The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?

Apart from the question of whether permanent exemptions from EU rules could be achieved in Iceland’s (by now halted) EU accession negotiations, the EU’s institutional development in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty has been used as a key argument for the conservative government to first suspend the neg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla
Main Author: Conrad, Maximilian
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Stjórnsýslustofnun 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3
https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
id fticelandunivojs:oai:ojs.hi.is:article/1321
record_format openpolar
spelling fticelandunivojs:oai:ojs.hi.is:article/1321 2023-05-15T16:49:57+02:00 The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland? Conrad, Maximilian 2014-06-15 application/pdf http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3 https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3 eng eng Stjórnsýslustofnun http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3/pdf http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3 doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3 Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration; Árg. 10, Nr 1 (2014); 31-50 Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla; Árg. 10, Nr 1 (2014); 31-50 1670-679X 1670-6803 European Union Lisbon Treaty institutional reform democratic deficit info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2014 fticelandunivojs https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3 2022-09-21T13:38:43Z Apart from the question of whether permanent exemptions from EU rules could be achieved in Iceland’s (by now halted) EU accession negotiations, the EU’s institutional development in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty has been used as a key argument for the conservative government to first suspend the negotiations and subsequently also to propose to withdraw the membership application altogether. In this regard, concerns about the democratic quality of EU decision making play a key role. However, as this article argues, the institutional development of the EU since Lisbon, particularly in relation to democratic governance, has been considerably more subtle than it is claimed to be and has to be seen as a continuation of a much longer process. More importantly, however, the debate leaves pressing questions about the nature of the EU as a polity unaddressed. In this context, this article addresses the question of what kind of democracy is possible in the kind of polity sui generis that the EU undoubtedly is. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland University of Iceland: Peer Reviewed Journals Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla 10 1 31
institution Open Polar
collection University of Iceland: Peer Reviewed Journals
op_collection_id fticelandunivojs
language English
topic European Union
Lisbon Treaty
institutional reform
democratic deficit
spellingShingle European Union
Lisbon Treaty
institutional reform
democratic deficit
Conrad, Maximilian
The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
topic_facet European Union
Lisbon Treaty
institutional reform
democratic deficit
description Apart from the question of whether permanent exemptions from EU rules could be achieved in Iceland’s (by now halted) EU accession negotiations, the EU’s institutional development in the wake of the Lisbon Treaty has been used as a key argument for the conservative government to first suspend the negotiations and subsequently also to propose to withdraw the membership application altogether. In this regard, concerns about the democratic quality of EU decision making play a key role. However, as this article argues, the institutional development of the EU since Lisbon, particularly in relation to democratic governance, has been considerably more subtle than it is claimed to be and has to be seen as a continuation of a much longer process. More importantly, however, the debate leaves pressing questions about the nature of the EU as a polity unaddressed. In this context, this article addresses the question of what kind of democracy is possible in the kind of polity sui generis that the EU undoubtedly is.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Conrad, Maximilian
author_facet Conrad, Maximilian
author_sort Conrad, Maximilian
title The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_short The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_full The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_fullStr The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_full_unstemmed The EU’s Post-Lisbon Democratic Development: What Lessons for Iceland?
title_sort eu’s post-lisbon democratic development: what lessons for iceland?
publisher Stjórnsýslustofnun
publishDate 2014
url http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3
https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration; Árg. 10, Nr 1 (2014); 31-50
Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla; Árg. 10, Nr 1 (2014); 31-50
1670-679X
1670-6803
op_relation http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3/pdf
http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.3
doi:10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
op_doi https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2014.10.1.3
container_title Veftímaritið Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla
container_volume 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
_version_ 1766040120988794880