Prediction of Stress Correction Factor for Welded Joints Using Response Surface Models

While performing fatigue reliability analysis of the butt-welded joints it is vital to estimate the Stress Concentration Factor at these joints. A common approach adopted by industry to estimate the SCF at weld toes is to perform Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of the welded joints for different pipe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Volume 3: Materials Technology
Main Authors: Keprate, Arvind, Donthi, Nikhil
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2988645
https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2021-62948
id fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:11250/2988645
record_format openpolar
spelling fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:11250/2988645 2023-06-11T04:07:25+02:00 Prediction of Stress Correction Factor for Welded Joints Using Response Surface Models Keprate, Arvind Donthi, Nikhil 2022-01-25T12:11:24Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2988645 https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2021-62948 eng eng American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME 2021 40th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Volume 2: Structures, Safety, and Reliability ASME 2021 40th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering;Volume 2: Structures, Safety, and Reliability urn:isbn:978-0-7918-8512-3 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2988645 https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2021-62948 cristin:1989393 © 2017 by ASME OMAE2021-62948 40 2 1-8 Response surface methodology Welded joints Finite element analyses Event history analyses Fittings Pipe sizes Conference object 2022 fthsosloakersoda https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2021-62948 2023-05-10T22:39:07Z While performing fatigue reliability analysis of the butt-welded joints it is vital to estimate the Stress Concentration Factor at these joints. A common approach adopted by industry to estimate the SCF at weld toes is to perform Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of the welded joints for different pipe sizes, flanges, valves etc. The SCF are calculated for each size by separately when required and are very time consuming. Although FEA is known for its accurate SCF calculation, but due to its high computational expense and time-consumption, SCF evaluation for different parameters makes the aforementioned method quite laborious. As an alternative response surface models (RSM) may be used for accurate estimation of SCF. The two basic steps in constructing a RSM are training and testing. The first corresponds to fitting a model to the intelligently chosen training points, while the second step involves comparing the predictions of the RSM to the actual response. This paper examines the applicability of 12 different RSMs for estimating SCF. The training and testing data is generated using FEA in ANSYS. In order to compare the accuracy of the RSMs, three metrics, namely, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Maximum Absolute Error (AAE), and Explained Variance Score (EVS) are used. A case study illustrating the applicability of the proposed approach is also presented. publishedVersion Conference Object Arctic OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive) Volume 3: Materials Technology
institution Open Polar
collection OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive)
op_collection_id fthsosloakersoda
language English
topic Response surface methodology
Welded joints
Finite element analyses
Event history analyses
Fittings
Pipe sizes
spellingShingle Response surface methodology
Welded joints
Finite element analyses
Event history analyses
Fittings
Pipe sizes
Keprate, Arvind
Donthi, Nikhil
Prediction of Stress Correction Factor for Welded Joints Using Response Surface Models
topic_facet Response surface methodology
Welded joints
Finite element analyses
Event history analyses
Fittings
Pipe sizes
description While performing fatigue reliability analysis of the butt-welded joints it is vital to estimate the Stress Concentration Factor at these joints. A common approach adopted by industry to estimate the SCF at weld toes is to perform Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of the welded joints for different pipe sizes, flanges, valves etc. The SCF are calculated for each size by separately when required and are very time consuming. Although FEA is known for its accurate SCF calculation, but due to its high computational expense and time-consumption, SCF evaluation for different parameters makes the aforementioned method quite laborious. As an alternative response surface models (RSM) may be used for accurate estimation of SCF. The two basic steps in constructing a RSM are training and testing. The first corresponds to fitting a model to the intelligently chosen training points, while the second step involves comparing the predictions of the RSM to the actual response. This paper examines the applicability of 12 different RSMs for estimating SCF. The training and testing data is generated using FEA in ANSYS. In order to compare the accuracy of the RSMs, three metrics, namely, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Maximum Absolute Error (AAE), and Explained Variance Score (EVS) are used. A case study illustrating the applicability of the proposed approach is also presented. publishedVersion
format Conference Object
author Keprate, Arvind
Donthi, Nikhil
author_facet Keprate, Arvind
Donthi, Nikhil
author_sort Keprate, Arvind
title Prediction of Stress Correction Factor for Welded Joints Using Response Surface Models
title_short Prediction of Stress Correction Factor for Welded Joints Using Response Surface Models
title_full Prediction of Stress Correction Factor for Welded Joints Using Response Surface Models
title_fullStr Prediction of Stress Correction Factor for Welded Joints Using Response Surface Models
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Stress Correction Factor for Welded Joints Using Response Surface Models
title_sort prediction of stress correction factor for welded joints using response surface models
publisher American Society of Mechanical Engineers
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2988645
https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2021-62948
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source OMAE2021-62948
40
2
1-8
op_relation ASME 2021 40th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Volume 2: Structures, Safety, and Reliability
ASME 2021 40th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering;Volume 2: Structures, Safety, and Reliability
urn:isbn:978-0-7918-8512-3
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2988645
https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2021-62948
cristin:1989393
op_rights © 2017 by ASME
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2021-62948
container_title Volume 3: Materials Technology
_version_ 1768380567609409536