The carbon budget of a tundra in the north-eastern Russian Arctic during the snow free season and its stability in the 2003-2016 period

Large quantities of carbon are stored in the terrestrial permafrost of the Arctic region where the rate of climate warming is two to three times more than the global mean and the largest temperature anomalies observed in autumn and winter. The quantification of the impact of climate warming on the d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dolman, H., van Huissteden, J., Dean, J., Maximov, T., Petrov, R., Belelli Marchesini, L.
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10449/65220
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19337
https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-19337.html
_version_ 1821824154194673664
author Dolman, H.
van Huissteden, J.
Dean, J.
Maximov, T.
Petrov, R.
Belelli Marchesini, L.
author2 Dolman, H.
van Huissteden, J.
Dean, J.
Maximov, T.
Petrov, R.
Belelli Marchesini, L.
author_facet Dolman, H.
van Huissteden, J.
Dean, J.
Maximov, T.
Petrov, R.
Belelli Marchesini, L.
author_sort Dolman, H.
collection Fondazione Edmund Mach: IRIS-OpenPub
description Large quantities of carbon are stored in the terrestrial permafrost of the Arctic region where the rate of climate warming is two to three times more than the global mean and the largest temperature anomalies observed in autumn and winter. The quantification of the impact of climate warming on the degradation of permafrost and the associated potential release to the atmosphere of carbon stocked in the soil in the form of greenhouse gases, thus further increasing the radiative forcing of the atmosphere, is a research priority in the field of biogeosciences. Land-atmosphere turbulent fluxes of CO2 and CH4 have been monitored at the tundra site of Kytalyk in north-eastern Siberia (70,82 N; 147.48 E) by means of eddy covariance since 2003 and 2008, respectively; regular measurement campaigns have been carried out since then. Here we present results of the seasonal CO2 budget of the tundra ecosystem for the 2003-2016 period based on observations encompassing the permafrost thawing season and analyze the inter-annual differences in the seasonal patterns of CO2 fluxes considering the separate the contribution of climatic drivers and ecosystem functional parameters relative to the processes of respiration and photosynthesis. The variability of the CO2 budget is also discussed in view of the impact of the timing and length of the snow free period. The Kytalyk tundra acted as an atmospheric carbon dioxide sink with relatively small inter-annual variability (-96.1±11.9 gC m-2) during the snow free season and the seasonal CO2 budget did not show any trend over time. The pronounced meteorological variability characterizing Arctic summers was a key factor in shaping the length of the carbon uptake period, which did not progressively increased despite its tendency to start earlier, and in determining the magnitude of CO2 fluxes. No clear evidence of inter-annual changes in the eco-physiological response parameters of CO2 fluxes to climatic drivers (global radiation and air temperature) was found along the course of the ...
format Conference Object
genre Arctic
permafrost
Tundra
Siberia
genre_facet Arctic
permafrost
Tundra
Siberia
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftiasma:oai:openpub.fmach.it:10449/65220
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftiasma
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19337
op_relation ispartofbook:EGU General Assembly 2020, online, 4-8 May 2020
EGU General Assembly 2020
http://hdl.handle.net/10449/65220
doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19337
https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-19337.html
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
publishDate 2020
record_format openpolar
spelling ftiasma:oai:openpub.fmach.it:10449/65220 2025-01-16T20:29:09+00:00 The carbon budget of a tundra in the north-eastern Russian Arctic during the snow free season and its stability in the 2003-2016 period Dolman, H. van Huissteden, J. Dean, J. Maximov, T. Petrov, R. Belelli Marchesini, L. Dolman, H. van Huissteden, J. Dean, J. Maximov, T. Petrov, R. Belelli Marchesini, L. 2020 http://hdl.handle.net/10449/65220 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19337 https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-19337.html eng eng ispartofbook:EGU General Assembly 2020, online, 4-8 May 2020 EGU General Assembly 2020 http://hdl.handle.net/10449/65220 doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19337 https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-19337.html info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Settore AGR/05 - ASSESTAMENTO FORESTALE E SELVICOLTURA info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2020 ftiasma https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19337 2023-10-24T22:24:01Z Large quantities of carbon are stored in the terrestrial permafrost of the Arctic region where the rate of climate warming is two to three times more than the global mean and the largest temperature anomalies observed in autumn and winter. The quantification of the impact of climate warming on the degradation of permafrost and the associated potential release to the atmosphere of carbon stocked in the soil in the form of greenhouse gases, thus further increasing the radiative forcing of the atmosphere, is a research priority in the field of biogeosciences. Land-atmosphere turbulent fluxes of CO2 and CH4 have been monitored at the tundra site of Kytalyk in north-eastern Siberia (70,82 N; 147.48 E) by means of eddy covariance since 2003 and 2008, respectively; regular measurement campaigns have been carried out since then. Here we present results of the seasonal CO2 budget of the tundra ecosystem for the 2003-2016 period based on observations encompassing the permafrost thawing season and analyze the inter-annual differences in the seasonal patterns of CO2 fluxes considering the separate the contribution of climatic drivers and ecosystem functional parameters relative to the processes of respiration and photosynthesis. The variability of the CO2 budget is also discussed in view of the impact of the timing and length of the snow free period. The Kytalyk tundra acted as an atmospheric carbon dioxide sink with relatively small inter-annual variability (-96.1±11.9 gC m-2) during the snow free season and the seasonal CO2 budget did not show any trend over time. The pronounced meteorological variability characterizing Arctic summers was a key factor in shaping the length of the carbon uptake period, which did not progressively increased despite its tendency to start earlier, and in determining the magnitude of CO2 fluxes. No clear evidence of inter-annual changes in the eco-physiological response parameters of CO2 fluxes to climatic drivers (global radiation and air temperature) was found along the course of the ... Conference Object Arctic permafrost Tundra Siberia Fondazione Edmund Mach: IRIS-OpenPub Arctic
spellingShingle Settore AGR/05 - ASSESTAMENTO FORESTALE E SELVICOLTURA
Dolman, H.
van Huissteden, J.
Dean, J.
Maximov, T.
Petrov, R.
Belelli Marchesini, L.
The carbon budget of a tundra in the north-eastern Russian Arctic during the snow free season and its stability in the 2003-2016 period
title The carbon budget of a tundra in the north-eastern Russian Arctic during the snow free season and its stability in the 2003-2016 period
title_full The carbon budget of a tundra in the north-eastern Russian Arctic during the snow free season and its stability in the 2003-2016 period
title_fullStr The carbon budget of a tundra in the north-eastern Russian Arctic during the snow free season and its stability in the 2003-2016 period
title_full_unstemmed The carbon budget of a tundra in the north-eastern Russian Arctic during the snow free season and its stability in the 2003-2016 period
title_short The carbon budget of a tundra in the north-eastern Russian Arctic during the snow free season and its stability in the 2003-2016 period
title_sort carbon budget of a tundra in the north-eastern russian arctic during the snow free season and its stability in the 2003-2016 period
topic Settore AGR/05 - ASSESTAMENTO FORESTALE E SELVICOLTURA
topic_facet Settore AGR/05 - ASSESTAMENTO FORESTALE E SELVICOLTURA
url http://hdl.handle.net/10449/65220
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19337
https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-19337.html