A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
Objective: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni-...
Published in: | Acta Neurochirurgica |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2828843 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 |
id |
fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:11250/2828843 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:11250/2828843 2023-05-15T17:43:38+02:00 A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery Werner, David Andreas Thomas Grotle, Margreth Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova Gulati, Sasha Nygaard, Øystein Petter Salvesen, Øyvind Ingebrigtsen, Tor Solberg, Tore Norway 2021-08-06T14:45:40Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2828843 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 eng eng Springer Acta Neurochirurgica;163, pages (2021) Acta Neurochirurgica. 2021, . urn:issn:0001-6268 urn:issn:0942-0940 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2828843 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 cristin:1924427 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no © The Author(s) 2021 CC-BY 163 Acta Neurochirurgica 2567–2580 Microdiscectomy Outcomes Patient-reported outcome measures PROMs Qualities Oswestry Disability Index ODI Lumbar disc surgery Peer reviewed Journal article 2021 fthsosloakersoda https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 2021-11-17T23:33:13Z Objective: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess potential prognostic factors for previously defined cut-offs for failure and worsening on the Oswestry Disability Index scores 12 months after surgery. Since the cut-offs for failure and worsening are different for patients with low, moderate, and high baseline ODI scores, the multivariate analyses were run separately for these subgroups. Data were split into a training (70%) and a validation set (30%). The model was developed in the training set and tested in the validation set. A prediction (%) of an outcome was calculated for each patient in a risk matrix. Results: The prognostic model produced six risk matrices based on three baseline ODI ranges (low, medium, and high) and two outcomes (failure and worsening), each containing 7 to 11 prognostic factors. Model discrimination and calibration were acceptable. The estimated preoperative probabilities ranged from 3 to 94% for failure and from 1 to 72% for worsening in our validation cohort. Conclusion: We developed a prognostic model for failure and worsening 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The model showed acceptable calibration and discrimination, and could be useful in assisting physicians and patients in clinical decision-making process prior to surgery. The main author, David Werner, has received grants from the Regional Health Authority of Northern Norway, and the Norwegian Medical Association – Foundation for quality improvement and patient safety, for the purpose of this project. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive) Norway Acta Neurochirurgica 163 9 2567 2580 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive) |
op_collection_id |
fthsosloakersoda |
language |
English |
topic |
Microdiscectomy Outcomes Patient-reported outcome measures PROMs Qualities Oswestry Disability Index ODI Lumbar disc surgery |
spellingShingle |
Microdiscectomy Outcomes Patient-reported outcome measures PROMs Qualities Oswestry Disability Index ODI Lumbar disc surgery Werner, David Andreas Thomas Grotle, Margreth Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova Gulati, Sasha Nygaard, Øystein Petter Salvesen, Øyvind Ingebrigtsen, Tor Solberg, Tore A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
topic_facet |
Microdiscectomy Outcomes Patient-reported outcome measures PROMs Qualities Oswestry Disability Index ODI Lumbar disc surgery |
description |
Objective: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess potential prognostic factors for previously defined cut-offs for failure and worsening on the Oswestry Disability Index scores 12 months after surgery. Since the cut-offs for failure and worsening are different for patients with low, moderate, and high baseline ODI scores, the multivariate analyses were run separately for these subgroups. Data were split into a training (70%) and a validation set (30%). The model was developed in the training set and tested in the validation set. A prediction (%) of an outcome was calculated for each patient in a risk matrix. Results: The prognostic model produced six risk matrices based on three baseline ODI ranges (low, medium, and high) and two outcomes (failure and worsening), each containing 7 to 11 prognostic factors. Model discrimination and calibration were acceptable. The estimated preoperative probabilities ranged from 3 to 94% for failure and from 1 to 72% for worsening in our validation cohort. Conclusion: We developed a prognostic model for failure and worsening 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The model showed acceptable calibration and discrimination, and could be useful in assisting physicians and patients in clinical decision-making process prior to surgery. The main author, David Werner, has received grants from the Regional Health Authority of Northern Norway, and the Norwegian Medical Association – Foundation for quality improvement and patient safety, for the purpose of this project. publishedVersion |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Werner, David Andreas Thomas Grotle, Margreth Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova Gulati, Sasha Nygaard, Øystein Petter Salvesen, Øyvind Ingebrigtsen, Tor Solberg, Tore |
author_facet |
Werner, David Andreas Thomas Grotle, Margreth Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova Gulati, Sasha Nygaard, Øystein Petter Salvesen, Øyvind Ingebrigtsen, Tor Solberg, Tore |
author_sort |
Werner, David Andreas Thomas |
title |
A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_short |
A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_full |
A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_fullStr |
A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed |
A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery |
title_sort |
prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the norwegian registry for spine surgery |
publisher |
Springer |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2828843 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 |
op_coverage |
Norway |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Northern Norway |
genre_facet |
Northern Norway |
op_source |
163 Acta Neurochirurgica 2567–2580 |
op_relation |
Acta Neurochirurgica;163, pages (2021) Acta Neurochirurgica. 2021, . urn:issn:0001-6268 urn:issn:0942-0940 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2828843 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 cristin:1924427 |
op_rights |
Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no © The Author(s) 2021 |
op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04859-3 |
container_title |
Acta Neurochirurgica |
container_volume |
163 |
container_issue |
9 |
container_start_page |
2567 |
op_container_end_page |
2580 |
_version_ |
1766145761726169088 |