundary%20Delimitation%20Presentation%20%28ICDR%202017%29%20%28Prof.%20Ghafur%29%202.pdf
https://icdr2017.org/
geographic Jan Mayen
geographic_facet Jan Mayen
genre Jan Mayen
genre_facet Jan Mayen
op_relation http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/2/49%20ACCEPTANCE%20GHAFUR.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/59261/5/Maritime%20Boundary%20Delimitation%20Presentation%20%28ICDR%202017%29%20%28Prof.%20Ghafur%29%202.pdf
Hamid, Abdul Ghafur@Khin Maung Sein (2017) Refining the maritime boundary delimitation approach through decisions of international courts: towards predictability and certainty. In: International Conference on Dispute Resolution (ICDR) 2017, 9th-10th August 2017, Kuala Lumpur. (Unpublished)
_version_ 1766048314599407616