Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?

Study Design: Prospective multicenter cohort study. Objective: To investigate (1) the discriminative ability and cutoff estimates for success 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) raw score compared with a change and a percentage change score and (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global Spine Journal
Main Authors: Werner, David Andreas Thomas, Grotle, Margreth, Gulati, Sasha, Austevoll, Ivar Magne, Madsbu, Mattis Aleksander, Lønne, Greger, Solberg, Tore
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10642/8186
https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219851480
id fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:10642/8186
record_format openpolar
spelling fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:10642/8186 2023-05-15T17:43:38+02:00 Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score? Werner, David Andreas Thomas Grotle, Margreth Gulati, Sasha Austevoll, Ivar Magne Madsbu, Mattis Aleksander Lønne, Greger Solberg, Tore 2020-02-26T07:18:47Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10642/8186 https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219851480 en eng SAGE Publications Global Spine Journal;Volume 10, issue 1 Werner D, Grotle M, Gulati S, Austevoll IM, Madsbu MA, Lønne G, Solberg T. Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?. Global Spine Journal. 2019;10(1):47-54 urn:issn:2192-5682 urn:issn:2192-5690 https://hdl.handle.net/10642/8186 https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219851480 cristin:1797041 Creative Commons Non Commercial No Derivs CC BY-NC-ND: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ CC-BY-NC-ND Global Spine Journal Patient acceptable symptom states Oswestry disability indexes Success criterias Lumbar disc surgeries Patient reported outcome measures Lumbar disc herniations Journal article Peer reviewed 2020 fthsosloakersoda https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219851480 2021-10-11T16:53:20Z Study Design: Prospective multicenter cohort study. Objective: To investigate (1) the discriminative ability and cutoff estimates for success 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) raw score compared with a change and a percentage change score and (2) to what extent these clinical outcomes depend on the baseline disability. Methods: A total of 6840 patients operated for lumbar disc herniation from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) were included. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, a global perceived effect (GPE) scale (1-7) was used an external anchor. Success was defined as categories 1-2, “completely recovered” and “much better.” Cutoffs for success for subgroups with different preoperative disability were also estimated. Results: When defining success after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, 95% CI) for the ODI raw score (0.83, 0.87, 0.930, 0.924-0.937) was comparable to the ODI percentage change score (0.85, 0.85, 0.925, 0.918-0.931), and higher than the ODI change score (0.79, 0.73, 0.838, 0.830-0.852). The cutoff for success was highly dependent on the amount of baseline disability (low-high), with cutoffs ranging from 13 to 28 for the ODI raw score and 39% to 66% for ODI percentage change. The ODI change score (points) was not as accurate. Conclusion: The 12-month ODI raw score, like the ODI percentage change score, can define a successful outcome with excellent accuracy. Adjustment for the baseline ODI score should be performed when comparing outcomes across groups, and one should consider using cutoffs according to preoperative disability (low, medium, high ODI scores). This study was supported by The Norwegian Medical Association–Foundation for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, and The Regional Health Authority of Northern Norway. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive) Norway Global Spine Journal 10 1 47 54
institution Open Polar
collection OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive)
op_collection_id fthsosloakersoda
language English
topic Patient acceptable symptom states
Oswestry disability indexes
Success criterias
Lumbar disc surgeries
Patient reported outcome measures
Lumbar disc herniations
spellingShingle Patient acceptable symptom states
Oswestry disability indexes
Success criterias
Lumbar disc surgeries
Patient reported outcome measures
Lumbar disc herniations
Werner, David Andreas Thomas
Grotle, Margreth
Gulati, Sasha
Austevoll, Ivar Magne
Madsbu, Mattis Aleksander
Lønne, Greger
Solberg, Tore
Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?
topic_facet Patient acceptable symptom states
Oswestry disability indexes
Success criterias
Lumbar disc surgeries
Patient reported outcome measures
Lumbar disc herniations
description Study Design: Prospective multicenter cohort study. Objective: To investigate (1) the discriminative ability and cutoff estimates for success 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) raw score compared with a change and a percentage change score and (2) to what extent these clinical outcomes depend on the baseline disability. Methods: A total of 6840 patients operated for lumbar disc herniation from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) were included. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, a global perceived effect (GPE) scale (1-7) was used an external anchor. Success was defined as categories 1-2, “completely recovered” and “much better.” Cutoffs for success for subgroups with different preoperative disability were also estimated. Results: When defining success after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, 95% CI) for the ODI raw score (0.83, 0.87, 0.930, 0.924-0.937) was comparable to the ODI percentage change score (0.85, 0.85, 0.925, 0.918-0.931), and higher than the ODI change score (0.79, 0.73, 0.838, 0.830-0.852). The cutoff for success was highly dependent on the amount of baseline disability (low-high), with cutoffs ranging from 13 to 28 for the ODI raw score and 39% to 66% for ODI percentage change. The ODI change score (points) was not as accurate. Conclusion: The 12-month ODI raw score, like the ODI percentage change score, can define a successful outcome with excellent accuracy. Adjustment for the baseline ODI score should be performed when comparing outcomes across groups, and one should consider using cutoffs according to preoperative disability (low, medium, high ODI scores). This study was supported by The Norwegian Medical Association–Foundation for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, and The Regional Health Authority of Northern Norway. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Werner, David Andreas Thomas
Grotle, Margreth
Gulati, Sasha
Austevoll, Ivar Magne
Madsbu, Mattis Aleksander
Lønne, Greger
Solberg, Tore
author_facet Werner, David Andreas Thomas
Grotle, Margreth
Gulati, Sasha
Austevoll, Ivar Magne
Madsbu, Mattis Aleksander
Lønne, Greger
Solberg, Tore
author_sort Werner, David Andreas Thomas
title Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?
title_short Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?
title_full Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?
title_fullStr Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?
title_full_unstemmed Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?
title_sort can a successful outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation be defined by the oswestry disability index raw score?
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10642/8186
https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219851480
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Northern Norway
genre_facet Northern Norway
op_source Global Spine Journal
op_relation Global Spine Journal;Volume 10, issue 1
Werner D, Grotle M, Gulati S, Austevoll IM, Madsbu MA, Lønne G, Solberg T. Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?. Global Spine Journal. 2019;10(1):47-54
urn:issn:2192-5682
urn:issn:2192-5690
https://hdl.handle.net/10642/8186
https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219851480
cristin:1797041
op_rights Creative Commons Non Commercial No Derivs CC BY-NC-ND: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219851480
container_title Global Spine Journal
container_volume 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
op_container_end_page 54
_version_ 1766145761519599616