Corrigendum: Resolving the abundance and air-sea fluxes of airborne microorganisms in the North Atlantic Ocean

• Published in: Frontiers in Microbiology
• Main Authors: Yahya, Razan Z., Arrieta, J.M. (Jesús María), Cusack, Michael, Duarte, C.M. (Carlos Manuel)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media SA 2017
• Subjects: Andreas; Blanchard; Duarte; Jiménez; North Atlantic
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10508/14837; https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01971

A corrigendum on Resolving the abundance and air-sea fluxes of airborne microorganisms in the North Atlantic Ocean by Mayol, E., Jiménez, M. A., Herndl, G. J., Duarte, C. M., and Arrieta, J. M. (2014). Front. Microbiol. 5:557. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00557 We found an implementation error in the calculation of the deposition velocity (vd) which, in turn, affected all the estimated vd-depending parameters (deposition flux, residence time, and traveled distance by microorganisms). Deposition fluxes are now somewhat lower than previously estimated, resulting in residence times and traveled distances longer than those previously estimated. In addition, the spray fluxes were calculated using a spray generation function (dF/dr0) valid for droplets of radii between 0.5 and 12 μm proposed by Blanchard (1963) and Gathman (1982) as corrected by Andreas et al. (1995). However, in the calculation of dF/dr0, we exceeded this valid range of radii given that we included droplets with radii from 0.2 μm according to the small size of some microbial cells. Thus, a different formulation of dF/dr0, developed by Gong (2003), is now used for the estimation of spray fluxes of microbes, which is valid even for small droplets from a radius of 0.07 μm. Below, we offer a new corrected version of the paragraphs affected by corrections along the text. In addition, we show corrected versions of Figure 1 (forward trajectories according residence times), Figure 3 (deposition velocity values), Figure 5 (spray and deposition fluxes), Figure 6 (Net fluxes), and Table 1. The authors apologize for the errors in the estimates reported in the original manuscript. These corrections only affect the magnitude of some of the reported variables and even though they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article they are reported here for accuracy and reproducibility.