Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway

Objectives: The caesarean (CS) section rate varies among hospitals in Norway, and little is known about whether this is influenced by women’s preferences. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in women’s preferred mode of delivery during pregnancy between five hospitals in Norway,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Main Authors: Lindstad Løvåsmoen, Elin Marie, Bjørgo, Mari Nyland, Lukasse, Mirjam, Schei, Berit, Henriksen, Lena
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10642/7066
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.009
id fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:10642/7066
record_format openpolar
spelling fthsosloakersoda:oai:oda.oslomet.no:10642/7066 2023-05-15T18:34:31+02:00 Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway Lindstad Løvåsmoen, Elin Marie Bjørgo, Mari Nyland Lukasse, Mirjam Schei, Berit Henriksen, Lena 2019-05-03T11:40:12Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10642/7066 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.009 en eng Elsevier Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare;Volume 16, June 2018 Lindstad Løvåsmoen EM, Bjørgo MN, Lukasse M, Schei B, Henriksen L. Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway. Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare. 2018;16:206-212 urn:issn:1877-5756 urn:issn:1877-5764 https://hdl.handle.net/10642/7066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.009 cristin:1594191 © 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ CC-BY-NC-ND Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare Bidens studies Caesarean sections Preferences Maternal requests Delivery modes Journal article Peer reviewed 2019 fthsosloakersoda https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.009 2021-10-11T16:53:21Z Objectives: The caesarean (CS) section rate varies among hospitals in Norway, and little is known about whether this is influenced by women’s preferences. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in women’s preferred mode of delivery during pregnancy between five hospitals in Norway, and to relate this to the actual mode of delivery. Study design: A prospective cohort study of 2,177 unselected pregnant women in five hospitals in Norway. Women were recruited at their standard ultrasound examinations, and data was collected through questionnaires and electronic patient charts. The exposure was a CS preference and the main outcome measure was the actual mode of delivery. Results: In total, 3.5% of the primiparous women and 9.6% of the multiparous women reported a preference for CS. This was associated with fear of childbirth and education between 10 and 13 years in both groups, symptoms of depression and an age over 35 years old among the primiparous women, and a previous CS and/or negative birth experience among the multiparous. The multiparous women in Drammen and Tromsø were less likely to prefer a CS, and none of the primiparous women in Tromsø preferred a CS. A total of 67.8% of those who preferred a CS gave birth with this mode of delivery. Conclusion: There were significant differences between the hospitals according to the CS preference. This preference was associated with the previous obstetric history and psychological factors. Therefore, creating good birth experiences and offering women counselling may reduce the CS preference rate. The Bidens study was supported by the Daphne II Program, European Commission for Freedom, Security and Justice, Brussels, Belgium (Grant no. JLS/2006/DAP-1/242/W30-CE-0120887/00-87) and by the Norwegian Research Council (Grant no. 204292). acceptedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Tromsø OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive) Norway Tromsø Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 16 206 212
institution Open Polar
collection OsloMet (Oslo Metropolitan University): ODA (Open Digital Archive)
op_collection_id fthsosloakersoda
language English
topic Bidens studies
Caesarean sections
Preferences
Maternal requests
Delivery modes
spellingShingle Bidens studies
Caesarean sections
Preferences
Maternal requests
Delivery modes
Lindstad Løvåsmoen, Elin Marie
Bjørgo, Mari Nyland
Lukasse, Mirjam
Schei, Berit
Henriksen, Lena
Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway
topic_facet Bidens studies
Caesarean sections
Preferences
Maternal requests
Delivery modes
description Objectives: The caesarean (CS) section rate varies among hospitals in Norway, and little is known about whether this is influenced by women’s preferences. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in women’s preferred mode of delivery during pregnancy between five hospitals in Norway, and to relate this to the actual mode of delivery. Study design: A prospective cohort study of 2,177 unselected pregnant women in five hospitals in Norway. Women were recruited at their standard ultrasound examinations, and data was collected through questionnaires and electronic patient charts. The exposure was a CS preference and the main outcome measure was the actual mode of delivery. Results: In total, 3.5% of the primiparous women and 9.6% of the multiparous women reported a preference for CS. This was associated with fear of childbirth and education between 10 and 13 years in both groups, symptoms of depression and an age over 35 years old among the primiparous women, and a previous CS and/or negative birth experience among the multiparous. The multiparous women in Drammen and Tromsø were less likely to prefer a CS, and none of the primiparous women in Tromsø preferred a CS. A total of 67.8% of those who preferred a CS gave birth with this mode of delivery. Conclusion: There were significant differences between the hospitals according to the CS preference. This preference was associated with the previous obstetric history and psychological factors. Therefore, creating good birth experiences and offering women counselling may reduce the CS preference rate. The Bidens study was supported by the Daphne II Program, European Commission for Freedom, Security and Justice, Brussels, Belgium (Grant no. JLS/2006/DAP-1/242/W30-CE-0120887/00-87) and by the Norwegian Research Council (Grant no. 204292). acceptedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lindstad Løvåsmoen, Elin Marie
Bjørgo, Mari Nyland
Lukasse, Mirjam
Schei, Berit
Henriksen, Lena
author_facet Lindstad Løvåsmoen, Elin Marie
Bjørgo, Mari Nyland
Lukasse, Mirjam
Schei, Berit
Henriksen, Lena
author_sort Lindstad Løvåsmoen, Elin Marie
title Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway
title_short Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway
title_full Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway
title_fullStr Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway
title_sort women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - comparing five sites in norway
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10642/7066
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.009
geographic Norway
Tromsø
geographic_facet Norway
Tromsø
genre Tromsø
genre_facet Tromsø
op_source Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare
op_relation Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare;Volume 16, June 2018
Lindstad Løvåsmoen EM, Bjørgo MN, Lukasse M, Schei B, Henriksen L. Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway. Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare. 2018;16:206-212
urn:issn:1877-5756
urn:issn:1877-5764
https://hdl.handle.net/10642/7066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.009
cristin:1594191
op_rights © 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.009
container_title Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
container_volume 16
container_start_page 206
op_container_end_page 212
_version_ 1766219299803889664