Realized habitat selection and space use by brown bears reintroduced to the Italian Alps

• Main Authors: Peters, Wibke Erika Brigitta, Cagnacci, Francesca, Cavedon, M., Mustoni, A., Zibordi, F., Groff, C., Giovannini, G.
• Other Authors: Peters, W.E.B., Cagnacci, F.
• Format: Conference Object
• Language: English
• Published: 2013
• Subjects: Carnivore conservation; Resource selection function; Least-cost path analysis; Settore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA; Ursus arctos
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/27800

Reintroductions are often difficult and can result in increased dispersal and mortality of released animals. Especially landscape fragmentation poses a challenge to conservation biologists and wildlife managers. Connecting habitat patches that support occupancy is key to ensuring long-term population recovery for umbrella species such as brown bears (Ursus arctos). In 1999 the reintroduction project ‘Life Ursus’ was initiated and 10 brown bears were translocated from Slovenia to the Eastern Italian Alps (Adamello-Brenta) where the bear population was considered extirpated by the end of the 20th century. Here, we describe the habitat selection and space use patterns of reintroduced brown bears in Trentino, Italy, with the ultimate goal of identifying corridors between preferred habitat patches. We built annual resource selection functions (RSF) using generalized linear mixed-effects models with data from 6 bears fitted with GPS collars between 2006 and 2012 at the landscape and home-range scales. Then, integrating habitat selection, movement and landscape features we employed least cost path (LCP) analyses to empirically define regional movement corridors. Finally, we used Kappa-statistics to compare the realized habitat selection at the landscape scale with a habitat suitability model (HSM) developed to predict potential habitat prior to reintroduction. At the landscape scale bears selected home-ranges at intermediate elevations in steep terrain. Habitat selection inversely correlated with road occurrence and human use landcover types, i.e. settlements, pastures and agricultural lands. Bears selected landcover types that provide forage, such as shrublands, deciduous forests, but also orchards. Within their home-ranges bears also avoided landcover types related to human use (especially bike trails, settlements and pastures). K-fold cross-validation indicated a high predictive capacity of our RSFs. We identified road crossings of movement corridors between preferred habitat patches throughout the study area; with ...