Too late, too vague, too soft: How and why the idea of the first point of contact in the Icelandic health care system has failed
This research is about ideas, interests and institutions in health care in Iceland. It describes how the idea of primary care centres as the first point of patients´ contact in health care, on one hand, and the idea of patients´ freedom to choose where to seek medical care, on the other, have been t...
Published in: | Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Icelandic |
Published: |
Stjórnsýslustofnun
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.irpa.is/article/view/3086 https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2015.11.2.3 |
id |
fticelandunivojs:oai:ojs.hi.is:article/3086 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fticelandunivojs:oai:ojs.hi.is:article/3086 2023-05-15T16:53:03+02:00 Too late, too vague, too soft: How and why the idea of the first point of contact in the Icelandic health care system has failed Of seint, óljóst og veikt: Hvernig og hvers vegna hugmyndin um fyrsta viðkomustaðinn í heilbrigðiskerfinu hefur misst marks Sigurgeirsdóttir, Sigurbjörg 2015-12-15 application/pdf http://www.irpa.is/article/view/3086 https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2015.11.2.3 isl ice Stjórnsýslustofnun http://www.irpa.is/article/view/3086/pdf http://www.irpa.is/article/view/3086 doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2015.11.2.3 ##submission.copyrightStatement## Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration; Árg. 11, Nr 2 (2015); 161-186 Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla; Árg. 11, Nr 2 (2015); 161-186 1670-679X 1670-6803 Health care system public policy policy change implementation politics of health care Opinber stefnumótun stefnubreytingar stefnu innleiðing heilbrigðiskerfi; stjórnmál heilbrigðismála. info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2015 fticelandunivojs https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2015.11.2.3 2022-09-21T13:39:02Z This research is about ideas, interests and institutions in health care in Iceland. It describes how the idea of primary care centres as the first point of patients´ contact in health care, on one hand, and the idea of patients´ freedom to choose where to seek medical care, on the other, have been the competing views shaping the system for almost fifty years. The research seeks to shed lights on why the authorities have not succeeded in making primary care become the first point of contact in health care. It aims to create a better understanding about why and how such a gap between objectives and outcomes in public policy emerges. This study draws on published and unpublished findings from the author´s earlier research on the Icelandic health care system, and interviews with medical doctors, civil servants and politicians. Theories on policy implementation are applied in order to bring out a theoretical perspective on government´s policy implementation. Furthermore, the research brings out how issues in health care reach government´s agenda and why government´s attempts at change do sometimes succeed, but most often don´t. It concludes that better access to primary care services emphasized by the early 1970s legislation was first and foremost aimed at people living outside the two main urban areas. On the other hand, the idea of patients´ first point of contact as a goal of government policy emerged too late, its aim and implementation was too ambiguous and the tool of government applied too weak. Þessi rannsókn snýst um hugmyndir og hagsmuni í heilbrigðisþjónustu á Íslandi. Rannsóknin lýsir því hvernig annars vegar hugmyndin um heilsugæsluna sem fyrsta viðkomustað sjúklinga í heilbrigðiskerfinu og hugmyndin um það að sjúklingar eigi að hafa nokkurt val um það hvert þeir sæki þjónustu innan kerfisins hafa tekist á við mótun kerfisins í hart nær hálfa öld. Leitast er við að varpa ljósi á þá spurningu hvers vegna stjórnvöldum hefur ekki tekist að ná því markmiði að heilsugæslan verði að jafnaði fyrsti ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland University of Iceland: Peer Reviewed Journals Varpa ENVELOPE(11.284,11.284,64.505,64.505) Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla 11 2 161 186 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Iceland: Peer Reviewed Journals |
op_collection_id |
fticelandunivojs |
language |
Icelandic |
topic |
Health care system public policy policy change implementation politics of health care Opinber stefnumótun stefnubreytingar stefnu innleiðing heilbrigðiskerfi; stjórnmál heilbrigðismála. |
spellingShingle |
