Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model

The Arctic is warming 2 to 3 times faster than the global average, partly due to changes in short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs) including aerosols. In order to study the effects of atmospheric aerosols in this warming, recent past (1990-2014) and future (2015-2050) simulations have been carried out...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Im, U., Tsigaridis, K., Faluvegi, G., Langen, P.L., French, J.P., Mahmood, R., Thomas, M.A., von Salzen, K., Thomas, D.C., Whaley, C.H., Klimont, Z., Skov, H., Brandt, J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: European Geosciences Union (EGU) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17335/
http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17335/1/acp-21-10413-2021.pdf
id ftiiasalaxendare:oai:pure.iiasa.ac.at:17335
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection IIASA DARE (Data Repository of the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis)
op_collection_id ftiiasalaxendare
language English
description The Arctic is warming 2 to 3 times faster than the global average, partly due to changes in short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs) including aerosols. In order to study the effects of atmospheric aerosols in this warming, recent past (1990-2014) and future (2015-2050) simulations have been carried out using the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model to study the aerosol burdens and their radiative and climate impacts over the Arctic (>60 N), using anthropogenic emissions from the Eclipse V6b and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) databases, while global annual mean greenhouse gas concentrations were prescribed and kept fixed in all simulations. Results showed that the simulations have underestimated observed surface aerosol levels, in particular black carbon (BC) and sulfate (SO42-), by more than 50%, with the smallest biases calculated for the atmosphere-only simulations, where winds are nudged to reanalysis data. CMIP6 simulations performed slightly better in reproducing the observed surface aerosol concentrations and climate parameters, compared to the Eclipse simulations. In addition, simulations where atmosphere and ocean are fully coupled had slightly smaller biases in aerosol levels compared to atmosphere-only simulations without nudging. Arctic BC, organic aerosol (OA), and SO42- burdens decrease significantly in all simulations by 10%-60% following the reductions of 7%-78% in emission projections, with the Eclipse ensemble showing larger reductions in Arctic aerosol burdens compared to the CMIP6 ensemble. For the 2030-2050 period, the Eclipse ensemble simulated a radiative forcing due to aerosol-radiation interactions (RFARI) of -0.39±0.01Wm-2, which is -0.08Wm-2 larger than the 1990-2010 mean forcing (-0.32Wm-2), of which -0.24±0.01Wm-2 was attributed to the anthropogenic aerosols. The CMIP6 ensemble simulated a RFARI of -0.35 to -0.40Wm-2 for the same period, which is -0.01 to -0.06Wm-2 larger than the 1990-2010 mean forcing of -0.35Wm-2. The scenarios with little to no mitigation (worst-case scenarios) led to very small changes in the RFARI, while scenarios with medium to large emission mitigations led to increases in the negative RFARI, mainly due to the decrease in the positive BC forcing and the decrease in the negative SO42- forcing. The anthropogenic aerosols accounted for -0.24 to -0.26Wm-2 of the net RFARI in 2030-2050 period, in Eclipse and CMIP6 ensembles, respectively. Finally, all simulations showed an increase in the Arctic surface air temperatures throughout the simulation period. By 2050, surface air temperatures are projected to increase by 2.4 to 2.6C in the Eclipse ensemble and 1.9 to 2.6C in the CMIP6 ensemble, compared to the 1990-2010 mean. Overall, results show that even the scenarios with largest emission reductions leads to similar impact on the future Arctic surface air temperatures and sea-ice extent compared to scenarios with smaller emission reductions, implying reductions of greenhouse emissions are still necessary to mitigate climate change.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Im, U.
Tsigaridis, K.
Faluvegi, G.
Langen, P.L.
French, J.P.
Mahmood, R.
Thomas, M.A.
von Salzen, K.
Thomas, D.C.
Whaley, C.H.
Klimont, Z.
Skov, H.
Brandt, J.
spellingShingle Im, U.
Tsigaridis, K.
Faluvegi, G.
Langen, P.L.
French, J.P.
Mahmood, R.
Thomas, M.A.
von Salzen, K.
Thomas, D.C.
Whaley, C.H.
Klimont, Z.
Skov, H.
Brandt, J.
Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model
author_facet Im, U.
Tsigaridis, K.
Faluvegi, G.
Langen, P.L.
French, J.P.
Mahmood, R.
Thomas, M.A.
von Salzen, K.
Thomas, D.C.
Whaley, C.H.
Klimont, Z.
Skov, H.
