The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?

Apart from the question of whether permanent exemptions from EU rules could be achieved in Iceland’s (by now halted) EU accession negotiations, the EU’s institutional development in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty has been used as a key argument for the conservative government to first suspend the neg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla
Main Author: Conrad, Maximilian
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Stjórnsýslustofnun 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3
https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
_version_ 1821554247198572544
author Conrad, Maximilian
author_facet Conrad, Maximilian
author_sort Conrad, Maximilian
collection University of Iceland: Peer Reviewed Journals
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla
container_volume 10
description Apart from the question of whether permanent exemptions from EU rules could be achieved in Iceland’s (by now halted) EU accession negotiations, the EU’s institutional development in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty has been used as a key argument for the conservative government to first suspend the negotiations and subsequently also to propose to withdraw the membership application altogether. In this regard, concerns about the democratic quality of EU decision making play a key role. However, as this article argues, the institutional development of the EU since Lisbon, particularly in relation to democratic governance, has been considerably more subtle than it is claimed to be and has to be seen as a continuation of a much longer process. More importantly, however, the debate leaves pressing questions about the nature of the EU as a polity unaddressed. In this context, this article addresses the question of what kind of democracy is possible in the kind of polity sui generis that the EU undoubtedly is.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
id fticelandunivojs:oai:ojs.hi.is:article/1321
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id fticelandunivojs
op_doi https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
op_relation http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3/pdf
http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3
doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
op_source Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration; Árg. 10, Nr 1 (2014); 31-50
Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla; Árg. 10, Nr 1 (2014); 31-50
1670-679X
1670-6803
publishDate 2014
publisher Stjórnsýslustofnun
record_format openpolar
spelling fticelandunivojs:oai:ojs.hi.is:article/1321 2025-01-16T22:37:28+00:00 The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland? Conrad, Maximilian 2014-06-15 application/pdf http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3 https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3 eng eng Stjórnsýslustofnun http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3/pdf http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3 doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3 Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration; Árg. 10, Nr 1 (2014); 31-50 Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla; Árg. 10, Nr 1 (2014); 31-50 1670-679X 1670-6803 European Union Lisbon Treaty institutional reform democratic deficit info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2014 fticelandunivojs https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3 2022-09-21T13:38:43Z Apart from the question of whether permanent exemptions from EU rules could be achieved in Iceland’s (by now halted) EU accession negotiations, the EU’s institutional development in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty has been used as a key argument for the conservative government to first suspend the negotiations and subsequently also to propose to withdraw the membership application altogether. In this regard, concerns about the democratic quality of EU decision making play a key role. However, as this article argues, the institutional development of the EU since Lisbon, particularly in relation to democratic governance, has been considerably more subtle than it is claimed to be and has to be seen as a continuation of a much longer process. More importantly, however, the debate leaves pressing questions about the nature of the EU as a polity unaddressed. In this context, this article addresses the question of what kind of democracy is possible in the kind of polity sui generis that the EU undoubtedly is. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland University of Iceland: Peer Reviewed Journals Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla 10 1 31
spellingShingle European Union
Lisbon Treaty
institutional reform
democratic deficit
Conrad, Maximilian
The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_full The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_fullStr The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_full_unstemmed The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_short The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_sort eu’s post-lisbon democratic development: what lessons for iceland?
topic European Union
Lisbon Treaty
institutional reform
democratic deficit
topic_facet European Union
Lisbon Treaty
institutional reform
democratic deficit
url http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3
https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3