Health care system public policy policy change implementation politics of health care Opinber stefnumótun stefnubreytingar stefnu innleiðing heilbrigðiskerfi; stjórnmál heilbrigðismála. Sigurgeirsdóttir, Sigurbjörg Too late, too vague, too soft: How and why the idea of the first point of contact in the Icelandic health care system has failed |
topic_facet |
Health care system public policy policy change implementation politics of health care Opinber stefnumótun stefnubreytingar stefnu innleiðing heilbrigðiskerfi; stjórnmál heilbrigðismála. |
description |
This research is about ideas, interests and institutions in health care in Iceland. It describes how the idea of primary care centres as the first point of patients´ contact in health care, on one hand, and the idea of patients´ freedom to choose where to seek medical care, on the other, have been the competing views shaping the system for almost fifty years. The research seeks to shed lights on why the authorities have not succeeded in making primary care become the first point of contact in health care. It aims to create a better understanding about why and how such a gap between objectives and outcomes in public policy emerges. This study draws on published and unpublished findings from the author´s earlier research on the Icelandic health care system, and interviews with medical doctors, civil servants and politicians. Theories on policy implementation are applied in order to bring out a theoretical perspective on government´s policy implementation. Furthermore, the research brings out how issues in health care reach government´s agenda and why government´s attempts at change do sometimes succeed, but most often don´t. It concludes that better access to primary care services emphasized by the early 1970s legislation was first and foremost aimed at people living outside the two main urban areas. On the other hand, the idea of patients´ first point of contact as a goal of government policy emerged too late, its aim and implementation was too ambiguous and the tool of government applied too weak. Þessi rannsókn snýst um hugmyndir og hagsmuni í heilbrigðisþjónustu á Íslandi. Rannsóknin lýsir því hvernig annars vegar hugmyndin um heilsugæsluna sem fyrsta viðkomustað sjúklinga í heilbrigðiskerfinu og hugmyndin um það að sjúklingar eigi að hafa nokkurt val um það hvert þeir sæki þjónustu innan kerfisins hafa tekist á við mótun kerfisins í hart nær hálfa öld. Leitast er við að varpa ljósi á þá spurningu hvers vegna stjórnvöldum hefur ekki tekist að ná því markmiði að heilsugæslan verði að jafnaði fyrsti ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Sigurgeirsdóttir, Sigurbjörg |
author_facet |
Sigurgeirsdóttir, Sigurbjörg |
author_sort |
Sigurgeirsdóttir, Sigurbjörg |
title |
Too late, too vague, too soft: How and why the idea of the first point of contact in the Icelandic health care system has failed |
title_short |
Too late, too vague, too soft: How and why the idea of the first point of contact in the Icelandic health care system has failed |
title_full |
Too late, too vague, too soft: How and why the idea of the first point of contact in the Icelandic health care system has failed |
title_fullStr |
Too late, too vague, too soft: How and why the idea of the first point of contact in the Icelandic health care system has failed |
title_full_unstemmed |
Too late, too vague, too soft: How and why the idea of the first point of contact in the Icelandic health care system has failed |
title_sort |
too late, too vague, too soft: how and why the idea of the first point of contact in the icelandic health care system has failed |
publisher |
Stjórnsýslustofnun |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://www.irpa.is/article/view/3086 https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2015.11.2.3 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(11.284,11.284,64.505,64.505) |
geographic |
Varpa |
geographic_facet |
Varpa |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration; Árg. 11, Nr 2 (2015); 161-186 Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla; Árg. 11, Nr 2 (2015); 161-186 1670-679X 1670-6803 |
op_relation |
http://www.irpa.is/article/view/3086/pdf http://www.irpa.is/article/view/3086 doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2015.11.2.3 |
op_rights |
##submission.copyrightStatement## |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2015.11.2.3 |
container_title |
Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla |
container_volume |
11 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
161 |
op_container_end_page |
186 |
_version_ |
1766043574941515776 |