Food ?Security? in? Iceland

The concept of food security applies in both poor and rich societies and concerns the steady availability of food in the right quantity and quality, at the right price. Globally, policies to assure it remain confused and world food prices are rising. Despite large exports of fish, Iceland produces o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bailes, Alyson J.K., Jóhannsson, Orri
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Stjórnsýslustofnun 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.hi.is/index.php/irpa/article/view/b.2011.7.2.1
id fticelandunivojs:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1152
record_format openpolar
spelling fticelandunivojs:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1152 2023-08-20T04:07:23+02:00 Food ?Security? in? Iceland Bailes, Alyson J.K. Jóhannsson, Orri 2011-12-15 application/pdf https://ojs.hi.is/index.php/irpa/article/view/b.2011.7.2.1 eng eng Stjórnsýslustofnun https://ojs.hi.is/index.php/irpa/article/view/b.2011.7.2.1/pdf_217 https://ojs.hi.is/index.php/irpa/article/view/b.2011.7.2.1 Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2011) Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla; Bnd. 7 Nr. 2 (2011) 1670-679X 1670-6803 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articles and speeches 2011 fticelandunivojs 2023-08-01T12:28:51Z The concept of food security applies in both poor and rich societies and concerns the steady availability of food in the right quantity and quality, at the right price. Globally, policies to assure it remain confused and world food prices are rising. Despite large exports of fish, Iceland produces only around half of its inhabitants’ nutritional needs and relies significantly on imports, also for food production inputs like fodder and seeds. Icelandic supplies are affected by oligopoly in the retail market, and could be put at risk by events in other security dimensions ranging from natural disasters and infrastructure failures to terrorism, neighbouring conflicts and other people’s shortages. Icelandic farmers have used the terminology of ‘food security’ to press their claims for more home-grown production, and more recently also in their campaign against EU membership. The general public however shows little sign of security-awareness in this field. The government possesses suitable non-military security frameworks to address food-related risks and has initiated useful, general and specific, studies. Yet it has not developed a strategy or contingency plan for food security, even following the lessons of the 2008 economic crash and 2010-2011 eruptions. Suitable remedies would include larger emergency stocks and a range of measures to reduce vulnerability and improve resilience in crises. Above all, Iceland needs a balanced and open policy-making process to decide what its general future strategy should be as a food-producing and -importing nation. Food security could then be more precisely defined and pursued with the aim of minimizing threats and risks to that agreed vision. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland University of Iceland: Peer Reviewed Journals
institution Open Polar
collection University of Iceland: Peer Reviewed Journals
op_collection_id fticelandunivojs
language English
description The concept of food security applies in both poor and rich societies and concerns the steady availability of food in the right quantity and quality, at the right price. Globally, policies to assure it remain confused and world food prices are rising. Despite large exports of fish, Iceland produces only around half of its inhabitants’ nutritional needs and relies significantly on imports, also for food production inputs like fodder and seeds. Icelandic supplies are affected by oligopoly in the retail market, and could be put at risk by events in other security dimensions ranging from natural disasters and infrastructure failures to terrorism, neighbouring conflicts and other people’s shortages. Icelandic farmers have used the terminology of ‘food security’ to press their claims for more home-grown production, and more recently also in their campaign against EU membership. The general public however shows little sign of security-awareness in this field. The government possesses suitable non-military security frameworks to address food-related risks and has initiated useful, general and specific, studies. Yet it has not developed a strategy or contingency plan for food security, even following the lessons of the 2008 economic crash and 2010-2011 eruptions. Suitable remedies would include larger emergency stocks and a range of measures to reduce vulnerability and improve resilience in crises. Above all, Iceland needs a balanced and open policy-making process to decide what its general future strategy should be as a food-producing and -importing nation. Food security could then be more precisely defined and pursued with the aim of minimizing threats and risks to that agreed vision.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bailes, Alyson J.K.
Jóhannsson, Orri
spellingShingle Bailes, Alyson J.K.
Jóhannsson, Orri
Food ?Security? in? Iceland
author_facet Bailes, Alyson J.K.
Jóhannsson, Orri
author_sort Bailes, Alyson J.K.
title Food ?Security? in? Iceland
title_short Food ?Security? in? Iceland
title_full Food ?Security? in? Iceland
title_fullStr Food ?Security? in? Iceland
title_full_unstemmed Food ?Security? in? Iceland
title_sort food ?security? in? iceland
publisher Stjórnsýslustofnun
publishDate 2011
url https://ojs.hi.is/index.php/irpa/article/view/b.2011.7.2.1
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2011)
Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla; Bnd. 7 Nr. 2 (2011)
1670-679X
1670-6803
op_relation https://ojs.hi.is/index.php/irpa/article/view/b.2011.7.2.1/pdf_217
https://ojs.hi.is/index.php/irpa/article/view/b.2011.7.2.1
_version_ 1774718971208007680