Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard.

Natural regeneration after anthropogenic disturbance is slow in the tundra biome, but assisted regeneration can help speed up the process. A tracked off-road vehicle damaged a High Arctic dwarf shrub heath in Svalbard in May 2009, drastically reducing vegetation cover, soil seed bank and incoming se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Science
Main Authors: Neby, Magne, Semenchuk, Philipp, Neby, Erica, Cooper, Elisabeth
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3000178
https://doi.org/10.1139/AS-2021-0016
id fthsinnlandet:oai:brage.inn.no:11250/3000178
record_format openpolar
spelling fthsinnlandet:oai:brage.inn.no:11250/3000178 2024-03-03T08:39:35+00:00 Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard. Neby, Magne Semenchuk, Philipp Neby, Erica Cooper, Elisabeth 2021 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3000178 https://doi.org/10.1139/AS-2021-0016 eng eng Arctic Science. 2021 urn:issn:2368-7460 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3000178 https://doi.org/10.1139/AS-2021-0016 cristin:1981594 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no 38 Arctic Science Arctic revegetation Svalbard plant community restoration VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400 Peer reviewed Journal article 2021 fthsinnlandet https://doi.org/10.1139/AS-2021-0016 2024-02-02T12:42:13Z Natural regeneration after anthropogenic disturbance is slow in the tundra biome, but assisted regeneration can help speed up the process. A tracked off-road vehicle damaged a High Arctic dwarf shrub heath in Svalbard in May 2009, drastically reducing vegetation cover, soil seed bank and incoming seed rain. We assisted regeneration the following year using six different revegetation treatments, and monitored their effects one month-, and one- and eight years after their application. By 2018, all treatments still had a lower vegetation cover and limited species composition than the undamaged reference vegetation. The fertiliser treatment was the most effective in restoring vegetation cover (71 % vegetation cover, of which 62 % were bryophytes and 38 % vascular plant species). Compared to the reference plots (98 % vegetation cover, of which 32 % were bryophytes and 66 % were vascular plant species), the composition of the disturbed vegetation was still far from regenerated to its original state nine years after the tracks were made. The slow regrowth demonstrated in this study underlines the importance of avoiding disturbance of fragile tundra, and of implementing and upholding regulations restricting or banning such disturbance. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Svalbard Tundra Høgskolen i Innlandet: Brage INN Arctic Svalbard Arctic Science 8 3 1006 1025
institution Open Polar
collection Høgskolen i Innlandet: Brage INN
op_collection_id fthsinnlandet
language English
topic Arctic
revegetation
Svalbard
plant community
restoration
VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400
spellingShingle Arctic
revegetation
Svalbard
plant community
restoration
VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400
Neby, Magne
Semenchuk, Philipp
Neby, Erica
Cooper, Elisabeth
Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard.
topic_facet Arctic
revegetation
Svalbard
plant community
restoration
VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400
description Natural regeneration after anthropogenic disturbance is slow in the tundra biome, but assisted regeneration can help speed up the process. A tracked off-road vehicle damaged a High Arctic dwarf shrub heath in Svalbard in May 2009, drastically reducing vegetation cover, soil seed bank and incoming seed rain. We assisted regeneration the following year using six different revegetation treatments, and monitored their effects one month-, and one- and eight years after their application. By 2018, all treatments still had a lower vegetation cover and limited species composition than the undamaged reference vegetation. The fertiliser treatment was the most effective in restoring vegetation cover (71 % vegetation cover, of which 62 % were bryophytes and 38 % vascular plant species). Compared to the reference plots (98 % vegetation cover, of which 32 % were bryophytes and 66 % were vascular plant species), the composition of the disturbed vegetation was still far from regenerated to its original state nine years after the tracks were made. The slow regrowth demonstrated in this study underlines the importance of avoiding disturbance of fragile tundra, and of implementing and upholding regulations restricting or banning such disturbance. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Neby, Magne
Semenchuk, Philipp
Neby, Erica
Cooper, Elisabeth
author_facet Neby, Magne
Semenchuk, Philipp
Neby, Erica
Cooper, Elisabeth
author_sort Neby, Magne
title Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard.
title_short Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard.
title_full Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard.
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard.
title_sort comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in high arctic tundra on svalbard.
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3000178
https://doi.org/10.1139/AS-2021-0016
geographic Arctic
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Svalbard
genre Arctic
Arctic
Svalbard
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Svalbard
Tundra
op_source 38
Arctic Science
op_relation Arctic Science. 2021
urn:issn:2368-7460
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3000178
https://doi.org/10.1139/AS-2021-0016
cristin:1981594
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/AS-2021-0016
container_title Arctic Science
container_volume 8
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1006
op_container_end_page 1025
_version_ 1792495184553967616