Area-based initiatives and urban democracy

Area-based initiatives (ABIs) set out to improve livability and living conditions in disadvantaged urban neigh- borhoods by making use of extensive citizen participation. ABIs are often criticized for constituting a form of undemocratic tokenism; this creates the illusion that residents have a say o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cities
Main Authors: Hovik, Sissel, Legard, Sveinung, Bertelsen, Inger Miriam
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3109814
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104638
id fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:11250/3109814
record_format openpolar
spelling fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:11250/3109814 2024-02-04T10:00:58+01:00 Area-based initiatives and urban democracy Hovik, Sissel Legard, Sveinung Bertelsen, Inger Miriam 2024-01-03T10:51:12Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3109814 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104638 eng eng Norges forskningsråd: 281131. Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning. 2023, 144 (Jan 2024), . urn:issn:0264-2751 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3109814 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104638 cristin:2219691 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning 144 Jan 2024 8 Peer reviewed Journal article 2024 fthsosloakersoda https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104638 2024-01-10T23:40:34Z Area-based initiatives (ABIs) set out to improve livability and living conditions in disadvantaged urban neigh- borhoods by making use of extensive citizen participation. ABIs are often criticized for constituting a form of undemocratic tokenism; this creates the illusion that residents have a say over urban development because citizens are only given consultative power. This paper takes a different perspective. We follow the ‘systemic turn’ in democratic theory, which addresses how direct citizen participation can reduce problems of inclusion, communication, and collective action created by defects in representative democracy. We find evidence that our case, the Grønland-Tøyen ABI in Oslo, Norway, at its best, is able to include new, previously marginalized groups in formulating a collective will that eventually impact city government policy. We argue that these cases show the potential of ABIs to enhance government effectiveness, as the participatory process creates preferable so- lutions to those produced by city experts. We also argue that it is the narrow scope of the participation schemes, rather than the lack of power devolved to citizens, that limits the ABIs contribution to urban democracy. This hinders the ABI's ability to address social justice and puts the legitimacy of the participatory arrangements at risk. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Grønland OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive) Norway Cities 144 104638
institution Open Polar
collection OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive)
op_collection_id fthsosloakersoda
language English
description Area-based initiatives (ABIs) set out to improve livability and living conditions in disadvantaged urban neigh- borhoods by making use of extensive citizen participation. ABIs are often criticized for constituting a form of undemocratic tokenism; this creates the illusion that residents have a say over urban development because citizens are only given consultative power. This paper takes a different perspective. We follow the ‘systemic turn’ in democratic theory, which addresses how direct citizen participation can reduce problems of inclusion, communication, and collective action created by defects in representative democracy. We find evidence that our case, the Grønland-Tøyen ABI in Oslo, Norway, at its best, is able to include new, previously marginalized groups in formulating a collective will that eventually impact city government policy. We argue that these cases show the potential of ABIs to enhance government effectiveness, as the participatory process creates preferable so- lutions to those produced by city experts. We also argue that it is the narrow scope of the participation schemes, rather than the lack of power devolved to citizens, that limits the ABIs contribution to urban democracy. This hinders the ABI's ability to address social justice and puts the legitimacy of the participatory arrangements at risk. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hovik, Sissel
Legard, Sveinung
Bertelsen, Inger Miriam
spellingShingle Hovik, Sissel
Legard, Sveinung
Bertelsen, Inger Miriam
Area-based initiatives and urban democracy
author_facet Hovik, Sissel
Legard, Sveinung
Bertelsen, Inger Miriam
author_sort Hovik, Sissel
title Area-based initiatives and urban democracy
title_short Area-based initiatives and urban democracy
title_full Area-based initiatives and urban democracy
title_fullStr Area-based initiatives and urban democracy
title_full_unstemmed Area-based initiatives and urban democracy
title_sort area-based initiatives and urban democracy
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3109814
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104638
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Grønland
genre_facet Grønland
op_source Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning
144
Jan 2024
8
op_relation Norges forskningsråd: 281131.
Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning. 2023, 144 (Jan 2024), .
urn:issn:0264-2751
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3109814
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104638
cristin:2219691
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104638
container_title Cities
container_volume 144
container_start_page 104638
_version_ 1789966552956665856