Brandt, J.
author_sort Im, U.
title Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model
title_short Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model
title_full Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model
title_fullStr Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model
title_full_unstemmed Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model
title_sort present and future aerosol impacts on arctic climate change in the giss-e2.1 earth system model
publisher European Geosciences Union (EGU)
publishDate 2021
url http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17335/
http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17335/1/acp-21-10413-2021.pdf
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic
black carbon
Climate change
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
black carbon
Climate change
Sea ice
op_relation http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17335/1/acp-21-10413-2021.pdf
Im, U., Tsigaridis, K., Faluvegi, G., Langen, P.L., French, J.P., Mahmood, R., Thomas, M.A., von Salzen, K., et al. (2021). Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 21 (13) 10413-10438. 10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021 <https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021>.
op_rights cc_by_4
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 21
container_issue 13
container_start_page 10413
op_container_end_page 10438
_version_ 1766300562141216768
spelling ftiiasalaxendare:oai:pure.iiasa.ac.at:17335 2023-05-15T14:27:00+02:00 Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model Im, U. Tsigaridis, K. Faluvegi, G. Langen, P.L. French, J.P. Mahmood, R. Thomas, M.A. von Salzen, K. Thomas, D.C. Whaley, C.H. Klimont, Z. Skov, H. Brandt, J. 2021-07-09 text http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17335/ http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17335/1/acp-21-10413-2021.pdf en eng European Geosciences Union (EGU) http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/17335/1/acp-21-10413-2021.pdf Im, U., Tsigaridis, K., Faluvegi, G., Langen, P.L., French, J.P., Mahmood, R., Thomas, M.A., von Salzen, K., et al. (2021). Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 21 (13) 10413-10438. 10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021 <https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021>. cc_by_4 CC-BY Article PeerReviewed 2021 ftiiasalaxendare https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021 2022-04-15T12:39:49Z The Arctic is warming 2 to 3 times faster than the global average, partly due to changes in short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs) including aerosols. In order to study the effects of atmospheric aerosols in this warming, recent past (1990-2014) and future (2015-2050) simulations have been carried out using the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model to study the aerosol burdens and their radiative and climate impacts over the Arctic (>60 N), using anthropogenic emissions from the Eclipse V6b and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) databases, while global annual mean greenhouse gas concentrations were prescribed and kept fixed in all simulations. Results showed that the simulations have underestimated observed surface aerosol levels, in particular black carbon (BC) and sulfate (SO42-), by more than 50%, with the smallest biases calculated for the atmosphere-only simulations, where winds are nudged to reanalysis data. CMIP6 simulations performed slightly better in reproducing the observed surface aerosol concentrations and climate parameters, compared to the Eclipse simulations. In addition, simulations where atmosphere and ocean are fully coupled had slightly smaller biases in aerosol levels compared to atmosphere-only simulations without nudging. Arctic BC, organic aerosol (OA), and SO42- burdens decrease significantly in all simulations by 10%-60% following the reductions of 7%-78% in emission projections, with the Eclipse ensemble showing larger reductions in Arctic aerosol burdens compared to the CMIP6 ensemble. For the 2030-2050 period, the Eclipse ensemble simulated a radiative forcing due to aerosol-radiation interactions (RFARI) of -0.39±0.01Wm-2, which is -0.08Wm-2 larger than the 1990-2010 mean forcing (-0.32Wm-2), of which -0.24±0.01Wm-2 was attributed to the anthropogenic aerosols. The CMIP6 ensemble simulated a RFARI of -0.35 to -0.40Wm-2 for the same period, which is -0.01 to -0.06Wm-2 larger than the 1990-2010 mean forcing of -0.35Wm-2. The scenarios with little to no mitigation (worst-case scenarios) led to very small changes in the RFARI, while scenarios with medium to large emission mitigations led to increases in the negative RFARI, mainly due to the decrease in the positive BC forcing and the decrease in the negative SO42- forcing. The anthropogenic aerosols accounted for -0.24 to -0.26Wm-2 of the net RFARI in 2030-2050 period, in Eclipse and CMIP6 ensembles, respectively. Finally, all simulations showed an increase in the Arctic surface air temperatures throughout the simulation period. By 2050, surface air temperatures are projected to increase by 2.4 to 2.6C in the Eclipse ensemble and 1.9 to 2.6C in the CMIP6 ensemble, compared to the 1990-2010 mean. Overall, results show that even the scenarios with largest emission reductions leads to similar impact on the future Arctic surface air temperatures and sea-ice extent compared to scenarios with smaller emission reductions, implying reductions of greenhouse emissions are still necessary to mitigate climate change. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic black carbon Climate change Sea ice IIASA DARE (Data Repository of the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) Arctic Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 21 13 10413 10438