Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations

A probabilistic analysis of atmospheric transport and deposition patterns from two nuclear risk sites -- Kamchatka and Vladivostok -- situated in the Russian Far East to countries and geographical regions of interest (Japan, China, North and South Koreas, territories of the Russian Far East, State o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahura, A., Baklanov, A., Sorensen, J.H., Parker, F., Novikov, V., Brown, K.G., Compton, K.L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Springer-Verlag 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/7536/
id ftiiasalaxendare:oai:pure.iiasa.ac.at:7536
record_format openpolar
spelling ftiiasalaxendare:oai:pure.iiasa.ac.at:7536 2023-05-15T15:19:21+02:00 Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations Mahura, A. Baklanov, A. Sorensen, J.H. Parker, F. Novikov, V. Brown, K.G. Compton, K.L. 2005 http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/7536/ unknown Springer-Verlag Mahura, A. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/2150.html>, Baklanov, A. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/3127.html>, Sorensen, J.H., Parker, F. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/1499.html>, Novikov, V. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/1480.html>, Brown, K.G., & Compton, K.L. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/1193.html> (2005). Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 102 (1) 261-287. 10.1007/s10661-005-0295-7 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-0295-7>. Article PeerReviewed 2005 ftiiasalaxendare 2022-04-15T12:32:04Z A probabilistic analysis of atmospheric transport and deposition patterns from two nuclear risk sites -- Kamchatka and Vladivostok -- situated in the Russian Far East to countries and geographical regions of interest (Japan, China, North and South Koreas, territories of the Russian Far East, State of Alaska, and Aleutian Chain Islands, US) was performed. The main questions addressed were the following: Which geographical territories are at the highest risk from hypothetical releases at these sites? What are the probabilities for radionuclide atmospheric transport and deposition on different neighboring countries in case of accidents at the sites? For analysis, several research tools developed within the Arctic Risk Project were applied: 1. isentropic trajectory model to calculate a multiyear dataset of 5-day forward trajectories that originated over the site locations at various altitudes; 2. DERMA long-range transport model to simulate 5-day atmospheric transport, dispersion, and deposition of ^137Cs for 1-day release (at the rate of 10^10 Bq/s); and 3. a set of statistical methods (including exploratory, cluster, and probability fields analyses) for evaluation of trajectory and dispersion modeling results. The possible impact (on annual, seasonal, and monthly basis) of selected risk sites on neighboring geographical regions is evaluated using a set of various indicators. For trajectory modeling, the indicators examined are: 1. atmospheric transport pathways, 2. airflow probability fields, 3. fast transport probability fields, 4. maximum possible impact zone, 5. maximum reaching distance, and 6. typical transport time fields. For dispersion modeling, the indicators examined are: 1. time integrated air concentration, 2. dry deposition, and 3. wet deposition. It was found for both sites that within the boundary layer the westerly flows are dominant throughout the year (more than 60% of the time), increasing with altitude of free troposphere up to 85% of the time. For the Kamchatka site, the US regions are at the highest risk with the average times of atmospheric transport ranging from 3 to 5.1 days and depositions of 10^-1 Bq/m2 and lower. For the Vladivostok site, the northern China and Japan regions are at the highest risk with the average times of atmospheric transport of 0.5 and 1.6 days, respectively, and depositions ranging from 10^0 to 10^+2 Bq/m^2. The areas of maximum potentially impacted zones are 30 x 10^4 km^2 and 25 x 10^4 km^2 for the Kamchatka and Vladivostok sites, respectively. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Kamchatka Alaska IIASA DARE (Data Repository of the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) Arctic Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection IIASA DARE (Data Repository of the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis)
op_collection_id ftiiasalaxendare
language unknown
description A probabilistic analysis of atmospheric transport and deposition patterns from two nuclear risk sites -- Kamchatka and Vladivostok -- situated in the Russian Far East to countries and geographical regions of interest (Japan, China, North and South Koreas, territories of the Russian Far East, State of Alaska, and Aleutian Chain Islands, US) was performed. The main questions addressed were the following: Which geographical territories are at the highest risk from hypothetical releases at these sites? What are the probabilities for radionuclide atmospheric transport and deposition on different neighboring countries in case of accidents at the sites? For analysis, several research tools developed within the Arctic Risk Project were applied: 1. isentropic trajectory model to calculate a multiyear dataset of 5-day forward trajectories that originated over the site locations at various altitudes; 2. DERMA long-range transport model to simulate 5-day atmospheric transport, dispersion, and deposition of ^137Cs for 1-day release (at the rate of 10^10 Bq/s); and 3. a set of statistical methods (including exploratory, cluster, and probability fields analyses) for evaluation of trajectory and dispersion modeling results. The possible impact (on annual, seasonal, and monthly basis) of selected risk sites on neighboring geographical regions is evaluated using a set of various indicators. For trajectory modeling, the indicators examined are: 1. atmospheric transport pathways, 2. airflow probability fields, 3. fast transport probability fields, 4. maximum possible impact zone, 5. maximum reaching distance, and 6. typical transport time fields. For dispersion modeling, the indicators examined are: 1. time integrated air concentration, 2. dry deposition, and 3. wet deposition. It was found for both sites that within the boundary layer the westerly flows are dominant throughout the year (more than 60% of the time), increasing with altitude of free troposphere up to 85% of the time. For the Kamchatka site, the US regions are at the highest risk with the average times of atmospheric transport ranging from 3 to 5.1 days and depositions of 10^-1 Bq/m2 and lower. For the Vladivostok site, the northern China and Japan regions are at the highest risk with the average times of atmospheric transport of 0.5 and 1.6 days, respectively, and depositions ranging from 10^0 to 10^+2 Bq/m^2. The areas of maximum potentially impacted zones are 30 x 10^4 km^2 and 25 x 10^4 km^2 for the Kamchatka and Vladivostok sites, respectively.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mahura, A.
Baklanov, A.
Sorensen, J.H.
Parker, F.
Novikov, V.
Brown, K.G.
Compton, K.L.
spellingShingle Mahura, A.
Baklanov, A.
Sorensen, J.H.
Parker, F.
Novikov, V.
Brown, K.G.
Compton, K.L.
Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations
author_facet Mahura, A.
Baklanov, A.
Sorensen, J.H.
Parker, F.
Novikov, V.
Brown, K.G.
Compton, K.L.
author_sort Mahura, A.
title Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations
title_short Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations
title_full Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations
title_fullStr Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations
title_sort assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to russian pacific fleet operations
publisher Springer-Verlag
publishDate 2005
url http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/7536/
geographic Arctic
Pacific
geographic_facet Arctic
Pacific
genre Arctic
Kamchatka
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Kamchatka
Alaska
op_relation Mahura, A. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/2150.html>, Baklanov, A. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/3127.html>, Sorensen, J.H., Parker, F. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/1499.html>, Novikov, V. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/1480.html>, Brown, K.G., & Compton, K.L. <http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/view/iiasa/1193.html> (2005). Assessment of potential atmospheric transport and deposition patterns due to Russian Pacific Fleet operations. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 102 (1) 261-287. 10.1007/s10661-005-0295-7 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-0295-7>.
_version_ 1766349527489445888